j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:
A few points: firstly, I wasn't really addressing augmentation in Deus Ex, as that's a whole other world with its own rules. The discussion seemed to be more based around the idea of techno-augmentation in real life, so I wanted to make a few points that related that that specific issue, not just to Deus Ex. Therefore, Deus Ex may have hospitals that regularly treat people with mechanical limbs for free, but we have no reason to believe such places would exist in a real life situation.
So you're saying that you're adressing body augmentation in real life, as if it was implemented the exact same way as portrayed by these game trailers, but not as they are portrayed in the game or the trailers? That doesn't make sense.
If you're going to assume that body augmentation in real life is going to be like it is in the game then don't turn around and go the opposite way as soon as that assumption doesn't support your arguments anymore.
j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:
Your point about how the game addresses the tactile issue doesn't actually challenge my argument. If anything, it reinforces it.
I know that, I was actually supporting that one argument of yours with extra knowledge that you might not have had. My intent was not to indiscriminately tear you down, just to inform you of the things you got wrong or where you might have been misinformed.
j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:
Believe it or not, most people who have broken a limb manage to go their whole lives without ever breaking it again. While it takes a while (15-18 months) most bones in most cases do grow back to their original strength. And my point was made more to highlight simply how incredible the human body is: our 'weak' limbs are able to do something that no mechanical limb can ever do. Heal. The fact that a broken arm can mend itself where a mechanical arm has to be fixed by specialists, for me, paints the natural arm by far in the more favourable light.
Sure a human limb might heal itself over time... but an augment can be fully repaired or replaced in a matter of hours/days. Human limbs usually need the help of specialists to heal too, so in my mind the augments are the obvious better choice.
j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:
And lastly, my point was not meant to say that the human body is literally perfect. My point is that the human body has evolved so that every part is working in absolute harmony. The skin lead to the nerves, which are attached to the nervous system, which relays information to the brain, which moves the muscles in response... it's possibly the best example in the natural world of hundreds and hundreds of different mechanisms all working together under one purpose, creating a unified whole. Every single part of your body has its purpose, and it has evolved to fulfil that purpose. That is something that no mechanical limb can ever replace. Your nervous system has evolved around the idea of having two arms and two legs packed full of muscles and nerve receptors with which to recieve information, as well as effect movement and change. It's silly to think that we can simply change that by adding robo-limbs, or indeed to think that by adding more brute 'strength' and 'speed' we've somehow improved on the design.
If a mechanical limb fulfills the same purpose as the original limb and even does it better, then how is that not an improvement on the design?
And if your only argument for why the human body as it is has been developed to where there can be no further improvements is that we have a working nervous system, then I'd say that's a very weak argument... seeing as pretty much every other living organism has that too.
j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:
And regarding your last point: I only ever learned biology up to GCSE standard. Hoever, I've always been interested in the body, and try to read up on it where and when I can. I admit my knowledge is less than fully comprehensive, but I'd still appreciate it if you left the condescending smart-ass attitude at the door.
Alright, I admit my attitude may have been less than desirable, however if you read up enough on the human body you will start to see some massive flaws in the design. And frankly your purist views seem alot like they're based on the same ground principles that religious groups use as a reason not to allow blood-transfusions or other medical practices on people who need them to live... basically the same "don't mess with what we've been given" argument.