Update: Rumor: Ubisoft Cancels Wii U Version of Watch_Dogs

Recommended Videos

Brian Tams

New member
Sep 3, 2012
919
0
0
Strazdas said:
Soooo Watchdogs will be on WiiU. which means it can run on WiiU hardware. which means its not going to be even half of what is advertised. which means the only game i was waiting for can be scrached off the list.
Sigh.
1.) Watch_Dogs is also being released on the PS3 and Xbox 360. If anything is going to keep it from being "even half of what is advertised", it would be that reason.

2.) You seem to be under the impression that the Wii U has weaker hardware that the 360 and PS3. That is absolutely false. Multiple Devs have said that the Wii U easily surpasses the PS3 and 360. Its the Xbone and PS4 that its going to have trouble keeping up with.

3.) Bitching about a game being released on a console you don't like is childish.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,519
5,335
118
Dexterity said:
Wait wait wait. What? How would this be a major blow? It's not going to be a system shipper at all. Only people who already Wii Us are going to buy this game, even then, people like me will probably buy them on other consoles, because I don't want to play it on my Wii U.
Why would you not want to play it on the Wii-U? And why are you assuming nobody else would? People obviously bought the system for games, and if one of the biggest new releases were to get cancelled for it, then that's a major blow. Because it would mean a major third-party developer figures it's not worth it to put their games on this particular system. Now thankfully this didn't happen with Ubisoft, but don't pretend like it wouldn't be a big deal if it did.

Major blows to the console would be if Bayonetta 2 or Smash Bros 4 got cancelled, or something to that effect.
That wouldn't be a major blow, that would be a death sentence.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,519
5,335
118
Dexterity said:
The Wii U doesn't need third party games to be a viable console.
Uh, yes it does. Maybe not for you since you like Nintendo games, but it seems obvious that the Wii-U can't survive on the hardcore Nintendo fanbase alone. There's plenty of gamers out there that want more than just the standard run of Mario and Zelda titles, or maybe even want none of it.

I'm sure there's loads of 3DS owners out there who don't care for Mario, Zelda, or Pokemon, but they still bought one because it has third-party support.
 

tstorm823

Elite Member
Legacy
Aug 4, 2011
7,660
978
118
Country
USA
Strazdas said:
So your saying they are going to recode whole game for each system to use the extra power meaningfully? That would be a first.
So what you're saying is that Call of Duty games on PS3 and Xbox are the same as on the wii? Sure.

OT: Dear Escapist,

When you slightly misquote someone or have an incorrect statistic, you add a little note at the bottom.

When the entire article is proven false, the update saying so better be the first thing people see after the title.

Fix it.
 

Aiddon_v1legacy

New member
Nov 19, 2009
3,672
0
0
CriticKitten said:
So, yes, I reject your ridiculous claim that Watch_Dogs being on the Wii U is somehow creating a "limitation" to the game. Especially since the only core argument you can make (that it means less resources are available on the hardware front) has more to do with the fact that the game is also a 360/PS3 title than the fact that it's on the Wii U. You literally cannot make this argument without explaining why you're okay with the game being on the PS3 and 360. And even if you manage to make that case without being a hypocrite (which I doubt), it's still ridiculous to ***** about your perception of a possible "limitation" to a game that isn't even out yet. Judging a game long before it's released purely based on the hardware it'll be available on is just absurd.
Well, I would say how exactly does the Wii U hold gaming back more than mid-to-low powered PCs do? That's why PC games have to be scaled to hit as many different users as possible. If it's too difficult to run on the majority of PCs then the game is severely limiting its audience. Economically it's just stupid to go broke on power because if a game is limiting itself to tech geeks then its chances of doing well aren't exactly high. Furthermore, why exactly has this power argument cropped up in gaming anyway? Nobody whined about it when the PS1 or PS2 were kicking ass nor did they do so when the DS was slaughtering everything in its path. It's all quite perplexing.
 

kanetsb

New member
Sep 13, 2007
77
0
0
ThePuzzldPirate said:
kanetsb said:
That's nice... but...

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/131517-Rumor-Nintendo-Fusion-Is-Nintendos-New-Next-Gen-System

Personally, I would get the shovel and start looking for that spot where Atari buried those ETs, there will be a lot of WiiUs to keep them company soon.
You seriously taking that rumor completely straight faced? It doesn't even take a PC expert to look at those and call it out as bull shit. No one would build hardware that orthodox. I'm still under the impression that Shokio made those up(remember, anonymous source) to see how many so called gaming "Journalist" would post them as news.

XD
Why would they buy the domain too at the same time?

http://www.nintendonews.com/2014/01/nintendo-fusion-could-be-nintendos-next-gen-hardware-name/

They know the WiiU is going down - no amount of Marios and Zeldas are going to save this piece of crap. The 3DS is cool and all, but just as Sony say - the mobile phones are slowly eating away their market. They need something new, hip etc. or they will eventually (in many years though) run out of money and join Atari and Sega. You can only milk the nostalgia cow so long, before it dies...
 

Kittyhawk

New member
Aug 2, 2012
248
0
0
If this is true, it wouldn't surprise after what happened with Rayman's delayed launch. Wii U Watchdogs would have to sell next to other versions, because it wouldn't be sold strong enough on its own for Wii U.

Ubisoft could be once again left with a lot of unsold prints of the game. They might be a little sick of that happening to their games.
 

UltraPic

New member
Dec 5, 2011
142
0
0
Ultratwinkie said:
Isn't it an indicator that stuff like Call of Duty have become childish? Nintendo was always safe and colorful, traditionally stereotypically childish, and if that dies then so does the idea of what is for a kid and whats for an adult. If the little M rating on the box means nothing, then everything is suddenly childish
Well you only have to look at the comic industry to see how consumers see the product, but it also means kids will not play games anymore because they have been hijacked by old men.
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
Brian Tams said:
Strazdas said:
Soooo Watchdogs will be on WiiU. which means it can run on WiiU hardware. which means its not going to be even half of what is advertised. which means the only game i was waiting for can be scrached off the list.
Sigh.
1.) Watch_Dogs is also being released on the PS3 and Xbox 360. If anything is going to keep it from being "even half of what is advertised", it would be that reason.

2.) You seem to be under the impression that the Wii U has weaker hardware that the 360 and PS3. That is absolutely false. Multiple Devs have said that the Wii U easily surpasses the PS3 and 360. Its the Xbone and PS4 that its going to have trouble keeping up with.

3.) Bitching about a game being released on a console you don't like is childish.
You are correct, the limiting factor may very well be PS3 or Xbox360, and i may have underestimated WiiU then. The hardware speed of those consoles are.... different. Both of them have powerful processors for their time (and PS3 theoretically has faster CPU than modern i7, but noone has ever tapped its full potential because cell structure is hell) everythign else in there is abysmal. WiiU surpasses the two because it is much easier to develop for it, Nintendo has learnt that lesson with Wii and it looks like the other two also learn it and went to standart PC infrastructure.

Im sorry that i believed what developers told me its going to be like before figuring out its going to run on hardware that are incapable of such action, i guess i am childish.

CriticKitten said:
In that case, since the game is also out for the 360 and PS3, you should be bitching about that instead of bitching about how it's on the Wii U, since the Wii U is in fact more powerful than both of those consoles (and thus, is NOT the weakest link in Watch_Dogs' roster).
This is fair, i was unaware it was coming out for eggsbox 360.

A properly designed piece of motion control hardware would have made this game work fine.
That is where we will have to disagree. Motion control does not fit this style of gaming and even 100% precise motino controls would not make games of this type work well.

Most of the people who enjoy the game don't enjoy it for its graphics. 90%+ of the reviews praise either its strong story, well designed controls, or some other aspect of the game that isn't just focusing on the graphics. The game is certainly pretty but the hardware had shit little to do with creating what people enjoy about Far Cry 3. All the hardware did was make it prettier.
Never once in that paragraph you quote i mentioned graphics, and yet you somehow decided that i thought that more processing power means only more graphical capabilities. in fact i gave multiple examples where more power was necessary without changing the graphics at all that you completely ignored.

So, yes, I reject your ridiculous claim that Watch_Dogs being on the Wii U is somehow creating a "limitation" to the game. Especially since the only core argument you can make (that it means less resources are available on the hardware front) has more to do with the fact that the game is also a 360/PS3 title than the fact that it's on the Wii U. You literally cannot make this argument without explaining why you're okay with the game being on the PS3 and 360. And even if you manage to make that case without being a hypocrite (which I doubt), it's still ridiculous to ***** about your perception of a possible "limitation" to a game that isn't even out yet. Judging a game long before it's released purely based on the hardware it'll be available on is just absurd.
I never said i was okay with it being on the Ps3 and 360, they are as much a limitation as WiiU.

Dexterity said:
It's surviving fine, it's not doing as bad as the Escapist reporters want to make it sound.
Having less sales in a year than new consoles doing in a month and bringing a loss to Nintendo is not surviving fine.

tstorm823 said:
So what you're saying is that Call of Duty games on PS3 and Xbox are the same as on the wii? Sure.
No, the differences are few and hardly major features [http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/Differences_of_Call_of_Duty_games_on_the_Wii]. Mostly content being cut out. Most of them graphical differences and not any feature features that game could need processing time for.
 

thewatergamer

New member
Aug 4, 2012
647
0
0
Wheee... More games that aren't going to be on my fav system of the 3...

I really wish nintendo would work on more 3rd party support but that said, I don't think that publishers are exactly being kind to nintendo right now,

Looking from a gameplay standpoint I honestly think that the Wii-U could be the best version out of the 3 consoles, simply because the gamepad touch screen could really do a lot for inventory and other things in the game, but of course its scrapped because publishers are too afraid of anything that won't make them millions...

Not that I really care that much about watch dogs because apparently its going to be turned into a massive sequel factory...
 

Lightknight

Mugwamp Supreme
Nov 26, 2008
4,860
0
0
RE: the update.

That's what I thought. This close to launch it would be nuts to not go ahead and release on the WiiU. Stopping development on a game currently in development makes sense, but not an already nigh finished title.
 

Lightknight

Mugwamp Supreme
Nov 26, 2008
4,860
0
0
CriticKitten said:
Lightknight said:
RE: the update.

That's what I thought. This close to launch it would be nuts to not go ahead and release on the WiiU. Stopping development on a game currently in development makes sense, but not an already nigh finished title.
Good to see they updated it, but I'm not entirely pleased with the amount of time it took. We knew this was a false rumor within 24 hours. Most other gaming sites beat them to this. Even Kotaku (the metaphysical incarnation of Slowpoke) was more on the ball regarding this rumor.

Love you guys here at Escapist, but what's the deal? Why did it take three full days to update this when you had people posting about its inaccuracies on day one? I know you guys can do better. :/
Did it take them that long? I don't see an update tag time. I only posted today because I generally only post here on weekdays when work is slow.