Vampires... Your definition?

Recommended Videos

voetballeeuw

New member
May 3, 2010
1,359
0
0
I really liked the vampires from Let the Right One In. Especially with the whole second "brain" forming in the heart.
 

Mordwyl

New member
Feb 5, 2009
1,302
0
0
The essence of a creature may change but the characteristics shouldn't.

For example, zombies have been depicted in dozens upon dozens of ways, most notably the magical and the scientific. They're still rotting reanimated corpses. Vampires are immortal nocturnal monsters which prey upon blood for sustenance and are weakened and slain by holy objects, sunlight, smelly vegetables and pointy sticks.

Of course there are times a definition can be used without the creature not fitting the description. Elves can be workaholic pygmies or feral tall people adept at ranged weaponry to even the original form of what the locals now call orcs. Likewise a troll can be a gargantuan humanoid which regenerates injuries quickly, sometimes with an affinity for dark mystical rituals and voodoo, living under bridges to stalk goats or even people on the internet.
 

Raykuza

New member
Jul 1, 2009
255
0
0
Dear everybody,

Neither Dracula nor any other vampire from Stoker's novel catches fire, explodes, disintegrates, or is even harmed in any way by the sunlight.

Thank you.

Love,
me
 

AVATAR_RAGE

New member
May 28, 2009
1,120
0
0
raikounen said:
One thing that's been bothering me lately is a small argument I've had with myself. What is the vampire? The reason I've been arguing is that there has recently been a lot of medias about vampires and all are depicted differently. So I wondered if the audience of "The Escapist" could help me find the general opinion of vampires.

The rules are simple:
1. Name your definition of a vampire and the reason for your choice
2. Don't post negative replies about a fellow members choice, it is thier opinion and not yours

In my opinion the most "vampire" vampire [http://www.google.no/images?q=Alucard&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:nb-NO:eek:fficial&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=univ&ei=X2CnTLvFJIjqOaCq6aAM&sa=X&oi=image_result_group&ct=title&resnum=1&ved=0CDAQsAQwAA&biw=1280&bih=620] is Alucard from the manga Hellsing [http://www.google.no/imgres?imgurl=http://www.starstore.com/acatalog/Hellsing-1.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.starstore.com/acatalog/Starstore_Catalogue_DARK_HORSE_COMICS_GRAPHIC_NOVELS_1909.html&usg=__E2Y4ylDT4cPoSZALRpEy8kDY7LQ=&h=545&w=400&sz=85&hl=no&start=0&sig2=qrvPRWW1U-0lIAEySqUwgA&zoom=1&tbnid=jgL3XJ20WoS_bM:&tbnh=161&tbnw=116&ei=oGGnTIW4B8SOjAfzovnlDA&prev=/images%3Fq%3DHellsing%2Bbook%2B1%26um%3D1%26hl%3Dno%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:nb-NO:eek:fficial%26biw%3D1280%26bih%3D620%26tbs%3Disch:1&um=1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=718&vpy=57&dur=2276&hovh=262&hovw=192&tx=121&ty=159&oei=oGGnTIW4B8SOjAfzovnlDA&esq=1&page=1&ndsp=19&ved=1t:429,r:4,s:0]
My reason is that:
1. He has the right amount of pride and insanity to pull of incredible dialouge and personality.
2. When he drinks the blood of a human and kills it he can summon them forth as his minions, as blood is the currency of life.
3. He is a commander of blood, and if there is blood outside of a human in the vicinity he does not need to it, but rather it flows to him at his command.
4. He is immortal and can regenerate from any wound. No use with sunlight, a cross, stake or guns. He can regenerate even if his body totaly whiped out.

I agree the Hellsing vampires are the most accurate representations of a vampire of modern times.

But then again it is heavily based upon Stoker's work
 

willsham45

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,130
0
0
Drink human Blood, If victim killed then are dead if not will become vampire them selfes and will be slaves to the one who converted them
They cannot enter a house unless they are invited in first
They cannot survive in sunlight
Can only be killed if spiked in the heart
Cannot stand garlic
Cross will burn skin
 

Legendary Alucard

New member
Sep 15, 2010
126
0
0
Look at my name.. Do i need to say More

Im a big Fan of the DayWalker.. I think a Vampire needs Class like Dracula and not Like in Twighlight.. Some Whimp with fangs -.-
 
Sep 9, 2010
1,597
0
0
FargoDog said:
A vampire should drink blood to survive, burn in sunlight and be unable to enter the houses of others without permission. Why do so many pieces of vampire fiction forget about that last piece of lore?
You forgot crossing running water
 

mr_rubino

New member
Sep 19, 2010
721
0
0
Twilight_guy said:
The vampire is a mythological creature and thus defined primarily by what what favor of cultures of social background you are looking out. Vampires from different places and people are different and diverse I'm not going to step in and say any one is better then another, that's not my place. My vampire is actually a collection of elements from many stories and not singlely defined. Of course my vampire doesn't sparkle in the sun, he burns.
Indeed. In China, vampires go hippity-hoppity-hippity-hoppity all the live long day. It's cuz of rigor mortis. =(
Also: My vampire just can't turn into stuff in the sun. Or walk down walls.
 

Varanfan9

New member
Mar 12, 2010
788
0
0
Creatures that drink blood, have an adverse reaction to sunlight, and have super human abilities.
For me the best interpretation of vampires are the Castlevania ones. Able to use magic and control other creatures of the night.
 

Mikeyfell

Elite Member
Aug 24, 2010
2,784
0
41
the Noble Dead vampires *except for a couple things
1) they burn in sunlight
2) they drink blood to survive *but they don't need to kill the donor
3) they have to completely drain their pray to turn them into a vampire
4) the turned vampires have to obey their masters' commands but other than that have free will
5) Decapitation will kill them *as will a stake to the heart
6) they can't change into a bat
7) they don't have magic powers. If they can seduce or influence you it's because they spent years practicing.
8) they need permission to enter a house.
9) they burn if they touch garlic or crosses
10) *their bodies are dead and they don't decay as long as they drink blood regularly
11) their personalities remain unchanged, they stay the same person except for the previous 10 things

EDIT: 12) oh and I guess they don't cast reflections any more but I never really cared about that.
 

icame

New member
Aug 4, 2010
2,649
0
0
Gentlemen, drink blood to survive, die in sunlight,the garlic/crosses/whatever is optional, Turning into a bat also optional as long as they don't sparkle.
 

Not-here-anymore

In brightest day...
Nov 18, 2009
3,028
0
0
FargoDog said:
A vampire should drink blood to survive, burn in sunlight and be unable to enter the houses of others without permission. Why do so many pieces of vampire fiction forget about that last piece of lore?
This. Also, dogs and cats hate them (though wolves seem to quite like them), and they seem to have a bizarre power of hypnosis/mind control over their victims, who enter a pre-vampire state until either killed or turned by the original vampire. Also, shape-shifting, or various tricks to present that illusion, is a power many exhibit. Oh, and stronger and faster than people.
See: Any vampire post-Dracula

Alternatively, they're closer to being the 'fast zombies' of 28 days later etc..., except actually undead.
Near-mindless creatures, filled with a burning hatred for all things living, with superhuman strength and speed (debatable), that require the blood of the living to survive.
See: Eastern European folk tales, the revenants in Anne Rice's vampire stuff.
 

Palademon

New member
Mar 20, 2010
4,167
0
0
Need blood, immortal, unaging, killed/hurt by sunlight.
Killed by stakes to the heart. Repelled by holy objects.

Why? Because it's cool. And I want to be one.
Why would I want to be hurt by sunlight? I don't, but I'm ginger anyway :p
 

irani_che

New member
Jan 28, 2010
630
0
0
read dracula by brahm stoker..
that is my definition of a vampire before all else. its actually close to urs.

after that, maybe vampire the masquerade?
 

TundraStalax

New member
Jun 8, 2010
106
0
0
a hierarchy, really only in terms of what happens to the resultant victims, high-vampires make victims low-vampires, low-vampires make zombie ghoul things

and dracula is the highest of the high, obviously

aside from that though, I believ in the traditional weaknesses and strengths of vampires ala, Bram Stoker mainly.