Agreed.Sixcess said:I'm not.Caffeine_Bombed said:I'm all for blocking access to rape and child porn
Because I don't know what they mean by 'rape porn',and I doubt they know either.
Pretty much every 'rape porn' movie on the internet would be better described as badly-acted-and-unconvincingly-rough-for-the-first-few-minutes porn... but based on the way the government defined 'extreme' porn a few years ago I expect a vague and dangerously broad definition for 'rape' porn. If neither the government, nor the police, nor judges nor juries are exact in their definition then people will have their lives ruined when they go on the sex offender list and/or go to jail for possession of entirely consensual pornography.
Though I find it distasteful, personally, 'rape porn' is a scary sounding headline well picked for political weight, but in practice, it is 99% consenting adults performing BDSM scenes, their success with the audience reliant on a convincing illusion of it being non-consensual. It's an edgy, taboo fantasy affair, for the most part.
Real instances of it have been called out by both the victims and the ethical participants of the audience that consume such material, with video evidence ready for court. Commerical porno sites are a business and hosting illegal material is an express invitation to getting shut down, or worse, having their assests frozen and arrested for criminal conspirarcy. They police themselves.