Jazoni89 said:
PhiMed said:
Jazoni89 said:
Here's some very unpopular opinions.
- Atari Jaguar, and the 3DO for that matter I feel are truly underrated systems that don't derserve the flak they get.
- I'm not too fussed about a story in a game as long as the gameplay is good.
- Even though i don't do it, I feel Emulation has done a whole world of good for the gaming community in general.
- I feel Metroid Other M is a decent game overall, perhaps even better than the Prime sequels in some cases.
- The only Bioware games i have enjoyed are the first two Mass Effects, and Jade Empire.
- I feel videogames can be enjoyed just like any other media by anyone regardless of age, and sex.
- Final Fantasy VIII was the best in the series in my opinion. It had more interesting things going on in it.
- If you consider Ocarina of Time as a bad game, I don't consider you a hardcore gamer in my humble opinion.
If you wear the term "hardcore gamer" as some sort of badge of honor, and view yourself as someone who gets to decide to is allowed in the club, then you deserve every bit of social ostracism, rejection, and failure that you reap. You earned it.
On topic:
-The reason the first Halo became popular is because it was the first console FPS that wasn't a broken mess.
-Fallout 3 sucked.
-Quantity of content does not equal quality. Some really long games are shit. Some really short games are awesome. I have no problem paying full price for a short, good game.
-We are paying less, when adjusted for inflation, for our games than we ever have. Especially when you consider how much they cost to produce.
-User-generated content, with very few exceptions, sucks.
-I have no desire for "realism" when I'm playing a shooter or a sports game. None.
-
Sorry man, but that's kinda harsh.
It's just my view, Ocarina of Time is a seminal masterpiece, and people hating on it just feels wrong to me.
If it's not your cup of tea, I'm fine with that, it's just calling it a bad game, and extremely flawed on a gameplay standpoint seems like that gamer is voided of any respect for gaming. Maybe causing the whole Casual vs Hardcore debate is silly over just one game, but I don't know what else to associate it with.
It's like if someone hated Star Wars and the Godfather, as a film buff you should at least respect them even though they are not your thing. As they did so much for the media in general.
I know my views are controversial, but at least you know a little bit of reason behind my madness. Whenever or not you think that's a legitimate reason it's up to you, but please don't personally attack me for my opinions thank you.
I wasn't personally attacking anyone. I was taking issue with a statement that you made.
A personal attack would be attacking a quality inherent to you over which you have no control, or a circumstance from your past that is unrelated to the topic at hand. My critique was very much related to your comment.
I just really dislike it when someone attempts to make themselves out to be some sort of gatekeeper for the secret club of
"hardcore gamer" (rawwwwrrrr), because it's inherently judgmental and kinda dickish. I have no issue with your opinion on
Ocarina. I like
Ocarina. I liked it a lot better when it first came out, and the primitive polygons didn't hurt my brain, but I like it. I was taking issue with your decision to judge other people's habits and preferences, and the fact that you were declaring the right to decide which meaningless labels people apply to themselves.
Referring to oneself as a hardcore gamer, besides being pointless, is not something that should be considered to be inherently positive or negative. Playing a lot of video games is fine. I do it, but it's not something on which I pride myself, because I have actual real-life achievements for that. But if someone considers themselves "hardcore", who cares? Why does that one game... that
ONE GAME have any bearing on their ability to do so? It's
one game, and it's not even the best Zelda game (that would be
Link to the Past). Besides, younger players likely have difficulty looking past the ugly polygons of the N64/PSONE era, because they were awkward and ugly, especially considering the elegant simplicity of the representation of the 8-bit era, the beautiful sprites of the 16-bit era, and the vastly superior, infinitely less buggy renderings of subsequent generations.
Ultimately, of course recognition of landmarks and significant achievements of the past is important, and I don't think
anyone would argue that
Ocarina is anything other than a masterful achievement of the past. But must someone claim that they actually enjoy those landmarks today? To use your analogy to film, in order to be a "film buff", do you have to claim that you still enjoy Metropolis, or can someone recognize its importance while still admitting it's a little hard to watch after being exposed to modern film-making techniques (and... you know... "talkies")? In film as in video games, there's a word for people who require that you profess a love for antiquated, awkward relics from previous eras in order to be a "true" connoisseur of the medium: snobs. Don't be a snob, dude. Alienation and exclusion are not good for the medium.