im not defending valve's lack of attention, im critizng this guy's course of actionHyenatempest said:Just so you know kangaroo, the "steam subscriber agreement" isn't the word of god. common mistake. You keep saying he should "exhaust other options" but exactly how much responsibility is he supposed to take on his shoulder? How far is he supposed to go? Where does valve actually start being responsible instead of him? When it's too late and good chunk of the users have key loggers on their pc's and everybody's account info is compromised? That's all before getting into what a time sensitive issue that is. if there is a vulnerability that can be exploited that needs IMMEDIATE attention, anybody remember the ubisoft sql injection or target being compromised?
I keep hearing that he violated some agreement of some sort but I ask if he actually did. From what I am hearing he basically posted a link to a video in an update. So he didn't "hack" anything from the sounds of it, he only pointed out that somebody could have used the exploit to run malicious code, malicious code that apparently bypasses UAC.
This is all not to mention that they were well aware of the issue and had been for several months. At some point valve needs to take responsibility to protect their customers, and it was long before this ever happened. If unquestionably following a strict set of rules is the closes thing you have to a moral compass, then I highly recommend joining your local church.
from what i understand the guy posted the update, many users were harlem shaken, it was harmless but it happened
also oh religion shaming, so edgy