Vivaldi said:
Jumplion said:
Disregarding the callings of whether you're a troll or not, I'll assume that what you're saying is true to your word.
Firstly, even if you do absolutely adore Uwe Boll's films, calling him a "high caliber director and brilliant man" and his films "The scripts for these films were brilliant, the art direction and cinematography was golden, and the overall directing, by the man himself, was somthing that greats like Speilberg and Lucas can take some lessons from." is a bit crazy, even if you do absolutely love Boll's films.
If you knew that everyone hates Boll, then surely you should have known that saying that his films are "golden and absolutely brilliant" would make you be labeled as a troll?
So, just because my opinion is unpopular, I should stay quiet? Just because I seem to diverge from the status quo, I am a troll? Are my opinions invalid because they are different?
Shouldnt I be able to post my opinions, and be able to have a resonable convorsation about them? I thought I could, but I guess that I expected the wrong things...
That's not what he's saying. He's saying that you should have expected this reaction. And after your little escapade on IRC while I tried to explain why I didn't like him but didn't hate him, you just assumed I hated him and refused to hear any different.
That makes your opinion invalid. The fact that you refuse any other possible opinion as valid means that I can't take you seriously. The fact that you hold a bias that has been pointed out to you, that you are consciously aware of, and that you could very easily suspend at least momentarily, but refuse to, means that you are considering your opinion to be fact. You are complaining that you think people are saying you aren't allowed to post your opinion, and yet when we voice our dissenting opinion you get angry and refuse to listen. That is why your opinion no longer holds any value.
EDIT: I just realized what you remind me of. Fox News. I'm serious.