Warhammer 40k vs starwars... is there any possible way for SW to win?

Recommended Videos

Gitsnik

New member
May 13, 2008
798
0
0
addiction21 said:
Well maybe for future reference some silly little rules could be laid down. Like in SW's case do you jsut use the movies or everything? Warhammer is it just the tabletop game or everything else?
But we would need to include BattleFleet Gothic in there as well - Star Wars covers enough land and space attacks to be useful, 40k only covers ground assault - Drop Pods, Teleportation, Grav-Chutes etc.

So, combination of Gothic and 40k is necessary - which leads to further questions - do we include canon based on most recent editions? Or can we use the old Space Hulk as well (where a squad of terminators take out an entire space hulk of gaunts.

Also, can someone just get a sister of battle to fly over a Waagh and use the loud hailers to scream "Darth Vader thinks you're all marine boy pussies!".

There's another question, is it 40k universe (Tyranids, Orks, SM, C:SM, Eldar, Tau, Necron, SQUATS! etc) vs the Star Wars universe (i.e. Rebels AND Empire) or is it just Empire vs Imperium.

You know what, I think there is enough ambiguity in the definition and the differences between the two universes as to make the entire discussion moot - psykers are fairly evenly matched, tech is fairly evenly matched, size of empires are fairly easily matched - choosing a side is about as useful as flipping a coin.
 

Wyatt

New member
Feb 14, 2008
384
0
0
Therumancer said:
*snip*

Honor Harrington (David Weber Novels) gets even worse because it's not only using those kinds of engagement distances but a space travel technology/logic that simply makes a ship invulnerable from most directions, and the directions it's vulnerable from require an obscene energy output or a missle basically carrying it's own "impeller wedge" to penetrate. Most engagements involving fleets firing hundreds of thousands of missles that have their own "star drives" at each other. Again a diametrically opposed concept, and arguably taking place in a smaller universe than Star Trek, but one where if you use everything as it was written these guys would probably dust anything they came up against.

Getting hit by the broadside yield of say 40 "Honorverse" Superdreadnaughts is going to dust most space fleets from other science fiction from millions of miles away with little they can do about it.

... and of course I have no doubt that in the cosm of science fiction when it comes to competing logic, there are things that can trump that. :)

The point is that as amusing as these conversations can be, there is never going to be any real resolution, and if your favorite science fiction universe takes a pounding in a debate about another one, never fear there is something out there that will trump that one too.


>>>----Therumancer--->
damn we think alot alike. i agree with everything your saying.

i think that in most of this debate alot of basic things are getting left out in the chase to say 'my team is uba, yurz is teh suxorz'.

if i had to pick ONE sci-fie universe to dominate them all id pick ........ the Dahak series (also by david weber)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Armageddon_Inheritance

basicaly the earth moon is a war ship. but unlike the death star its AI is self aware and truly 'alive'. the weapons are a combination of 'energy guns' and hyper torpedos with warheads from chemical, nuclear, anti-mater, and gravitonic (think small black holes generated on command).

powerful enough in its own right, but it gets better (or worsed depending) this is ONE 'picket ship' of the 4th imperiums battle fleet. turns out that the imperium before it fell, due to i might add creating a bio weapons that was capable of killing any living thing (plant, animal, anything, so much for the tyranids) it came in contact with and persisting on being deadly for EONS after words. this weapons was spread throughout the 4th imperium by instiant teleportation it had access too between ALL its planets. anyhow before this imperium fell it had created entire FLEETS of these moon sized ships. the entire home system of the 4th imperum was shielded out to 4 light minuts from the central star (your getting into dyson sphere sized objects now) and with shields capable of standing off whole fleets of Dahak sized ships

in the books i referance a group of something like only 20 of these battle moons (and the 4th imperium before its fall had built millions of them) takes out an entire fleet of 4 million PLUS, 20 mile long enemy battle ships. it was crazy mad combat, the first half consisted of Dahak simply going supra-light inside a solar system and causeing a sun to Nova wiping out the mear 250,000 or so 'scout ships' of the enemy fleet in the process and it only got worse from there.

hell in the 'small' battles at the beging of the book the enemy moves a moon from saturn i think it was and tryed to use it as a bullet to hit earth only to have dahak show up and blow the whole funcking MOON to hell with a hand full of gravitonic warheads.

heh yeah warhammer 40K is 'over the top' but ive yet too see anything that could stand up to the 4th Imperiums weapons. you dont GET any more powerful than using black holes as weapons.....

super psyker, chaos gods, jedi, or necrons not excepted.

the bottom line fact is that dahak and a couple of backups would fucking rip shit up against the Star wars AND 40K millitarys combined, ALL of them, chaos, necrons, rebels, empire, imperium, eldar, AND necrons. the tyranids wouldnt even be a speed bump.

i may have sounded like im going rather far from the topic, but im not, there is more too this subject that im seeing from alot of posters. biggest weapons ARENT the only factor, since there is a limit on how powerful ANY weapons can be. black holes are that limit, once you can generate black holes and use them to wreck shit you wouldnt NEED anything else. and once your capable of creating this ultimate weapons it THEN becomes a question of logistics and range. can you get more of your black hole guns to a specific battle faster than the enemy? THAT is where the importiance of fleets come in. all things being equil and all sides have a 'black hole' gun than the side with the most of them and the ability to get them into the right spot at the right time wins.

theru and i agree 100% on the Star TREK points too. ive ALLWAYS felt that star trek ships would hand the empire its ass just because of the exact things he listed. and while id take some exception too the idea that the SD's of the honor harrington univer would be the ultimate wrecking maching he think, its only because they are using basicaly simple bomb pumped lasers or normal megaton nuclear warheads. i KNOW that the star trek ships have shields that can stand up too that kind of damage without even a flicker. hell in TNG they developed some kind of phase shield of some shit IIRC that allowed them to land on a sun, even in TOS the enterprise stood up to "quadra-megaton salvos" from the romulans in 'ballance of terror' so i dont think that the Honor harrington ships themselves would really stand up.

HOWEVER. take that same fleet idea, give those ships gravitonic warheads and star trek shields and then you have something that would in fact kick ass and take names. the tactics in the honor harrington novels are masterful the ONLY weakness is the limits of weapons and shields. and this iw what this all really comes down too. all weapons being more or less equil than its the tactics and logistics that make the difference.

now finaly for the love of God, all you half whits that are going on and on and on about the necrons, shut up allready, if they were this uba leet death force your obsessed with they would have ALLREADY won the war. obviously since they HAVENT they CAN be beat ........ just like anyone else.

well except george lucas himself that is. *snicker*
 

Tech Team FTW!

New member
Apr 1, 2009
1,049
0
0
Star Wars fanatic in me says: does 40K have a tactical genius to rival Grand Admiral Thrawn or a weapons plant to rival the star forge?
 

Archaeology Hat

New member
Nov 6, 2007
430
0
0
Pi_Fighter said:
Star Wars fanatic in me says: does 40K have a tactical genius to rival Grand Admiral Thrawn or a weapons plant to rival the star forge?
The God Emperor of Mankind, Lord Solar Mecharius, Horus, Lion El Johnson (the Primarchs in general really).

Any Forge-World, especially Mars.
 

Cheesebob

New member
Oct 31, 2008
1,445
0
0
Pi_Fighter said:
Star Wars fanatic in me says: does 40K have a tactical genius to rival Grand Admiral Thrawn or a weapons plant to rival the star forge?
Yes and Yes

Commisarr Creed, he somehow stopped one of the Biggest WAAAAAGH!!s which was heraled by the baddest Orks ever with 'only' several billion men and a small solar system of tanks...and thats a general being careful with his resources :D

2nd one: Mars. Thats all I have to say about that
 

Asehujiko

New member
Feb 25, 2008
2,119
0
0
addiction21 said:
Sorry but why is it people have to attack others and what they like? I've seen many topics around the forums like this and they have been started by the SW fans and Trek fans. It just seems to depend on the population of a forum.

With that said would you like to actualy add anything contructive to the arguement here?
I don't attack others for what they like but i do get annoyed when the entire purpose of a thread is for one person to keep repeating " omgomg der r so much IG dey pwn u alllololol and SM iz da shizz dey r liek mester cheif wiff optimus prime combined omgomg dey pwn sit nd jedi lolol " and wanking over a copy of their 5th ed rulebook.

99% of the 40k units would fall flat on their face if indrocuded to the concepts of logistics, laws of physics and common sense. Starwars wins. Then Azathoth eats both universes, palpatine dies, emperor dies, Cthulhu mythos wins.
 

Zeke the Freak

New member
Jan 27, 2009
191
0
0
Asehujiko said:
addiction21 said:
Sorry but why is it people have to attack others and what they like? I've seen many topics around the forums like this and they have been started by the SW fans and Trek fans. It just seems to depend on the population of a forum.

With that said would you like to actualy add anything contructive to the arguement here?
I don't attack others for what they like but i do get annoyed when the entire purpose of a thread is for one person to keep repeating " omgomg der r so much IG dey pwn u alllololol and SM iz da shizz dey r liek mester cheif wiff optimus prime combined omgomg dey pwn sit nd jedi lolol " and wanking over a copy of their 5th ed rulebook.

99% of the 40k units would fall flat on their face if indrocuded to the concepts of logistics, laws of physics and common sense. Starwars wins. Then Azathoth eats both universes, palpatine dies, emperor dies, Cthulhu mythos wins.
No one is forcing you to read this. If just gonna be an ass then just leave. If not, then your more then welcome to throw in your 2 cents about who would win.
 

Rajin Cajun

New member
Sep 12, 2008
1,157
0
0
Gitsnik said:
addiction21 said:
Asehujiko said:
Why is it always that 40k fanboys start my universe vs your universe topics and continue ranting that it's " better" then everything else even if it isn't related at all because it would win in a military conflict?
Sorry but why is it people have to attack others and what they like? I've seen many topics around the forums like this and they have been started by the SW fans and Trek fans. It just seems to depend on the population of a forum.

With that said would you like to actualy add anything contructive to the arguement here?
No, the appropriate response is "Because we have more disposable income than you" (anyone not getting the joke has never been on rpg.net!) If you want to complain about not adding something to an argument, try actually adding something to an argument.

For clarification, are we accepting all the extra books by various authors as canon? We've accepted the SunCrusher which wasn't Lucas - if so can we start to abuse some of the books by Abnett and such which do not follow (sometimes) the basis of the Rick Priestly and Co (i.e. official) canon? The same applies to the Black Library?
If that is the case I now back Warmaster Horus and the Luna Wolves/Sons of Horus/Black Legion who could alone destroy SW with their plot armor alone. Hell bring in the Iron Warriors and Death Guard and I suggest that the SW races look for a new galaxy in a month. LET THE GALAXY BURN! Muhahaha.
 

Valiance

New member
Jan 14, 2009
3,823
0
0
Zeke the Freak said:
This isnt a VS thread, I know 40k is over the top, i was just wondering if there was a loop hole that enabled the SW universe to even have a chance.
If it's a Star Wars movie, the protagonist can't die, so...that would probably help some, yeah?
 

Lunar Shadow

New member
Dec 9, 2008
653
0
0
Cheesebob said:
Pi_Fighter said:
Star Wars fanatic in me says: does 40K have a tactical genius to rival Grand Admiral Thrawn or a weapons plant to rival the star forge?
Yes and Yes

Commisarr Creed, he somehow stopped one of the Biggest WAAAAAGH!!s which was heraled by the baddest Orks ever with 'only' several billion men and a small solar system of tanks...and thats a general being careful with his resources :D

2nd one: Mars. Thats all I have to say about that
You are thinking of Commisark Yarik, Creed (as in Lord Castellean) is part of the Cadian IG.
 

42manZ

New member
Jun 7, 2008
251
0
0
Christemo said:
42manZ said:
Wouldukindly said:
CountFenring said:
I'm not sure but I don't think 40k has an equivalent of the Death Star or LightSabers. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Death stars? They regularly dust planets with doomsday devices (notice the plural).
LightSabers? Chainsaws or power gear that can chop through Terminator armour.
lightsabers can chop throw chainsaw swords. lightsabers can chop through anyhitng.

Except croitoss weave, but we all know that was a EU retcon so that the use of swords could make more sense.
if 1 of IGs lasguns cant hurt power armor, lightys cant either. Power Armor is so freaking hard, and the marine in under is unbelieveably tough, u could´nt kill him with a cruise missile. and the SM bolter is using 75-caliber bullets. real-life 50-caliber bullets can blow the head of a man if u shoot him in the jaw. 75-caliber bullets are capable of blasting the foot off a soldier if u shoot him just under the knee.
Dude, Lightsabers are pure energy, the only thing that a lightsaber can't stop is a high aount of energy, thus no matter what caliber a bullet is, a lightsaber can still ruin it.
 

DC_Josh

Harmonica God
Oct 9, 2008
444
0
0
Isn't a "Frost Blade" in 40k a lightsabre? I also remember in the Eisenhorn trillogy, for an encounter, Ol'Eisy had a power sword that simply projected its energy field out from a hilt with no blade section. Also in the Dark Hersey 40k pnprpg, there is a weapon called a Sollex Energy Blade that is described as having a roaring blade of plasma.

I remember seeing GW posting the rules for "real" space marines, rather than the balanced version in the games. For 1000 points or so you couldn't only get 3-5 marines.
 

Zeke the Freak

New member
Jan 27, 2009
191
0
0
42manZ said:
Christemo said:
42manZ said:
Wouldukindly said:
CountFenring said:
I'm not sure but I don't think 40k has an equivalent of the Death Star or LightSabers. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Death stars? They regularly dust planets with doomsday devices (notice the plural).
LightSabers? Chainsaws or power gear that can chop through Terminator armour.
lightsabers can chop throw chainsaw swords. lightsabers can chop through anyhitng.

Except croitoss weave, but we all know that was a EU retcon so that the use of swords could make more sense.
if 1 of IGs lasguns cant hurt power armor, lightys cant either. Power Armor is so freaking hard, and the marine in under is unbelieveably tough, u could´nt kill him with a cruise missile. and the SM bolter is using 75-caliber bullets. real-life 50-caliber bullets can blow the head of a man if u shoot him in the jaw. 75-caliber bullets are capable of blasting the foot off a soldier if u shoot him just under the knee.
Dude, Lightsabers are pure energy, the only thing that a lightsaber can't stop is a high aount of energy, thus no matter what caliber a bullet is, a lightsaber can still ruin it.
Jedi's have a hard time deflecting shot gun rounds, imagine how well they could deflect an on slaught of miniature, high calibur missiles. They dont stand a chance.
 

42manZ

New member
Jun 7, 2008
251
0
0
Zeke the Freak said:
42manZ said:
Christemo said:
42manZ said:
Wouldukindly said:
CountFenring said:
I'm not sure but I don't think 40k has an equivalent of the Death Star or LightSabers. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Death stars? They regularly dust planets with doomsday devices (notice the plural).
LightSabers? Chainsaws or power gear that can chop through Terminator armour.
lightsabers can chop throw chainsaw swords. lightsabers can chop through anyhitng.

Except croitoss weave, but we all know that was a EU retcon so that the use of swords could make more sense.
if 1 of IGs lasguns cant hurt power armor, lightys cant either. Power Armor is so freaking hard, and the marine in under is unbelieveably tough, u could´nt kill him with a cruise missile. and the SM bolter is using 75-caliber bullets. real-life 50-caliber bullets can blow the head of a man if u shoot him in the jaw. 75-caliber bullets are capable of blasting the foot off a soldier if u shoot him just under the knee.
Dude, Lightsabers are pure energy, the only thing that a lightsaber can't stop is a high aount of energy, thus no matter what caliber a bullet is, a lightsaber can still ruin it.
Jedi's have a hard time deflecting shot gun rounds, imagine how well they could deflect an on slaught of miniature, high calibur missiles. They dont stand a chance.
What basis are you taking the shot gun rounds from? A twirl of a lightsaber or a jump out of the way can do it (only if you're a Jedi ;) )
 

Archaeology Hat

New member
Nov 6, 2007
430
0
0
42manZ said:
What basis are you taking the shot gun rounds from? A twirl of a lightsaber or a jump out of the way can do it (only if you're a Jedi ;) )
Try lightsabering the Golan Arms shotgun thing from Jedi-Knight Jedi Outcast... of course, you're right about the jump.
 

Zeke the Freak

New member
Jan 27, 2009
191
0
0
42manZ said:
Zeke the Freak said:
42manZ said:
Christemo said:
42manZ said:
Wouldukindly said:
CountFenring said:
I'm not sure but I don't think 40k has an equivalent of the Death Star or LightSabers. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Death stars? They regularly dust planets with doomsday devices (notice the plural).
LightSabers? Chainsaws or power gear that can chop through Terminator armour.
lightsabers can chop throw chainsaw swords. lightsabers can chop through anyhitng.

Except croitoss weave, but we all know that was a EU retcon so that the use of swords could make more sense.
if 1 of IGs lasguns cant hurt power armor, lightys cant either. Power Armor is so freaking hard, and the marine in under is unbelieveably tough, u could´nt kill him with a cruise missile. and the SM bolter is using 75-caliber bullets. real-life 50-caliber bullets can blow the head of a man if u shoot him in the jaw. 75-caliber bullets are capable of blasting the foot off a soldier if u shoot him just under the knee.
Dude, Lightsabers are pure energy, the only thing that a lightsaber can't stop is a high aount of energy, thus no matter what caliber a bullet is, a lightsaber can still ruin it.
Jedi's have a hard time deflecting shot gun rounds, imagine how well they could deflect an on slaught of miniature, high calibur missiles. They dont stand a chance.
What basis are you taking the shot gun rounds from? A twirl of a lightsaber or a jump out of the way can do it (only if you're a Jedi ;) )
You cant do either against a bolter, especially a heavy bolter.
If you twirl you saber, it explodes in your face, throwing you off only to be hit by another bolt. If you jump out of the way, considering this is a rapid fire machine gun and not a semi-auto/pump shotgun, its not that hard to hit you in the air or where you jumped too.