Wicky_42 said:
How do China and North Korea keep their populations in check? They monitor them and prevent them from receiving anything that differs from the party line. Now, suppose that a less than congenial government came into power in Britain with the power to monitor and record EVERYONE in the country's communications - they would have the ability to completely manipulate and suppress the population. They would be able to see what political sites you visited, monitor your funds, profile you, and, when they were ready, excise the portions of the population that didn't suit them.
You're right, if a totalitarian government got into power, then I'm sure they'd use the monitoring of the internet to achieve all their evil doings. But you need to realise that if said government got into power in the first place, then I'm sure they'd implement this kind of system if it wasn't already there anyway. Plus, the UK government is just not rich enough to fund a civil service capable of doing this.
Wicky_42 said:
In an extreme time (say, economic collapse, or the outbreak of a virulent virus (or both >.>)) extreme parties can potentially gain power...
I think it'll take something like the plot of
Children of Men for this to happen. Which is so far-fetched it's not worth considering. And it would be rather difficult for a government to justify a statement like "in order to take care of this virus/economy/both we will have to put all the minorities in concentration camps". British politics has become duller and duller, and even with Moneygedon on our hands (as Charlie Brooker calls it) the response by opposing parties has been the political equivalent of beige. And I don't expect it to get any more interesting.
Wicky_42 said:
Hell, even if this whole extreme doom-and-gloom thing is far fetched, I don't want my every activity monitored.
Fair enough.
Wicky_42 said:
It is people like you, Overlord_Dave, who are part of the problem - too short-sighted to see potential problems looming until it's too late.
I strongly, but respectfully, disagree. I'm not being short-sighted. I'm just being realistic. America monitors the
entire internet (since it owns all the major servers), and last time I checked USA citizens weren't being hunted down by the secret police.
When I talked about how expensive a 1984 government would be, I meant that due to the shear man-power required to monitor every citizen, any government, even an 'evil' one, would realise money is MUCH better spent elsewhere. As I mentioned before, the government just wouldn't have enough money to fund a big enough civil service. Especially during economic crisis.
Being totalitarian is just not worth the effort. China only manages it because it's got a sixth of the world's population to hire, the majority of citizens are still 'off-grid' and can't be monitored anyway, and the Party is spectacularly loaded. Compare that to the UK?
I think this all boils down to: if some sort of totalitarian/communist/1984-style government gets into power in the UK in my lifetime...
I'll eat my hat.
...
Or get a nice job in the Ministry of Information. After all, when in Rome...
EDIT:
lava_lamp said:
it is right
the internet is public domain
its like the streets
Exactly.