Irridium said:
Isn't Cameron the guy who's butchering the UK's health system (NHS, I believe it's called) and who is also cutting funding for schools?
How the hell can he possibly say he's protecting the children with a straight face?
One can argue that cutting spending is helping your children and grandchildren not have massive crushing unmanageable debt that they will never ever be able to afford.
Or that throwing more money at systems that are inefficient, wasteful is not ever going to make then better just more inefficient and wasteful. One of the major lies of politics is tossing more money at something is ever the solution.
Everyone needs to tighten their belts period, with us having in the order of 17 trillion in debt over here, a 1 plus trillion massive health bill kicking in, social security and medicare going bankrupt to the tune of 4 trillion dollars, our midwest aquifers drying out at alarming rates, how will our children be able to afford anything when their tax burdens would need to be 100% to pay anything.
And that all utterly ignores the fact that our government will more than likely lose our IMF status soonish before most of that happens collapsing our goverment overnight.
Yes we all better get used to less government and the sooner the better, but on the flip side maybe we can cut back or eliminate that 40% federal tax burdenand let people keep their own money for health care and food and stuff people really need.
If we want to talk about real meaningful health care get the bureaucracy out of health care, enact tort reform where simple mistakes do not cost doctors massive amounts in malpractice insurance. Medicare and medicade paperwork, 20 hour plus work shifts and the insurance costs for doctors do more to skyrocket medical costs than anything.