Two Year Old Toddler Smoking Pot

[Willis_D]

I have conflicting opinions on pot, but that is when it concerns adults, teens, or my friends.

But, THIS is just really, REALLY bad. As others have pointed out, this can fuck up a child for life. They have yet to fully develop, so this can be even more harmful then it would be to a fully grown person. I'm not going to write more, as others have already, and in a better way then I could.

Man, that story has annoyed me.

 

[Starke]

I don't support it but I do understand why some do.

And yet another person to block.

Boy is my list hefty.

Eugenics =/= freedom.

Freedom > everything else.

/blocked

Don't reply.

I don't care.

If you don't care what other people have to say then you shouldn't try to contribute to any discussion.

Just sayin'

I care about what they have to say, right up until the point when they say something incredibly ridiculous, like eugenics not being a bad idea.

Funny thing, because someone we all know and whatever wrote something like this:

Tobacco kills more people than

Heroin
Crack
and Cocaine

[HEADING=3]Combined[/HEADING]

Pot has never killed anyone.

Ever.

Never ever has anyone ever died from pot. Period.

The more you know.

Except one of those is patently false. Heroin (by itself) is one of the only "hard drugs" that has no long term health repercussions from use. Now, Heroin is frequently laced with strychnine as a byproduct of shitty production techniques, and you can OD on it, but the actual death rate from heroin itself is pretty fuckin' low.

Oh, right, and chemically, heroin and pot are in the same drug family. They affect the brain in basically the same way. The difference is one is a hell of a lot more potent.

Then again, since you're counting cocaine twice, I guess that makes up for it?

Now, run along and post your "blocked ololol" response because you can't think of a rebuttal that's more urbane.

 

[rokkolpo]

11 years is way to much for a little gag like that.

 

[flaming_squirrel]

Psychoactive effects of pot CAN have long term mental effects.

Nope.

I challenge you to find a single study that supports this claim.

No such study exists.

You go on buying into the government's fear campaign - they wouldn't want you to believe a harmless herb they don't tax could be beneficial, after all.

You've not met many long-term stoners have you? Either that or you're in denial.

Whether or not it helps bring out more severe psychological conditions I'm unsure of, but it sure as hell influences mental capabilities over time.

 

[Mr Pantomime]

Also, Pot is actually more harmful than Cigarettes.

Wait, wtf? care to back that up?

I was wrong....forgive me

 

[Miroku2235]

Better get your tin foil hats people, the government is beaming fear into our BRAINS man!

 

[Boris Goodenough]

Mushrooms are just a vegetable aren't they?

They are fungus, genetically and biochemically they are more similar to us than plants.

 

[Chrinik]

I think it´s cute.
Serriously, the parents should know best what is right and what is wrong, so if this chick thinks that giving pot to a toddler to shut it up is an awesome thing to do, then way to go, raise your kids your way, I´m not obliqued to follow >.<
But I laugh at the videos that come from it...
I also found the little indo-child cute.

To the pot topic...friend of mine, 32, has a child now, has smoked pot from when he was 16 or so onwards...not only brought the contact to pot selling people into contact with harder drugs, he is also serriously thin and has almost no muscle, because high doses of pot make you forget about eating...this is the reason why you get a food-flash once it starts to wear down.
Also, that guy is a serrious addict to alcohol, pot, and everything you can snort.
Also, unless you use a bong or pipe, pot is NOT HARMLESS...because you usually mix it with tobacco anyway to smoke it<.<
I´ve never seen anyone build a joint completely out of pot...would be too expensive anyway.

Oh and yea, the cost factor...it is not taxed, but still costs more then fucking tobacco...

Smoking hallucinogens CANNOT be less harmfull then cancersticks, so I stick to cancersticks...don´t wanna run into a bus because I think it´s a cuddly teddybear or something XD...I´´ve done enough serrious shit when drunk.
DRUGS ARE BAD! It´s just that some drugs are accepted in the community.

 

[razer17]

Psychoactive effects of pot CAN have long term mental effects.

Nope.

I challenge you to find a single study that supports this claim.

No such study exists.

You go on buying into the government's fear campaign - they wouldn't want you to believe a harmless herb they don't tax could be beneficial, after all.

Yes, I buy into the government fear campaign /sarcasm.

Seriously though, a lot of substances in large quantities can have an ill effect on your body. I'm not saying that smoking weed is going to give you mental illness. Hell, most people that smoke weed, even everyday, probably won't. All I am saying is that correlational studies have shown a slight increase in mental illness for those who smoke weed.

It isn't particularly harmful, in fact the smoke is likely to harm you long before the THC etc. ever does. If you don't smoke weed, but cook with it, chances are you'll never see any long term effect. I don't but into government fear mongering. I think most drugs should be legal, especially weed, Ecstasy and coke. Mushrooms, too. I think that people should be able to choose, especially with pot and E, which are much less harmful than alcohol.

And of course, the taxation would be brilliant, as would the fact that dodgey drug dealers would be out of a job, and that if it was legal it wouldn't be cut with dangerous stuff. If it was legal people could openly get help, too, for more harmful drugs. Plus we would have less people in prison for drugs offences, taking the burden off the justice system.

 

[Hashime]

Funny, considering no one has ever died from pot.

Ever.

Oh wait, that's right, it's not taxed.

Go back to drinking and smoking, people, nothing to see here.

You provide no evidence, thus I cannot believe your statement. Do you mean from THC poisoning? From the cancer caused be inhaling ash? Accidents while under the influence? From other drugs introduced through pot? From street gang and drug cartel actions motivated by the selling of pot? From adverse reactions to additives in the drug? Or even through secondary consequences caused by actions taken both sober and not?
Saying no one has ever died from pot means nothing unless you define what your actual meaning is, and in any case is demonstrably false.

 

[Chronologger]

Despite being an avid pot smoker, I do find this quite unsettling, smoking pot should be a choice, and obviously, the child being 2 years old didn't understand what was happening, effectively this is robbing the child of it's freedom to choose later on in life as an adult.

The mother should be punished, but at the same time the child needs to be taken care of, if the father's around, I hope he is a better parent.

 

[Lucifron]

Funny, considering no one has ever died from pot.

Ever.

Oh wait, that's right, it's not taxed.

Go back to drinking and smoking, people, nothing to see here.

Funny, considering that studies have shown that if you smoke when below the age of 14, your brain becomes fucked up. Clinical studies of mice have shown the exact same thing when juvenile mice were stoned.

In short, this is not cool.