Two Year Old Toddler Smoking Pot

[JoJo]

11 years is way to much for a little gag like that.

Seriously? You think giving potentially harmful illegal drugs to a toddler is a "gag"?

 

[Starke]

11 years is way to much for a little gag like that.

Seriously? You think giving potentially harmful illegal drugs to a toddler is a "gag"?

Wouldn't "gag" be an indicator of intent in this case, and not an assessment of the severity? (With "little" being the utter failure to grasp the severity.)

 

[Daystar Clarion]

There is a direct correlation showing that stupid people do stupid things. It's proven by science!

 

[DefunctTheory]

Wait, they dosed autistic children with marijuana? What the fuck? How do you even get that past a review board?

I'd be more worried about the kid jabbing herself with the roach than with her becoming an addict, unless you're referring to a long term effect on their mental development... which would be a legitimate concern, I guess.

That is indeed what I'm talking about. Sure, smoking weed wont make you intellectually handicapped, but the things you missed while being stoned might just do that. In an adult, you can just go back and reread the book later. In a child, that can put you years behind your peers.

But in a 2 year old... Jesus. The kid is learning new things EVERYDAY. And it doesn't just apply to 'book learning.' Studies done a decade ago on the use of marijuana on autistic children showed a decrease in both book learning and social skills learning: basically, what little ability autistic children had to socialize was being lost. I can only speculate that it would do something similar to a normal child.

Sorry to chim in, a study I saw found that Nicontin(as in they used the patch) Reduced the effect of down sydrome and Austism. Not that has anything to do with pot, its just I thought It was an interesting fact. Oh and I don't belive pot can reduce mental capicty but it can make it harder to learn and such and cause short term memory loss.

So again, toddles shouldn't be taking any kind of recreational drug.

EDIT:Some grammar kind of.

They've found dozens of uses for nicotine that are beneficial. None of them, however, can overcome the fact that its highly addictive.

I read somewhere that the creation of a synthetic nicotine that has no addiction would be a godsend to medicine, even if not applied to tobacco products.

 

[Quiet Stranger]

SNIP

If you're going to post a rebuttal, at least form proper sentences and use English.

I couldn't be bothered arguing with you.

You're blocked.

Don't reply.

I don't care.

Message recieved. Im kinda dissapointed, i love a good debate, its a chance for me to explore views from a different angle. Im sad you had to behave so agressively to what i wanted to be a good little dicussion. Never mind. Not everyone who disagrees with you is your enemy. Calm down a little. Its not a big deal. My english wasnt that bad in my rebuttle no? Maybe i should proof read it first. Thanks for teh feed back ^.^

I read your rebuttal and quite enjoyed it

On topic: crazy wino ***** mother

 

[monkey_man]

Also, blocking someone who replies sensibly and politely is the forum equivelant of sticking your fingers in your ears and going "LALALALALAALLALLA I CANT HEAR YOU" which is something people expect from a fucking 5 year old.

Just sayin'

or a 2 year old on pot :3
i am sorry couldn't I resist
jokes aside, the mother deserves to be in jail, but living without a mother is also quite livechanging...

 

[rokkolpo]

11 years is way to much for a little gag like that.

Seriously? You think giving potentially harmful illegal drugs to a toddler is a "gag"?

toddler on drugs really ins't that big a deal.

the fact that it is cannabis makes it even less impressive for me, since it's less dangerous than for example tabacco.

this means nothing to me, but a stupid little gag.
(but that's just my opinion)

 

[JoJo]

11 years is way to much for a little gag like that.

Seriously? You think giving potentially harmful illegal drugs to a toddler is a "gag"?

Wouldn't "gag" be an indicator of intent in this case, and not an assessment of the severity? (With "little" being the utter failure to grasp the severity.)

Maybe that's what he meant, though from my point of view she deserves every one of those 11 years. I just hope that little girl gets given a more responsible carer now.

 

[Daystar Clarion]

Eh, I'm treating this with the level of seriousness that it deserves.
If someone comes into a thread and starts blocking anyone who makes an arguement against her I doubt I'm gonna bother treating her in a serious manner.

Seeing as Cassita got herself suspended, would you please consider making the effort to raise the level of debate in the thread now?

Ok, if you want my serious input.

On the topic of the arrogant, stubborn user:
People like her, from what I see of her, desire far too great a level of freedom.
They think everyone should be able to do what they want and that would lead to a dangerous, chaotic and very disorganised society.

She also despises the organisation that runs her country, that made sure she was born in a safe environment, that she got at the very least a basic education, that she lived in a safe society (to the best of their abilities) and you know where I'm going with this.

She's also those type of liberals that think anyone that is less liberal then they are, are evil and with me being a Fascist, I have not had good dealings with them in the past so...let's just say I'm not fond of them

She can't handle anyone whom disagrees with her and just blocks them which is the internet equivalency of shouting in someone's face and then blcoking your ears going "lalalala I can't hear you".

On the topic of the OP:
What the mother did was extremly cruel to the child, to force a habit on someone you are supposed to be taking care of is severly wrong and in doing so the mother has proven that she is unfit to look after her child.

Nice imput, and while I disagree with facism, at least it has a level of common sense to it. I consider myself a liberal, but pure 'I should be allowed to do anything I want' libertarian bullshit is further up on my list of things that piss me off. Right next to zealous vegetarians/vegans and putting pineapple on pizza.

 

[Starke]

11 years is way to much for a little gag like that.

Seriously? You think giving potentially harmful illegal drugs to a toddler is a "gag"?

Wouldn't "gag" be an indicator of intent in this case, and not an assessment of the severity? (With "little" being the utter failure to grasp the severity.)

Maybe that's what he meant, though from my point of view she deserves every one of those 11 years. I just hope that little girl gets given a more responsible carer now.

Agreed.

 

[JoJo]

11 years is way to much for a little gag like that.

Seriously? You think giving potentially harmful illegal drugs to a toddler is a "gag"?

toddler on drugs really ins't that big a deal.

the fact that it is cannabis makes it even less impressive for me, since it's less dangerous than for example tabacco.

this means nothing to me, but a stupid little gag.
(but that's just my opinion)

Drugs are illegal for a reason, whether it's the best way to tackle them is another matter of course.

Cannabis use has been assessed by several studies to be correlated with the development of anxiety, psychosis, and depression.

Here's a quote from Wikipedia which I thought would help show why I think (in my opinion) that giving a child drugs is a terrible crime. At least if an adult is a user they make the choice for themselves.

 

[blindthrall]

While I don't think pot is as harmful as the government (or lots of people on this board) says, giving it to a toddler is criminal, since it could severely fuck that kid's brain up. When the brain is still developing, stuff like that could turn the kid into a retard. I'm not sure she deserves 11 years, but some jail time is probably necessary. IF she was actually trying to get the child to inhale. If she just took a picture of it holding the joint, like those pictures of toddlers with 40 bottles under their arms while they're asleep, well then she's just negligent. Doesn't deserve the kid, but doesn't deserve jail time either. I doubt the kid would even know how to inhale anyway.

How would you feel if it was a cigarette? It's not going to fuck up their brain, but it could get them hooked for life.

 

[Miroku2235]

Funny, considering no one has ever died from pot.

Ever.

Oh wait, that's right, it's not taxed.

Go back to drinking and smoking, people, nothing to see here.

Wow they suspended you for this. Censorship, since this added to the discussion and wasn't flaming anybody.

No, they suspended her for being a twat and blocking anyone who disagreed with her point of view, and making a post to advertise that she had blocked them.

 

[Willis_D]

Funny, considering no one has ever died from pot.

Ever.

Oh wait, that's right, it's not taxed.

Go back to drinking and smoking, people, nothing to see here.

Wow they suspended you for this. Censorship, since this added to the discussion and wasn't flaming anybody.

Read all her posts dude. It all contributed. They just used that one because it started it all off. She's been doing this in other threads too.

 

[garfoldsomeoneelse]

The tobacco-smoking toddler was far more upsetting. If a baby wants to get high, let it.

 

[Xojins]

I don't think pot is bad, but you definitely shouldn't be giving it to your 2-year-old child. She should have the child taken away from her.

 

[Dr. Whiggs]

I actually think the only way the war on drugs will ever be won is to legalize everything, but monitor it closely and put the money into making it all safe and educate people in its dangers.

People always say this and I must point out that legal drugs are still abused (Rxs, alcohol, tobacco) despite education, and that there is still a black market for cigarettes and prescriptions.

 

[blindthrall]

Funny, considering no one has ever died from pot.

Ever.

Oh wait, that's right, it's not taxed.

Go back to drinking and smoking, people, nothing to see here.

Wow they suspended you for this. Censorship, since this added to the discussion and wasn't flaming anybody.

No, they suspended her for being a twat and blocking anyone who disagreed with her point of view, and making a post to advertise that she had blocked them.

Funny, considering no one has ever died from pot.

Ever.

Oh wait, that's right, it's not taxed.

Go back to drinking and smoking, people, nothing to see here.

Wow they suspended you for this. Censorship, since this added to the discussion and wasn't flaming anybody.

Read all her posts dude. It all contributed. They just used that one because it started it all off. She's been doing this in other threads too.

Sorry, I posted the first before I read them all. It was justified.