Transgenders, Transsexuals, and the Whole Gamut

Recommended Videos

l33t.heathen

New member
Jul 10, 2010
19
0
0
Generic Gamer said:
TheOtter said:
Ignorance is simply not knowing about something. Yes I am ignorant of the particulars of Chron's disease because I have not researched it. I am also ignorant on the culture of central African nations, simply because I do not have detailed knowledge of it.
nekoali said:
I would never fault anyone for lacking knowledge. I know that I am ignorant about far more subjects than ones I have knowledge of. And I know that for most people, transgender issues just never come up, so they have no reason to look into them.
Thing is that neither of these cases are actually 'ignorance'. Ignorance implies that people are choosing not to know something for some reason, never being exposed to a necessity to learn something isn't ignorance. Ignorance implies that they have purposefully avoided learning something so earth-shatteringly important that it's almost unbelievable that they couldn't know it. For example, you can get away without knowing how a PC works in specific terms but it would be sheer ignorance not to realise computers are important.

'Ignorant' is a very loaded word, it's a blame word and on the Internet it's come to mean stupid. It's a passive aggressive stand-in (as is 'uninformed') because if you were to call someone a howling retard you'd be punished. Calling someone ignorant for not understanding a minority condition, especially one that's loaded with as much bad naming as this (mixing in neurological terms and phrases like 'two spirited' and 'genderqueer' which actually mean nothing) just isn't fair.
you know that isn't at all what ignorant means.

Dictionary.com said:
ig·no·rant
adjective /ˈignərənt/ 

Lacking knowledge or awareness in general; uneducated or unsophisticated
- he was told constantly that he was ignorant and stupid

Lacking knowledge, information, or awareness about something in particular
- they were ignorant of astronomy

Discourteous or rude
- this ignorant, pin-brained receptionist

Easily angered
- I is an ignorant man?even police don't meddle with me
[/quote/

you are thinking willful ignorance and that is totally different

regardless i don't feel comfortable with it. If someone is a hermaphrodite and post-op cool whatever i guess but aside from that i'd prefer not to associate with them. I just wouldn't feel comfortable. If i was in a situation where I was forced to associate with them I could be civil but I feel that sexuality is a black or white thing. Love isn't sex. I have plenty of male friends that I love but I have no sexual inclination towards. Modern society pushes the idea that sex is love and that is the be all end all and that is what causes all this confusion in people.
 

Cyrus Hanley

New member
Oct 13, 2010
403
0
0
FreelanceButler said:
I've never actually met one. At least, I'm not aware I have.
I'll admit, if I found out someone I knew was a transgender person, or someone I know went for the operation, I won't deny I'd probably be a little weirded out. But I'm guessing once I get used to them and the whole idea doesn't seem new and strange, I'd be alright with it.
Or maybe I would. I am kinda close minded... Guess we'll cross that bride when we come to it.

But yeah, at the end of the day, it ain't my life. You do what you want and don't worry yourselves about dumbies like me that are weirded out by anything new.

I think I've learnt something about myself with this post.
[sub]Mostly that I'm a jerk...[/sub]
Heh, that was an ironic typo, wasn't it? ;-)
 

Harlemura

Ace Defective
May 1, 2009
3,327
0
0
Cyrus Hanley said:
FreelanceButler said:
I've never actually met one. At least, I'm not aware I have.
I'll admit, if I found out someone I knew was a transgender person, or someone I know went for the operation, I won't deny I'd probably be a little weirded out. But I'm guessing once I get used to them and the whole idea doesn't seem new and strange, I'd be alright with it.
Or maybe I would. I am kinda close minded... Guess we'll cross that bride when we come to it.

But yeah, at the end of the day, it ain't my life. You do what you want and don't worry yourselves about dumbies like me that are weirded out by anything new.

I think I've learnt something about myself with this post.
[sub]Mostly that I'm a jerk...[/sub]
Heh, that was an ironic typo, wasn't it? ;-)
That... Yeah, that looks like an insult. Whups.
Thanks, I'm gonna go fix that before someone takes it the wrong way.
 

TheAceTheOne

New member
Jul 27, 2010
1,106
0
0
Monkfish Acc. said:
It's not my business and I don't care.

Frankly I'm not sure why anyone should. It's not your fucking life. Why is it a big deal to you.
I completely agree. Your answer is my viewpoint on everything in life, basically.
 

cobra_ky

New member
Nov 20, 2008
1,643
0
0
orangecharger said:
My comments were directed to the OP - since you are not the original poster and my questions were about their motivations - why did you decide to respond to my post?
the comments i was responding to weren't directed at anyone in particular. here it is again:

orangecharger said:
All that said - as a gaming lifestyle site, why do topics like this keeping coming up? It would seem this is not the most likely place to go for validation or whatever it is the original poster is seeking. It seems a little out of place and in a way it's kind of like bating the trolls, which is sort of trollish to begin with.
You asked a general question about the Escapist forums, which as a long-time poster i felt qualified to comment on. You also referred to the original poster in the third person, from which i inferred you weren't addressing him directly. You made what i felt were unwarranted assumptions about the OP's motivations, so i shared what i had inferred from his original post and presented them as an alternative.

orangecharger said:
I knew you weren't the OP, but since you decided to speak on their behalf (my questions were not directed to you) I assumed you had been nominated as their surrogate/mouth piece/spokesperson - now that I call you out on that you don't feel you are qualified to speak on their behalf anymore.
This is a fairly unreasonable assumption to make on a public forum where any user may respond to any other. I spoke from my own experience having read his posts here; I can't speak to his activities on other sites because i am not aware of them, nor can i speak for the feelings of all transgendered persons and their supporters.

orangecharger said:
So hey next time when my comments are clearly aimed at the OP and you aren't the OP don't bother answering on their behalf. Unless you are still willing to continue the discourse on their behalf and guess at their motivations. I am done. Just assume that no matter what you write back to me... my response is "Ha. Right! Good one! You are the man now dog!"
The next time you want to clearly direct your comments to the OP, quote the post you are responding to (so that the site will notify them), refer to them in the first person, and if you don't want anyone else to respond, consider sending them a private message instead.
 

Terminal Blue

Elite Member
Legacy
Feb 18, 2010
3,933
1,804
118
Country
United Kingdom
BGH122 said:
I do see where you're coming from and I'm sorry that life has been so unfair to you, but you must also realise that it's just not practical to ask people to essentially ignore their sexual selection criteria?
Oops.. I'm not transgendered myself, and don't want to be seen as speaking for those who are.

I'm an occasional transvestite, sure, but I'm relatively comfortable with my own body and don't seem to have much trouble getting involved with people of either sex. I just know a good number of people for whom its not that easy. It is pretty heartbreaking to watch a close friend consistently have men falling over her only to vanish or react violently when she reveals that, in actually real physical terms, they might need to use lube if they want to have sex.

People don't react like that because they're naturally turned off by lube. They do it because they feel ashamed that they, a heterosexual man of all things, were attracted to a body which happened to be surgically constructed. That shame isn't necessarily innate to people's sexuality.

BGH122 said:
That mightn't be what you meant, I might have read it incorrectly, but it sounds to me like you're asking people to look past what they find attractive. Simply put, that's impossible.
It's not really what I meant, but let's roll with it anyway.

I'm assuming you mean the physical structure of people's post-op (or even pre-op) bodies still? If you mean something else, you might have to explain.

I don't think it's impossible to be flexible even around people's bodies. I think it becomes so if you have an ingrained disgust of anything you wouldn't find in a mens magazine, but we always compromise on some things for the sake of others.

It's not that it shouldn't be a factor, but for most of you it doesn't seem to be about any kind of attraction or otherwise to people's bodies. In fact, it sounds much more like a principle, something which would hold true even if the bodies in question were perfect, and that's something I don't understand at all. It's not something which reflects my experience of sexuality or anything I've actually observed in other people.

To put it bluntly, it seems to be a problem only heterosexuals have. Even most exclusively gay people recognize that there have been point of blurring, points at which their sexuality was tested or the limits pushed, even if it ultimately reinforced their commitment to their homosexuality. They may not talk about those things in public, but they also don't tend to feel anything like the same shame. For this reason, I can't see that shame as a 'natural' part of your sexuality.

Worse, I find it slightly degrading to both you, as a person who is made to feel shame at the mere possibility of 'failing' at heterosexuality, and to me as a person who has already lost that exclusive privilege of being a successful heterosexual. Until you learn not to fear being non-heterosexual, how do you expect those of us who are to feel that you respect us at all?

Ugh, I'm not explaining myself well. Suffice to say that my point wasn't that you should ignore your sexual selection criteria, just to be aware that there might be more to do your sexual selection criteria than meets the eye. Especially if you could theoretically meet someone and progress quite far into a relationship with them before realizing they were transgendered. Heck, you might not necessarily even realize at all - modern surgical techniques aren't that bad.

Monoochrom said:
What I'm getting at with this is, that I'm probably just a bit narrow-minded about transgenders. I'm not doing it on purpose, I don't mean to be hurtful, I just have no actual experience with them and took my opinion pretty much off the top of my head.
I know, and it was totally obvious you weren't malicious.

Malicious people don't want to know or understand anything, they've already made up their mind. You certainly didn't come across as one of those people.
 

nekoali

New member
Aug 25, 2009
227
0
0
Thank you Monoochrom. I really wasn't picking you out because I felt you needed 'a teaching' or anything. But rather that you raised a lot of points that I hear often, and your post was a good jumping point for me to clear up some misconceptions that are sadly common. I apologize if that post was kind of rambling and got off track towards the end... I was quite sick yesterday and it was hard for me to concentrate.

For what it is worth, I can understand many of your reservations. I went through the same inner conflicts myself (from the other side, obviously) after I found out about transgender people and before I came to the decision that I had to transition. And it really was a 'had to' situation.

Most people who aren't that familiar with transsexualism think this is some choice that we make. "Oh, I think I'll be a woman now." I never thought that. And I never met anyone who was really transsexual who thought that. In fact, anyone who told me they did think that, I would tell them to seriously think about what they want. Being trans, of any variety, is a hard road that lasts you entire lifetime. The honest fact is.. I don't want to be transsexual. But I can't live as a man, as my biology tells me. The discomfort is to great, even the thought of going back makes me ill now. So no, it wasn't a choice. My only choice was do I transition, or do I kill myself and hope for a better reincarnation next time.

And I have sacrificed a lot to be where I am. My family, my home, friends, potential lovers and a lot of time and money. There is also the certainty that I will lose more in the future for being who I am. And to be honest, I have moved from being one of the most privileged groups in the US, the while male, to one of the most misunderstood and threatened, the transgender woman. And I wouldn't give it up, because it means I am finally myself and finally happy with my life, despite all of that. Up until then, I was absolutely miserable all the time.

Now to get to the point... I know, I'm long winded. Despite all of what I said before, there are things I regret. I do worry about what people may think of me. Both on a personal level, and on a safety level. Sure, I live in a pretty liberal town and nearly everyone I meet is accepting, even sometimes welcoming to me. But all it takes is one person or one group to take a violent dislike to me. And it is always a major consideration of myself as to any place I visit and especially if I am thinking of moving there. How friendly and open are they, and how likely is it that I will be attacked?

A big thing is children... I find it very depressing that I will never be able to have children. I never wanted them before transition. The idea of being a 'father' is... repulsive to me, really. Yet to be a mother... What I wouldn't give... I love children, and it would be nice one day if I could adopt, or get into a relationship and become a stepmother to their children. But not being able to have children of my own fills me with sadness. But everything has it's price. This just happens to be one involved in transition now.
 

BGH122

New member
Jun 11, 2008
1,307
0
0
evilthecat said:
People don't react like that because they're naturally turned off by lube. They do it because they feel ashamed that they, a heterosexual man of all things, were attracted to a body which happened to be surgically constructed. That shame isn't necessarily innate to people's sexuality.
It seems to me that there's an awful lot of presumption going on here. I don't think it's wise to presume the cause of others' motives unless there's some strong scientific evidence for the presumption. If there's proof that some vague notion of heterosexuality and gender identity is the cause here then I'd be happy to hear it, but it seems more likely to me that they're avoiding the transgendered for the same reason people get iffy if one tells them one has a brain cyst or some such ailment: people tend to be naturally sexually repulsed by infirmity.

evilthecat said:
It's not really what I meant, but let's roll with it anyway.

I'm assuming you mean the physical structure of people's post-op (or even pre-op) bodies still? If you mean something else, you might have to explain.
No, not necessarily the physical. In the same way that a given personality can break a sexual relationship if it doesn't tie in with one's sexual selection criteria, so too could the mere fact that one is transgendered if that's against one's partner's criteria. Saying "But it's no big deal!" isn't very effective if to the beholder it is a big deal.

evilthecat said:
I don't think it's impossible to be flexible even around people's bodies. I think it becomes so if you have an ingrained disgust of anything you wouldn't find in a mens magazine, but we always compromise on some things for the sake of others.
Blaming porn seems like a cop-out. I agree that the vast majority of our gender identities are socially learned and so it follows that, at least to some degree, sexual selection criteria must be socially learned too. However, it also stands to reason that at lest some of our sexual selection criteria must be evolutionarily fixed because the species from which we've speciated lacked the advanced social learning that current humans posses (there's even good evidence that the progenitors of the Homo genus, Homo Habilis, lacked even basic weaponry abilities or the ability to form hunting parties). Since breeding did occur in our recent ancestors without socially learned sexual selection criteria then it follows that we must have some non-learned sexual selection criteria that are evolutionarily fixed.

evilthecat said:
It's not that it shouldn't be a factor, but for most of you it doesn't seem to be about any kind of attraction or otherwise to people's bodies. In fact, it sounds much more like a principle, something which would hold true even if the bodies in question were perfect, and that's something I don't understand at all. It's not something which reflects my experience of sexuality or anything I've actually observed in other people.

To put it bluntly, it seems to be a problem only heterosexuals have. Even most exclusively gay people recognize that there have been point of blurring, points at which their sexuality was tested or the limits pushed, even if it ultimately reinforced their commitment to their homosexuality. They may not talk about those things in public, but they also don't tend to feel anything like the same shame. For this reason, I can't see that shame as a 'natural' part of your sexuality.

Worse, I find it slightly degrading to both you, as a person who is made to feel shame at the mere possibility of 'failing' at heterosexuality, and to me as a person who has already lost that exclusive privilege of being a successful heterosexual. Until you learn not to fear being non-heterosexual, how do you expect those of us who are to feel that you respect us at all?
Firstly, I know you're annoyed at the situation, fairly so, but I'd rather you not direct that annoyance at me as if I ought to apologise for a crime I've never committed. I'm me, not all heterosexual males. Your argument is starting to sound very 'you people' and to lump entire groups together like that is intellectually lazy. I sincerely doubt you'd address a black person as 'you blacks'. However, I'm sure you intended no offence.

To be honest, I suspect the reason that (if true) heterosexuals are less likely to experiment with paraphilia than those of non-standard sexual orientation is much the same reason that people who sample minor illegal substances are more likely to go on to take more serious illegal substances than those who never took any at all: once one has broken the taboo once then there's little stopping one from doing so again.

However, there's a massive leap of logic from that position to 'all straight men fear all non-straight people'. This isn't the 50s. Unless one is from a really backwater town then this position just doesn't ring true. Out of my friends, roughly one third are of a non-standard sexual orientation, be it homosexual, bisexual or genderqueer (admittedly, gender issues are divorced from sexuality, but I'm lumping them in for ease of writing). I don't fear those with non-standard sexual orientations and I don't know anyone (outside of the lower-class community) who does.

There is a giant leap of logic from 'I don't find you attractive for whatever physical or psychological reason' to 'I don't find you attractive because I fear you'.

evilthecat said:
Ugh, I'm not explaining myself well. Suffice to say that my point wasn't that you should ignore your sexual selection criteria, just to be aware that there might be more to do your sexual selection criteria than meets the eye. Especially if you could theoretically meet someone and progress quite far into a relationship with them before realizing they were transgendered. Heck, you might not necessarily even realize at all - modern surgical techniques aren't that bad.
I've answered this point above, so I'll briefly reiterate: Infirmity is off putting. If trangenderism is viewed by an individual as an infirmity then it will be off putting. This isn't due to some evil of heterosexuality, this is due to millions upon millions of years of evolution teaching us to avoid mates who can't bear or look after our young.
 

orangecharger

New member
Nov 13, 2009
200
0
0
cobra_ky said:
orangecharger said:
My comments were directed to the OP - since you are not the original poster and my questions were about their motivations - why did you decide to respond to my post?
the comments i was responding to weren't directed at anyone in particular. here it is again:

orangecharger said:
All that said - as a gaming lifestyle site, why do topics like this keeping coming up? It would seem this is not the most likely place to go for validation or whatever it is the original poster is seeking. It seems a little out of place and in a way it's kind of like bating the trolls, which is sort of trollish to begin with.
You asked a general question about the Escapist forums, which as a long-time poster i felt qualified to comment on. You also referred to the original poster in the third person, from which i inferred you weren't addressing him directly. You made what i felt were unwarranted assumptions about the OP's motivations, so i shared what i had inferred from his original post and presented them as an alternative.

orangecharger said:
I knew you weren't the OP, but since you decided to speak on their behalf (my questions were not directed to you) I assumed you had been nominated as their surrogate/mouth piece/spokesperson - now that I call you out on that you don't feel you are qualified to speak on their behalf anymore.
This is a fairly unreasonable assumption to make on a public forum where any user may respond to any other. I spoke from my own experience having read his posts here; I can't speak to his activities on other sites because i am not aware of them, nor can i speak for the feelings of all transgendered persons and their supporters.

orangecharger said:
So hey next time when my comments are clearly aimed at the OP and you aren't the OP don't bother answering on their behalf. Unless you are still willing to continue the discourse on their behalf and guess at their motivations. I am done. Just assume that no matter what you write back to me... my response is "Ha. Right! Good one! You are the man now dog!"
The next time you want to clearly direct your comments to the OP, quote the post you are responding to (so that the site will notify them), refer to them in the first person, and if you don't want anyone else to respond, consider sending them a private message instead.
"Ha. Right! Good one! You are the man now dog!"
 

hexFrank202

New member
Mar 21, 2010
303
0
0
Kukulski said:
SuperMse said:
Not my case, but I pass for a woman verrrrrry well. I'm currently in a very happy relationship with a lesbian who considers me just as much of a woman as someone who was born a girl.
Say hello to Mr. Hat for me.
Auh!!! Ohh!!!! STINGGG!!!

I mean seriously, if they perma-banned the guy above you for his comment, they should have MURDERED you!
 

Thespian42

New member
Apr 5, 2009
111
0
0
I view Transsexuals and Transgenders much in the same way I view people who enjoy eating mushrooms; I have no objection to it in any way, and I fully support them if that's what makes them happy, it just confuses me.