The_root_of_all_evil said:
Girlysprite said:
...I find it VERY annoying when people start to comment on a womans looks, if they'd hit it, or her sexual life when she writes something we they don't agree with. As such, you're sending the message that women are inferior anyways...which may not be what you mean, but it's what you more or less say.
But then she wins either way, doesn't she?
If we react, it's because it hit a nerve.
If we don't react, it must be true.
I read the above several times and I honestly don't the the logic of what you are saying here. I'm not saying you are being illogical, I just really don't understand what you mean by this.
The_root_of_all_evil said:
She was the one who deliberately brought up the idea of wanting a man to give her children.
Which is not the same as her saying she can't find a guy to "hit it." Finding someone to sleep with is probably something she can do, it's finding someone who will step up and raise children with her that she is apparently having problems with. She seems to think she is somehow entitled to a husband, which makes me want to lock her in a room with the next whiny fanboy who thinks he's entitled to a girlfriend.
The_root_of_all_evil said:
I'm reminded of IDT/INDT from the classroom blackboards, or is that something equally un-PC?
I googled IDT/INDT and couldn't find an actual definition, and I've never heard of it before, so I can't tell you if it's PC or not. Probably not, is my guess.
The_root_of_all_evil said:
And let's face it, with most men we argue with, we agree whether we'd hit it or not.
What? Wait! What?! Let me just double-check what you said there - with most men you argue with, you agree whether you'd hit it or not - so when when Kevin McCullough posted that bullshit about Mass Effect, you discussed his fuckability just like you did with the woman who wrote the article? Or are you saying that any two guys talking about a woman must at some point in the conversation determine whether or not they'd have sex with her? Because if you mean the first, dude, I'm totally bummed that I missed that part of the conversation, and if you mean the second, then wow, I'm not sure whether that is more insulting to women or to men.
The_root_of_all_evil said:
It's just that as part of the alleged RULERS OF THE WORLD, life pretty much sucks for us too. You don't need to be in a minority to be buried in shit.
I would agree with that. Which is why I think feminism is not just for women. The way the gender divide works now, it kecks things up for everyone. Ultimately, feminism is (or should be, in my opinion) about making sure that everyone has the full range of options for pursuing happiness, which is why the sooner this sexist "Well, I disagree with her,
but more importantly I wouldn't fuck her" mode of argument dies out, the sooner things start getting better for everyone.