*UPDATED*'Artificial life' breakthrough announced by scientists *VIDEO*

Recommended Videos

PurpleSky

New member
Apr 20, 2010
2,055
0
0
SimuLord said:
I'm not usually one for objecting on religious grounds, but man should not interfere in the affairs of gods like this. Unintended consequences...it's not just a good idea, it's the LAW.
I was agreeing with your post,until I read the last part and then I could only think of this
 

PurpleSky

New member
Apr 20, 2010
2,055
0
0
Mandal0re said:
Saw this on the news earlier,very exciting,lots of potential.

oh ye also, in before Christian back lash....
None so far,maybe they're too busy right now.
 

PurpleSky

New member
Apr 20, 2010
2,055
0
0
OctalLord said:
Made a account to specificly post this thought:

What will this mean commercially? Meaning people wanting to create the perfect woman/man(Refrence to Stepford Wives) Or possibly even Furries, Lizard-Men, Or even beings that aren't bipedal.

I could easily see humanity ruining this discovery with it's perversion.


Another thought to go along with that is: What about organicly grown workers and what will it mean for the job market? I mean machines already started replacing jobs in this area. But most of them are to large to move around, occasionally have glitches and errors. What if they could be replaced by a being that requires no pay, accepts poor treatment. With it's only existence to do it's specific task. (Incidentally that sounds like the opening script of a movie... Hmmm.)
If you're right about the first part I hope to see it.Imagine the custom-made prostitution!
 

PurpleSky

New member
Apr 20, 2010
2,055
0
0
Ekonos said:
-snip
I apologize for... Rambling... >_>
About the longer memories thing,you're right,if humans will live forever that will mean alot of data will be lost in their brains,so,maybe we will modify our brains so that they get bigger(more storage)
 

Erja_Perttu

New member
May 6, 2009
1,847
0
0
Ham_authority95 said:
Erja_Perttu said:
I wonder if the scientists responsible for this all gathered around, played a thunder sound and shouted 'It's ALIVE!"

Now that would be hilarious. On a more serious note, this is the beginning of the end. I'm now investing in a bunker, many tinned goods and shotguns.
Shotguns and bunkers won't stop immortal synthetic lifeforms that have the power of the internet and the ability to adapt before you could blink.
Haven't you heard? You don't blink. Don't even blink. Blink and you're dead. They are fast, faster than you could believe. Don't turn your back, don't look away, and don't blink!
 

PurpleSky

New member
Apr 20, 2010
2,055
0
0
Undead Warfare said:
I don't see how this would make zombies what-so-ever....synthetic life people, not a being that has lost all rational thinking, and attacks humans on sight. Even though it would be frighteningly cool if it did happen ( a zombie outbreak would be a lot less fun then you think), its highly unlikely that it would.

I fucking love science!
No,it's not that we will create zombies physicaly,it's like it says :
"These could be used in the future to make the most powerful bioweapons imaginable"

We'd just be able to create a virus than turns people into mindless killing machines.
 

Swarley

New member
Apr 5, 2010
615
0
0
Synthetic cells?

Next they'll make synthetic organs!

And then we can sell synthetic organs, and reposes them from people who don't pay!

It's like Repo! is happening, minus the terrible organ failure epidemic!

ps: The good repo.
 

kidigus

New member
Nov 17, 2009
534
0
0
Well this is just fucking great, we're gonna end up like the M.E. Quarians, only our girls have smaller hips.

:,(
 

Danzaivar

New member
Jul 13, 2004
1,967
0
0
I look forward to when we start making custom life, rather than just copying what already exists. Something with more than one cell would be nice, limbed life is where it gets exciting.

Til then it's pretty much just spiting god, which I'm all for, but not really practical.
 

PurpleSky

New member
Apr 20, 2010
2,055
0
0
soilent said:
PurpleSky said:
magicmonkeybars said:
Harrowdown said:
magicmonkeybars said:
Well one step closer to being replaced by something better.
I don't really see what the big fuss is about the onlt difference between this cell and a "normal" one is that a computer build it's dna rather then "nature".
Just another case of science wasting money on useless shit no one needs or cares about.
Yay for playing god I guess.
Yeah, because artificially building living organisms is so fucking easy. You do realise that this technology could lead to some serious scientific advancements, like the eradication of genetic defects, the artificial development of biofuel, the creation of vaccines and the disposal of carbon dioxide? There's likely a ton of other stuff possible too. Stop and think for a second, and you'll realise that all that "wasted money" you ***** about has improved your life rediculously.
To what end ?
What point is there to moving forward when you don't know what you're moving towards ?
Perverting the natural order of the world for no reason other then to perpetuate this meaningless endevour, hoping that in the end we'll have some justification for our actions ?
Blindly stumbling along without any foresight doesn't help anyone.
Who knows,maybe some other race created us in a similar way and launched us into space.
"Dave WHAT THE FUCK MAN?! They're killing eachother and that one is pretending to be omnicient!"

"Aw shit, jettison it, dammit, i thought this one would be different!"
Is that from a movie?Or did you think of it?
 

soilent

New member
Jan 2, 2010
790
0
0
PurpleSky said:
soilent said:
PurpleSky said:
magicmonkeybars said:
Harrowdown said:
magicmonkeybars said:
Well one step closer to being replaced by something better.
I don't really see what the big fuss is about the onlt difference between this cell and a "normal" one is that a computer build it's dna rather then "nature".
Just another case of science wasting money on useless shit no one needs or cares about.
Yay for playing god I guess.
Yeah, because artificially building living organisms is so fucking easy. You do realise that this technology could lead to some serious scientific advancements, like the eradication of genetic defects, the artificial development of biofuel, the creation of vaccines and the disposal of carbon dioxide? There's likely a ton of other stuff possible too. Stop and think for a second, and you'll realise that all that "wasted money" you ***** about has improved your life rediculously.
To what end ?
What point is there to moving forward when you don't know what you're moving towards ?
Perverting the natural order of the world for no reason other then to perpetuate this meaningless endevour, hoping that in the end we'll have some justification for our actions ?
Blindly stumbling along without any foresight doesn't help anyone.
Who knows,maybe some other race created us in a similar way and launched us into space.
"Dave WHAT THE FUCK MAN?! They're killing eachother and that one is pretending to be omnicient!"

"Aw shit, jettison it, dammit, i thought this one would be different!"
Is that from a movie?Or did you think of it?
made it up
 

Korolev

No Time Like the Present
Jul 4, 2008
1,853
0
0
Ehh - it's not REALLY new life. It's synthetic life. Make no mistake, what Dr. Venter has done is a considerable achievement. He has chemically synthesized an entire genome (albeit a very small genome).

He has re-created life, but apart from conferring antibiotic resistance to this organism (which is not difficult to do, anyone with half a brain and the appropriate plasmid and a warm water bath can do that) he hasn't actually created anything - he has synthesized an already existing organism.

However, it is still an extremely impressive goal. He has proven that technology allows us to chemically create very large chromosomes and package them correctly. Then again, bacterial/fungal genomes are not as complicated as human genomes, what with the chromatin and the DNA packing using the histones and what not. So synthesizing complex eukaryotes is still waaaaay off into the future. But he's proven that he can synthesize bacteria and almost certainly viruses. In combination with one of Venter's other projects, which is to figure out the absolute minimum genome necessary for basic life, Venter's technology will one day enable us to completely optimize a GMO. Instead of having to compromise on a GMO (i.e make it breakdown chemical A but as a result, it grows slower), we will be able to make bacteria do pretty much anything we want, without having to care about all those other genes, since it will only have the genes we want in it.

Don't worry about the end of the world or any of that malarky. At worst, this will probably result in some patent wrangling over genes and genomes. Any potential threat from this tech is decades away at best.

But I do have to say, this means that we are in the future! NASA and the US Air Force recently launched a robotic mini-space-shuttle, we've got people with artificial limbs that can move by using thought, we're developing bionic eyes (albeit pretty low resolution bionic eyes) and now we can chemically synthesize entire genomes! WE'RE IN THE FUTURE PEOPLE! WOOOOOOOO!
 

Radelaide

New member
May 15, 2008
2,503
0
0
This can only mean good things. If they can make it replicate healthy tissue, it'll be the wonder of the medical industry.
 

Cowabungaa

New member
Feb 10, 2008
10,806
0
0
Interesting. As with many developments, I'll keep an eye on this one. Many possibilities, including abuse.
SimuLord said:
I'm not usually one for objecting on religious grounds, but man should not interfere in the affairs of gods like this. Unintended consequences...it's not just a good idea, it's the LAW.
If this would be an affair of the gods. Ignoring personal believes, there's nothing that points that way.