They get a defensive and morale bonus on walls, can run nearly forever before getting tired and are extremely cheap. Use them to keep towers occupied when being sieged. Spending $200 on them the turn before you get attacked WILL make a difference if you can keep 4 extra towers online.ottenni said:Not really a weapon but peasants in the total war games. They will likely run away before even killing anything. They aren't even useful in the campaign because of mercenaries.
Really? Maybe it's my character then, because I use a submachine gun and it always works great on raiders and supermutants. I do have 100 in small guns though.Spiner909 said:The 10mm submachine gun in Fallout 3 was pretty horrible.
I am among that minority purely because I prefer bolt action rifles and I feel as though the intervention's scope comes up faster and I have noticed( probably crazy) that the intervention gets more I shot kills than the barret.Batfred said:Game designers think that they add balance. That is only if people actually use them though!
My vote goes to the Intervetion on MW2. Why would you use that when the Barret is unlocked from the get go too and is a better weapon all round? yes, yes, I know that some pople prefer the Intervention, but you have to admit, you are in a minority.
Yeah in Halo CE the pistol raped.Banhaze said:Looks like someone hasn't played Halo: Combat Evolved...R1CK_D0M said:some weapons in halo like the pistol. The prod in worms (unless if used for humiliation). Grenades and other lobbed weapons in that game are pretty useless too (excepting the holy hand grenade).
Pistol, meet everyone. Everyo- Oh you're all already dead...
Firstly, the Intervention is better in my opinion for that very reason. Everyone who addictivly uses a Barret looks like a noob. A good Intervention sniper is not only better, but requires more skill.Batfred said:Wait a second, that sounded like a dig.imahobbit4062 said:Actually, it's most kids who think the Barret is the best, more mature people like the Intervention much much moreBatfred said:Game designers think that they add balance. That is only if people actually use them though!
My vote goes to the Intervetion on MW2. Why would you use that when the Barret is unlocked from the get go too and is a better weapon all round? yes, yes, I know that some pople prefer the Intervention, but you have to admit, you are in a minority.
The intervention sucks on anyone that isn't standing still, doesn't always one shot kill even in the head and has a terrible fire rate. How is it better?
Are you joking? Insta-shield-destruction owns.Eatbrainz said:Plasma Pistol from Halo 1,2 and 3
I won a 1vs7 battle in Halo: Combat Evolved using only the pistol, that should say something.R1CK_D0M said:some weapons in halo like the pistol. The prod in worms (unless if used for humiliation). Grenades and other lobbed weapons in that game are pretty useless too (excepting the holy hand grenade).
Discrodia said:dunno what you've been playing but the interventio always one shot kills for me, imo it just takes more skill to kill someone with 1 shot from a bolt action then 5 or 6 from a semi because you missed the first shot.Batfred said:Wait a second, that sounded like a dig.imahobbit4062 said:Actually, it's most kids who think the Barret is the best, more mature people like the Intervention much much moreBatfred said:Game designers think that they add balance. That is only if people actually use them though!
My vote goes to the Intervetion on MW2. Why would you use that when the Barret is unlocked from the get go too and is a better weapon all round? yes, yes, I know that some pople prefer the Intervention, but you have to admit, you are in a minority.
The intervention sucks on anyone that isn't standing still, doesn't always one shot kill even in the head and has a terrible fire rate. How is it better?
most useless weapon i can think of, the magnum in halo's 2 and 3 in 1 it was awesome, scope and high damage, great fun![]()