Trailers: Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 - Spec Ops Survival Trailer

[Gazisultima]

I'm sorry, but it looks identical to MW2. Literally nothing's changed with 2 year's development. It's disgraceful.

 

[Venereus]

Freaking attack dogs with bombs? Seriously?

 

[Siberian Relic]

PS: this COD is most deserving of the title "Full price expansion pack"

You played it yet? Didn't think so. Keep your mouth shut.

 

[Treblaine]

PS: this COD is most deserving of the title "Full price expansion pack"

You played it yet? Didn't think so. Keep your mouth shut.

Have you?

Ditto

 

[Siberian Relic]

PS: this COD is most deserving of the title "Full price expansion pack"

You played it yet? Didn't think so. Keep your mouth shut.

Have you?

Ditto

I'm not passing premature judgment. Now sit down.

 

[Treblaine]

PS: this COD is most deserving of the title "Full price expansion pack"

You played it yet? Didn't think so. Keep your mouth shut.

Have you?

Ditto

I'm not passing premature judgment. Now sit down.

Fanboys have been riding this fallacy for the past 4 years: "oh you can't know till you pay the $60 and play through all the game yourself"

Well it's too late then. They've got your money!

It's obvious from all we have seen already, this isn't showing anything that would couldn't easily get with new MW2 map packs and some simple modding.

 

[Siberian Relic]

Fanboys have been riding this fallacy for the past 4 years: "oh you can't know till you pay the $60 and play through all the game yourself"

Well it's too late then. They've got your money!

It's obvious from all we have seen already, this isn't showing anything that would couldn't easily get with new MW2 map packs and some simple modding.

You can keep this dialogue going as long as you want, but here's the deal: the game is neither released nor finished, so unless you have access to both the current build of the game and Infinity Ward's production offices, you haven't a leg to stand on. I can do more than tolerate critical speculation for something pending its release and negative criticism following its release. Anything beyond that is just embarrassing ego-pumping, preparations for shouting: "Told ya so!" a few months down the line.

Proper critical perspectives can't be asserted through second-guessing, no matter the prior experiences. Buy, rent, or borrow, you're going to have to put something down and play the game before your opinion is going to carry any sort of legitimate weight. Period.

 

[Treblaine]

Fanboys have been riding this fallacy for the past 4 years: "oh you can't know till you pay the $60 and play through all the game yourself"

Well it's too late then. They've got your money!

It's obvious from all we have seen already, this isn't showing anything that would couldn't easily get with new MW2 map packs and some simple modding.

You can keep this dialogue going as long as you want, but here's the deal: the game is neither released nor finished, so unless you have access to both the current build of the game and Infinity Ward's production offices, you haven't a leg to stand on. I can do more than tolerate critical speculation for something pending its release and negative criticism following its release. Anything beyond that is just embarrassing ego-pumping, preparations for shouting: "Told ya so!" a few months down the line.

Proper critical perspectives can't be asserted through second-guessing, no matter the prior experiences. Buy, rent, or borrow, you're going to have to put something down and play the game before your opinion is going to carry any sort of legitimate weight. Period.

Not even to doubt them?

We should just let the Call of Duty hype machine with it's multi million dollar budget, millions of fans and a whole god damn XP roll ahead and let THEM say that it's the best fucking game ever...

... But I CAN'T say anything to counter that until I've actually played it?


You know full well millions of people are going to get hyped up about this game with pre-orders with something like 20% of its sales in the first DAY!

The sceptics can be expected to keep their opinions to themselves till then and point out the bullshit once so many have already bought the game!

I'm no chump, I can tell I'm being sold snake oil before I have to actually hand over my cash and realise it's not worth it.

This game really is 90% remixed assets of Modern Warfare 2!

If we were allowed to mod MW2 then MW3 would probably have been de-facto made by now from all the mods assembled together.

 

[Javarino]

Basically I'm worried this game will just be MW2.5 rather than a true Modern Warfare 3.

you're hung up on graphics too, much, it might only be slightly improved but it's a sequel in the same generation from a standard already pushing the envelope on consoles so, it'll do.

Hey, YOU said it was the best looking console game! You started this!

My point about the importance of graphics is not pushing the technical envelope but the artistic potential. MW3 does not have the inspired art design that is expected. MW2 is not that amazing in terms of appearance to get away with some slight barely noticeable improvements.

While I doubt its the BEST looking game, I still can appreciate the artstyle for MW2. Compared to Black Ops, MW2 is just so much brighter and cleaner/crisper. Couple that with fast and smooth gunplay and sheer variety (if all you use are sniper rifles and grenade launchers I swear you are missing out, I am to this day constantly trying my hand with different weapons) and you have yourself a pretty good-looking game.

I for one believe MW3 is definitely worth a purchase. Revamped multiplayer with new equipment, rebalanced gameplay, and interesting locations? Spec-Ops missions for me and a friend to compete in, and attempt to beat the records of? Brand new survival mode with intense firefights against infinite waves? Plus a brand new campaign about the events of a possible World War 3 situation? Sign me up.

I understand what COD is going for sacrificing a fair amount of detail (and resolution) to get it playing at a steady 60 fps. Though that's important on console, pretty much all PC games aim for 60fps capability without resolution sacrifices. Actually, even considering the limitations, the developers of MW3 could be doing more to give MW3 a distinct look. I'm not talking crispness, I'm talking about making the guns, weapons and items distinct from shit we have already played and paid for.

Riot Shield and juggernaut, we already seen that. Exploding dogs seem to be just like normal dogs but with "martydom" dropping a grenade after they die you have AMPLE time to escape. They also look identical, nothing cool like a unique dog model strapped with fires and explosives and a big beeping timer. I was thinking of something like Black Ops's explosive RC car but on legs and leaping!

Survival mode may soak up a lot of time but there isn't as much to is as new only not it is not part of a mission.

Yes, the objective based missions of MW2's spec ops are gone, this new mode is just in the same maps used for multiplayer absorbing wave after wave of enemies, it is a lot more like an enhanced Black Ops Combat Training.

http://www.oxm.co.uk/28994/news/mw3-spec-ops-will-help-you-avoid-swearing-8-year-olds/

No more stealth or Room-clearing or other of those unique modes, just Hoard Mode but with COD.

Revamping a lot of stuff cannot be worth $60 plus another $30-$60 for all the map packs to get the entire experience and be 100% up to speed with the rest of the community.

I HATE the multiple map packs, it divides the community. Have one BIG map pack, not many small ones. Even if they aren't all ready, buy one map-pack for $20 and updates add new packs as they are finalised. Ideally, release new maps FOR FREE, like every other serious multilayer game does. If you want to monetise, monetise things like accelerated levelling-up or "rent" weapons that are above your rank.

Dividing a community is bad, especially with COD's matchmaking system you can either be denied connecting to hosts who cycle through new maps, or you get kicked when the base moves to a non-stock map.

Three things: There ARE going to be spec-ops missions similar to MW2's, this is just extra.(not sure where you got the impression there wasn't going to be those, Infinity Ward confirmed there was.) And I remember BO's combat training being plagued impossible AI and being a dumbed down MP experience, this is a whole new mode where you fight off waves of increasingly difficult and varying enemies buying and enhancing equipment to let you survive another round. I love these modes, no matter what game they're in.

Last thing is that I agree with, 15$ is way too expensive for a map-pack that will divide the community between those with, and those without, dlc. I for one find I can enjoy a Call of Duty game without map-packs, especially Modern Warfare games that don't "require" you to have the dlc for many lobbies.

PS. I blame Activision.

 

[Treblaine]

Basically I'm worried this game will just be MW2.5 rather than a true Modern Warfare 3.

you're hung up on graphics too, much, it might only be slightly improved but it's a sequel in the same generation from a standard already pushing the envelope on consoles so, it'll do.

Hey, YOU said it was the best looking console game! You started this!

My point about the importance of graphics is not pushing the technical envelope but the artistic potential. MW3 does not have the inspired art design that is expected. MW2 is not that amazing in terms of appearance to get away with some slight barely noticeable improvements.

While I doubt its the BEST looking game, I still can appreciate the artstyle for MW2. Compared to Black Ops, MW2 is just so much brighter and cleaner/crisper. Couple that with fast and smooth gunplay and sheer variety (if all you use are sniper rifles and grenade launchers I swear you are missing out, I am to this day constantly trying my hand with different weapons) and you have yourself a pretty good-looking game.

I for one believe MW3 is definitely worth a purchase. Revamped multiplayer with new equipment, rebalanced gameplay, and interesting locations? Spec-Ops missions for me and a friend to compete in, and attempt to beat the records of? Brand new survival mode with intense firefights against infinite waves? Plus a brand new campaign about the events of a possible World War 3 situation? Sign me up.

I understand what COD is going for sacrificing a fair amount of detail (and resolution) to get it playing at a steady 60 fps. Though that's important on console, pretty much all PC games aim for 60fps capability without resolution sacrifices. Actually, even considering the limitations, the developers of MW3 could be doing more to give MW3 a distinct look. I'm not talking crispness, I'm talking about making the guns, weapons and items distinct from shit we have already played and paid for.

Riot Shield and juggernaut, we already seen that. Exploding dogs seem to be just like normal dogs but with "martydom" dropping a grenade after they die you have AMPLE time to escape. They also look identical, nothing cool like a unique dog model strapped with fires and explosives and a big beeping timer. I was thinking of something like Black Ops's explosive RC car but on legs and leaping!

Survival mode may soak up a lot of time but there isn't as much to is as new only not it is not part of a mission.

Yes, the objective based missions of MW2's spec ops are gone, this new mode is just in the same maps used for multiplayer absorbing wave after wave of enemies, it is a lot more like an enhanced Black Ops Combat Training.

http://www.oxm.co.uk/28994/news/mw3-spec-ops-will-help-you-avoid-swearing-8-year-olds/

No more stealth or Room-clearing or other of those unique modes, just Hoard Mode but with COD.

Revamping a lot of stuff cannot be worth $60 plus another $30-$60 for all the map packs to get the entire experience and be 100% up to speed with the rest of the community.

I HATE the multiple map packs, it divides the community. Have one BIG map pack, not many small ones. Even if they aren't all ready, buy one map-pack for $20 and updates add new packs as they are finalised. Ideally, release new maps FOR FREE, like every other serious multilayer game does. If you want to monetise, monetise things like accelerated levelling-up or "rent" weapons that are above your rank.

Dividing a community is bad, especially with COD's matchmaking system you can either be denied connecting to hosts who cycle through new maps, or you get kicked when the base moves to a non-stock map.

Three things: There ARE going to be spec-ops missions similar to MW2's, this is just extra.(not sure where you got the impression there wasn't going to be those, Infinity Ward confirmed there was.) And I remember BO's combat training being plagued impossible AI and being a dumbed down MP experience, this is a whole new mode where you fight off waves of increasingly difficult and varying enemies buying and enhancing equipment to let you survive another round. I love these modes, no matter what game they're in.

Last thing is that I agree with, 15$ is way too expensive for a map-pack that will divide the community between those with, and those without, dlc. I for one find I can enjoy a Call of Duty game without map-packs, especially Modern Warfare games that don't "require" you to have the dlc for many lobbies.

PS. I blame Activision.

My source contradicts your claim.

Do you have a source?

 

[Laser Priest]

The armory system may be interesting.

Still, I doubt this will be enough on top of Call of Duty's gameplay to warrant a purchase from me.

 

[Sephren468]

Looks like DLC for MW2. This looks horrible I will not spend money on this when there are so many other good looking games coming out this season. It most likely will be just as broken as MW2. But it will sell millions because sheep love the yearly expansions....

 

[JoesshittyOs]

Oh, It looks like Modern Warfare 2?

So fucking what? The game still plays better than any console FPS out on the market. The fans of the game know what they want.

Black Ops balanced the game, MW3 will most likely get the hit detection and lag on check. That's pretty much all it needs to do. People seem to forget that these games are actually pretty good

Looks like DLC for MW2. This looks horrible I will not spend money on this when there are so many other good looking games coming out this season. It most likely will be just as broken as MW2. But it will sell millions because sheep love the yearly expansions....

So I'm a sheep because I like Call of Duty games? How about you're a sheep because you have already given your opinion of the game without seeing more than a minute of consecutive gameplay footage.

It's an FPS for christs sakes, what the hell do you expect?

Seriously, Call of Duty haters are the most annoying excuses for life I have ever seen.

 

[Aiedail256]

If you can get air support, why can't you get air evac? Just sayin'

 

[Treblaine]

Oh, It looks like Modern Warfare 2?

So fucking what? The game still plays better than any console FPS out on the market. The fans of the game know what they want.

Black Ops balanced the game, MW3 will most likely get the hit detection and lag on check. That's pretty much all it needs to do. People seem to forget that these games are actually pretty good

Looks like DLC for MW2. This looks horrible I will not spend money on this when there are so many other good looking games coming out this season. It most likely will be just as broken as MW2. But it will sell millions because sheep love the yearly expansions....

So I'm a sheep because I like Call of Duty games? How about you're a sheep because you have already given your opinion of the game without seeing more than a minute of consecutive gameplay footage.

It's an FPS for christs sakes, what the hell do you expect?

Seriously, Call of Duty haters are the most annoying excuses for life I have ever seen.

So... so much. Where to start.

The fans of the series are being ripped off. This may be good, but it is so freaking similar to MW2 this should be $15 DLC, NOT a whole new $60 game!

Yes, these are quite good games, but if you paid $60 for MW2 you are being ripped off to pay another $60 for this game.

I don't think you understand the term "sheep". To be a sheep is just do what millions of other people do without individual critical thought. Sephren here is being an individual not swayed by the crowd and thinking critically about this product on their own.

"It's an FPS for christs sakes, what the hell do you expect?"

Better than this! FPS games are not so creatively bankrupt that it can coast on just this.

I've played over 100 hours of Black Ops though I didn't buy it till it was at quite a low price and the thing about MW3 is this looks like a DOWNGRADE going back from Black Ops' standard to MW2.

I follow COD and wouldn't call myself a fanboy but not a hater either. I'm just annoyed the games are so rushed and don't seem to be trying any more. I like the franchise enough to expect a high standard, I don't love it so unconditionally that I will tolerate any amount of backsliding.

 

[Javarino]

Basically I'm worried this game will just be MW2.5 rather than a true Modern Warfare 3.

you're hung up on graphics too, much, it might only be slightly improved but it's a sequel in the same generation from a standard already pushing the envelope on consoles so, it'll do.

Hey, YOU said it was the best looking console game! You started this!

My point about the importance of graphics is not pushing the technical envelope but the artistic potential. MW3 does not have the inspired art design that is expected. MW2 is not that amazing in terms of appearance to get away with some slight barely noticeable improvements.

While I doubt its the BEST looking game, I still can appreciate the artstyle for MW2. Compared to Black Ops, MW2 is just so much brighter and cleaner/crisper. Couple that with fast and smooth gunplay and sheer variety (if all you use are sniper rifles and grenade launchers I swear you are missing out, I am to this day constantly trying my hand with different weapons) and you have yourself a pretty good-looking game.

I for one believe MW3 is definitely worth a purchase. Revamped multiplayer with new equipment, rebalanced gameplay, and interesting locations? Spec-Ops missions for me and a friend to compete in, and attempt to beat the records of? Brand new survival mode with intense firefights against infinite waves? Plus a brand new campaign about the events of a possible World War 3 situation? Sign me up.

I understand what COD is going for sacrificing a fair amount of detail (and resolution) to get it playing at a steady 60 fps. Though that's important on console, pretty much all PC games aim for 60fps capability without resolution sacrifices. Actually, even considering the limitations, the developers of MW3 could be doing more to give MW3 a distinct look. I'm not talking crispness, I'm talking about making the guns, weapons and items distinct from shit we have already played and paid for.

Riot Shield and juggernaut, we already seen that. Exploding dogs seem to be just like normal dogs but with "martydom" dropping a grenade after they die you have AMPLE time to escape. They also look identical, nothing cool like a unique dog model strapped with fires and explosives and a big beeping timer. I was thinking of something like Black Ops's explosive RC car but on legs and leaping!

Survival mode may soak up a lot of time but there isn't as much to is as new only not it is not part of a mission.

Yes, the objective based missions of MW2's spec ops are gone, this new mode is just in the same maps used for multiplayer absorbing wave after wave of enemies, it is a lot more like an enhanced Black Ops Combat Training.

http://www.oxm.co.uk/28994/news/mw3-spec-ops-will-help-you-avoid-swearing-8-year-olds/

No more stealth or Room-clearing or other of those unique modes, just Hoard Mode but with COD.

Revamping a lot of stuff cannot be worth $60 plus another $30-$60 for all the map packs to get the entire experience and be 100% up to speed with the rest of the community.

I HATE the multiple map packs, it divides the community. Have one BIG map pack, not many small ones. Even if they aren't all ready, buy one map-pack for $20 and updates add new packs as they are finalised. Ideally, release new maps FOR FREE, like every other serious multilayer game does. If you want to monetise, monetise things like accelerated levelling-up or "rent" weapons that are above your rank.

Dividing a community is bad, especially with COD's matchmaking system you can either be denied connecting to hosts who cycle through new maps, or you get kicked when the base moves to a non-stock map.

Three things: There ARE going to be spec-ops missions similar to MW2's, this is just extra.(not sure where you got the impression there wasn't going to be those, Infinity Ward confirmed there was.) And I remember BO's combat training being plagued impossible AI and being a dumbed down MP experience, this is a whole new mode where you fight off waves of increasingly difficult and varying enemies buying and enhancing equipment to let you survive another round. I love these modes, no matter what game they're in.

Last thing is that I agree with, 15$ is way too expensive for a map-pack that will divide the community between those with, and those without, dlc. I for one find I can enjoy a Call of Duty game without map-packs, especially Modern Warfare games that don't "require" you to have the dlc for many lobbies.

PS. I blame Activision.

My source contradicts your claim.

Do you have a source?

@fourzerotwo
Robert Bowling
@SICK_OFSLUTS Spec Ops Missions are scenarios with win / lose, but Spec Ops Survival is infinite, never ending until you die

That is Infinity Ward creative director Robert Bowling's twitter feed. I remember reading other sources that also confirmed it, but I don't have the time to hunt them down. (I am beginning to doubt myself on this point, but I honestly can forgive them because they said survival on EVERY MP map. Enough variation for me.)

 

[Treblaine]

Basically I'm worried this game will just be MW2.5 rather than a true Modern Warfare 3.

you're hung up on graphics too, much, it might only be slightly improved but it's a sequel in the same generation from a standard already pushing the envelope on consoles so, it'll do.

Hey, YOU said it was the best looking console game! You started this!

My point about the importance of graphics is not pushing the technical envelope but the artistic potential. MW3 does not have the inspired art design that is expected. MW2 is not that amazing in terms of appearance to get away with some slight barely noticeable improvements.

While I doubt its the BEST looking game, I still can appreciate the artstyle for MW2. Compared to Black Ops, MW2 is just so much brighter and cleaner/crisper. Couple that with fast and smooth gunplay and sheer variety (if all you use are sniper rifles and grenade launchers I swear you are missing out, I am to this day constantly trying my hand with different weapons) and you have yourself a pretty good-looking game.

I for one believe MW3 is definitely worth a purchase. Revamped multiplayer with new equipment, rebalanced gameplay, and interesting locations? Spec-Ops missions for me and a friend to compete in, and attempt to beat the records of? Brand new survival mode with intense firefights against infinite waves? Plus a brand new campaign about the events of a possible World War 3 situation? Sign me up.

I understand what COD is going for sacrificing a fair amount of detail (and resolution) to get it playing at a steady 60 fps. Though that's important on console, pretty much all PC games aim for 60fps capability without resolution sacrifices. Actually, even considering the limitations, the developers of MW3 could be doing more to give MW3 a distinct look. I'm not talking crispness, I'm talking about making the guns, weapons and items distinct from shit we have already played and paid for.

Riot Shield and juggernaut, we already seen that. Exploding dogs seem to be just like normal dogs but with "martydom" dropping a grenade after they die you have AMPLE time to escape. They also look identical, nothing cool like a unique dog model strapped with fires and explosives and a big beeping timer. I was thinking of something like Black Ops's explosive RC car but on legs and leaping!

Survival mode may soak up a lot of time but there isn't as much to is as new only not it is not part of a mission.

Yes, the objective based missions of MW2's spec ops are gone, this new mode is just in the same maps used for multiplayer absorbing wave after wave of enemies, it is a lot more like an enhanced Black Ops Combat Training.

http://www.oxm.co.uk/28994/news/mw3-spec-ops-will-help-you-avoid-swearing-8-year-olds/

No more stealth or Room-clearing or other of those unique modes, just Hoard Mode but with COD.

Revamping a lot of stuff cannot be worth $60 plus another $30-$60 for all the map packs to get the entire experience and be 100% up to speed with the rest of the community.

I HATE the multiple map packs, it divides the community. Have one BIG map pack, not many small ones. Even if they aren't all ready, buy one map-pack for $20 and updates add new packs as they are finalised. Ideally, release new maps FOR FREE, like every other serious multilayer game does. If you want to monetise, monetise things like accelerated levelling-up or "rent" weapons that are above your rank.

Dividing a community is bad, especially with COD's matchmaking system you can either be denied connecting to hosts who cycle through new maps, or you get kicked when the base moves to a non-stock map.

Three things: There ARE going to be spec-ops missions similar to MW2's, this is just extra.(not sure where you got the impression there wasn't going to be those, Infinity Ward confirmed there was.) And I remember BO's combat training being plagued impossible AI and being a dumbed down MP experience, this is a whole new mode where you fight off waves of increasingly difficult and varying enemies buying and enhancing equipment to let you survive another round. I love these modes, no matter what game they're in.

Last thing is that I agree with, 15$ is way too expensive for a map-pack that will divide the community between those with, and those without, dlc. I for one find I can enjoy a Call of Duty game without map-packs, especially Modern Warfare games that don't "require" you to have the dlc for many lobbies.

PS. I blame Activision.

My source contradicts your claim.

Do you have a source?

@fourzerotwo
Robert Bowling
@SICK_OFSLUTS Spec Ops Missions are scenarios with win / lose, but Spec Ops Survival is infinite, never ending until you die

That is Infinity Ward creative director Robert Bowling's twitter feed. I remember reading other sources that also confirmed it, but I don't have the time to hunt them down. (I am beginning to doubt myself on this point, but I honestly can forgive them because they said survival on EVERY MP map. Enough variation for me.)

Hmm, a twitter post.

And in this media blow out they have only shown modes with waves of enemies, it really does give the impression that they have been super lazy and just made a generic hoard-mode mechanic to copy-paste onto every multiplayer map.

I'm worried they just won't have the time/capability/motivation to make the spec-ops modes of similar vein as MW2, that is structured mission based with progression and a lot of very unique maps.

We all know how incredibly stretched Infinity Ward are with a very late production and HALF their key talent up sticks and leaving for all the bullshitting Activision gave over paying them for their incredibly valuable contribution.

 

[Sephren468]

Oh, It looks like Modern Warfare 2?

So fucking what? The game still plays better than any console FPS out on the market. The fans of the game know what they want.

Black Ops balanced the game, MW3 will most likely get the hit detection and lag on check. That's pretty much all it needs to do. People seem to forget that these games are actually pretty good

Looks like DLC for MW2. This looks horrible I will not spend money on this when there are so many other good looking games coming out this season. It most likely will be just as broken as MW2. But it will sell millions because sheep love the yearly expansions....

So I'm a sheep because I like Call of Duty games? How about you're a sheep because you have already given your opinion of the game without seeing more than a minute of consecutive gameplay footage.

It's an FPS for christs sakes, what the hell do you expect?

Seriously, Call of Duty haters are the most annoying excuses for life I have ever seen.

Oh, It looks like Modern Warfare 2?

So fucking what? The game still plays better than any console FPS out on the market. The fans of the game know what they want.

Black Ops balanced the game, MW3 will most likely get the hit detection and lag on check. That's pretty much all it needs to do. People seem to forget that these games are actually pretty good

Looks like DLC for MW2. This looks horrible I will not spend money on this when there are so many other good looking games coming out this season. It most likely will be just as broken as MW2. But it will sell millions because sheep love the yearly expansions....

So I'm a sheep because I like Call of Duty games? How about you're a sheep because you have already given your opinion of the game without seeing more than a minute of consecutive gameplay footage.

It's an FPS for christs sakes, what the hell do you expect?

Seriously, Call of Duty haters are the most annoying excuses for life I have ever seen.

Oh, It looks like Modern Warfare 2?

So fucking what? The game still plays better than any console FPS out on the market. The fans of the game know what they want.

Black Ops balanced the game, MW3 will most likely get the hit detection and lag on check. That's pretty much all it needs to do. People seem to forget that these games are actually pretty good

Looks like DLC for MW2. This looks horrible I will not spend money on this when there are so many other good looking games coming out this season. It most likely will be just as broken as MW2. But it will sell millions because sheep love the yearly expansions....

So I'm a sheep because I like Call of Duty games? How about you're a sheep because you have already given your opinion of the game without seeing more than a minute of consecutive gameplay footage.

It's an FPS for christs sakes, what the hell do you expect?

Seriously, Call of Duty haters are the most annoying excuses for life I have ever seen.

I do not "hate" CoD. What I hate is the yearly expansions called new games. CoD 1,2, and 4 are great games. MW2 and Black Ops...not so much. MW2 was a buggy broken mess with no dedicated servers. So no MW2 does not play better than any console fps its actually one of the worst on the market...

 

[Vault boy Eddie]

Why can't they just sell this mode for like 20 bucks without all the suck of story mode and regular glitchfest multiplayer.

 

[MurderousToaster]

At least this time it doesn't look like some **** decides to smear jelly all over your face just for the fun of it when you get shot.