You might want to work on that whole "countering different opinions" thing yourself before getting snarky. The entire point of my comment was that you were being dismissive and myopic with your "Well, they didn't matter much to me, so why should you care about them" attitude.Karathos said:. I was stating my opinion - there's no need to be petty when responding to it. Or maybe there is, since it's the only way alot of people seem to be able to counter differing opinions these days.
Well, if you think Dragon Age was crap, then that just might explain why people who loved the game think differently than you do.IAmTheVoid said:I don't see it as 'dumbing down', but more 'cutting the crap'. Origins were an interesting experiment, introduced you to the world in an interesting way and making what was essentially a tutorial bearable. What, exactly, could they do again?
First off, it's not much of an assumption. The have stated that the game is being designed around third person perspective. That isn't conducive to tactical combat. Unless they're designing two completely different combat systems from the ground up- which would be a much wilder assumption- then the PC version will be much like the console one.IAmTheVoid said:As for mod tools: http://www.actiontrip.com/rei/comments_news.phtml?id=080910_5
Tactical combat is out? Well, that's an assumption to rival assumptions.
Look, I can see why fans will be afraid of the changes being made, it's the same with any new development in any media. I hate to put all my eggs in one basket, but this is BioWare. They know the value of their IP's, their worlds, and their storytelling. Origins wasn't about the combat, or the Origins (despite the name, funnily enough!). It was about the world, your companions and their story. The choices you made in DA1 will carry over into 2, there will definitely be cameos (to placate all the Alistair fangirls no doubt) and we're going to see more of the world. Just give the people who made the game you love the benefit of the doubt.
And while I'm at it, recall that the marketing for DA1 made it seem like a dumbed down action game. If you're feeling the same worries you were about DA2 when you watched all of that stuff for DA1, well... you're going through the same phase again.
Doom-Sayer! Ill not have you sully the good name of Bioware! Defend thy honor!Anti Nudist Cupcake said:And so it has begun as I had predicted.
The fanboys have started to open their eyes. They are only beginning to question bioware, but soon it will go out of control and bioware will no longer be god of rpgs. Even a fanboy can only remain blindly obedient and pretend to enjoy games for so long...
The end is near.
Don't really care about what you were arguing about, but your unrivaled ability to put words in people mouths is pissing me off.BloodSquirrel said:You might want to work on that whole "countering different opinions" thing yourself before getting snarky. The entire point of my comment was that you were being dismissive and myopic with your "Well, they didn't matter much to me, so why should you care about them" attitude.Karathos said:. I was stating my opinion - there's no need to be petty when responding to it. Or maybe there is, since it's the only way alot of people seem to be able to counter differing opinions these days.
Well, if you think Dragon Age was crap, then that just might explain why people who loved the game think differently than you do.IAmTheVoid said:I don't see it as 'dumbing down', but more 'cutting the crap'. Origins were an interesting experiment, introduced you to the world in an interesting way and making what was essentially a tutorial bearable. What, exactly, could they do again?
Actually, I think I'll like it more. You see My little brother was anxious as hell to get the game after the Sacred Ashes trailer, when we finally got it and he saw it his interest dropped rapidly. I think that if the second game gives us console users a better combat system (or at least a more engaging one) than the original he would actually try it. That'd make my day since he and I don't really get along that well (as you'd expect from brothers 5 years apart in age sharing a room) and if I can actually get him to try something new, something I absolutely love, I'd say that's worth $60, wouldn't you? If anything else, at least he and I'll have another game to share and who knows, he could *gasp of all gasps!* admit that his older brother actually knows something?!? (Seriously, I don't remember being this stubborn when I was 15)gof22 said:I will admit I was a bit sad that there were not as many RPG elements in Mass Effect 2 as there was in Mass Effect 1. I suppose I can see why they are making their games easier too. I think they are trying to draw bigger audiences towards their games but at the same time keep the RPG elements that fans of their older games love. That is just my guess though.Talvrae said:Probably yes... But i have the feeling that it will suffer of a new trend in Bioware... dumping down theyr game to more casual market... They did it with Mass Effect 2 too. Yes Mass Effect 2 is a great game... but the RPG element in it have been greatelly reduced, the character progression have been heavilly simplified... i fear they are doing the same to Dragon Agegof22 said:The trailer was pretty nice. I will most likely get Dragon Age 2 and I probably will enjoy it. In my opinion Bioware has always made really good games and I am sure this one will be good as well.
But the entire premise of DA2 is that you start off as Hawke when he's just a refugee. Then throughout the game he becomes The Champion of Kirkwall. He's won't be considered special at all in the beginning. He has to earn his legendary status.Patrick_and_the_ricks said:Same, I like the Bethesda model, were you can become a great hero or villan, but you don't start off well known or "special". If you want to be a legend you have to earn it. That makes it feel so much more rewarding when you reach the top, because you feel like you started from nothing. Like in Origins were you may be a noble or civilian or whatever but your not a "chosen one". You were just at the right place at the right time. Hopefully they don't play up the whole chosen one to much... (This looks a little to much like Mass Effect, might as well call him Commander Hawke XD)Irridium said:Either way, not too thrilled about being "the chosen one" or whatever it is.
um, sorry, i just am not into dragon age so much (although i might start with DA2) also, i don't remember saying only that he is a decentant of Morrigan's, i said Maybe, i didn't know, hell, i didn't even remember due to lack of rememberance.Dr. wonderful said:Doing the trailer over?ciortas1 said:Even if it's the same thing, surely you would frown upon them basically doing it all over again?
Nah, they changed enough to make it fresh, even showed flashbacks to Hawk village destruction.
Oh for the love-Jsay18 said:i think i read in game informer that either (due to lack of rememberance)
you are Morrigan's decendant, (i.e: grandson i think)
or that you are not, and they are both fighting differnt battle in the same period of time. (no 200 year differece, like fable series.) after the arch dude got owned.
It take place over a ten year period starting at the END of DA:O. Hawke is a grown man already.
I'm sorry, it just that...Do you have any idea how many people said the exact same thing?Jsay18 said:Snip
then a glaive?TheDrunkNinja said:Naginata is more of a slashing/sweeping weapon. This seems to have both stabbing and slashing capabilities. Also, this has a shorter handle to it, probably for better control in a close-combat. I'm not trying to argue or anything; I just think this new weapon Hawke wields is kind of in a class of its own.Zeithri said:Naginata then.cainx10a said:It doesn't exactly look like a polearm, the blade is too long, long enough to be that of a long sword. Not that I am a sword/staff expert or anything, but that's just my observation.
![]()
Only a more stylished look.