Warp Drive Might Actually Be Possible

Recommended Videos

Seneschal

Blessed are the righteous
Jun 27, 2009
561
0
0
Agow95 said:
GenGenners said:
Hmmm.....
Isn't that similar to how FTL travel works in Mass Effect?
No, in mass effect they flow a current through element zero via dark energy, with a positive current, mass is increased, with a negative current, mass is decreased. So they lower the ships mass to nothing and this allows ftl speeds, so to do it the mass effect way we'd need a element that bioware made up and a hypothetical form of energy that may exist.
No, the actual FTL is handwaved completely, since mass-alteration couldn't accomplish it. We have massless particles in our universe already - photons and gluons - and those always travel at the speed of light. So, a spacecraft with a rest mass of zero would essentially move 300,000 km/s, no more, no less. While that would be very useful (heck, removing even half the mass would be an amazing achievement for space travel), it would only get you to the nearest star in 4.5 years.
Regarding the FTL, they just mutter something about "mass-free bubbles where the subjective speed of light is higher", which makes no sense.
 

porpoise hork

Fly Fatass!! Fly!!!
Dec 26, 2008
297
0
0
XMark said:
Just wondering - if a functional FTL drive is invented, what happens to the funny time-related consequences? Would you arrive at your destination before you left?
Well if its possible then the laws of physics would have to be re-written.

 

thebinaryone

New member
Aug 31, 2012
10
0
0
i heard that a few guys in an italian university came out with their own FTL hypothesis. not sure if it was based on white's stuff or alcubierre's designs but they were saying the amount of power needed would be E=mc^2 if m was the mass of Jupiter. that may be the "impractical" he was talking about XD

on a side note; this is very exciting news for someone who's about to start a theorhetical physics coures at university :D
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
Something similar to generating your own wormholes then. I like this.

As for the pwoer requirements. well you have to remember that there are still two huge untapped energy sources that we have. which is: helium3, which is suppsoedly 100 times more powerful than atomic plants we have now, and starts, which we dont have the technology for yet and probably wont for a while, but if we can take solar flares and use them to generate energy we could easily have enough energy to make warp drive jump 100+ times.
 

srm79

New member
Jan 31, 2010
500
0
0
tmande2nd said:
Come on hurry up!
There are some green skinned space babes that need kirking!
Yes that's a verb.
You Sir, just won the internet. Congratulations.

Captcha: eat cous cous - why, Captcha, just...why?
 

Aurora Firestorm

New member
May 1, 2008
692
0
0
H'okay, guys, don't get too excited. If you read the articles, they say this requires "exotic matter." Which probably doesn't exist, by the way. It basically means matter that isn't made up of your usual protons, neutrons, and electrons. Nothing we build now or in the foreseeable future can actually pull off this kind of FTL trick, because we just don't know what we'd ever build it out of.
 

ShadowKatt

New member
Mar 19, 2009
1,410
0
0
Acrisius said:
How do you hit the brakes in space..?
Braking in a zero gravity/zero friction environment means that you simply apply thrust opposite the direction you're going. It either means putting engines in the front of your ship to slow you down or rotating the ship to fire the engines against your current velocity.

As for the warp thing...I'm less worried about how to stop and more about how you see where you're going. If you warp the fabric of space then you also warp everything IN that fabric of space like light and other forms of radiation. Meaning you could not see(clearly) what you were flying into.
 

theultimateend

New member
Nov 1, 2007
3,621
0
0
Agow95 said:
GenGenners said:
Hmmm.....
Isn't that similar to how FTL travel works in Mass Effect?
No, in mass effect they flow a current through element zero via dark energy, with a positive current, mass is increased, with a negative current, mass is decreased. So they lower the ships mass to nothing and this allows ftl speeds, so to do it the mass effect way we'd need a element that bioware made up and a hypothetical form of energy that may exist.
Wouldn't being massless mean that they travel at the speed of light, not faster than it?

porpoise hork said:
XMark said:
Just wondering - if a functional FTL drive is invented, what happens to the funny time-related consequences? Would you arrive at your destination before you left?
Well if its possible then the laws of physics would have to be re-written.

Nothing in Quantum Theory states that warp drive can't exist. I'm not aware of anything in physics that would need to be rewritten.

You aren't moving faster than light, you are bending space. The ship itself isn't actually moving. Similar to pulling on a table cloth to move a salt shaker on it, the shaker is motionless in relation to its surroundings. It is the distance itself that is being shortened.
 

Agow95

New member
Jul 29, 2011
445
0
0
theultimateend said:
Agow95 said:
GenGenners said:
Hmmm.....
Isn't that similar to how FTL travel works in Mass Effect?
No, in mass effect they flow a current through element zero via dark energy, with a positive current, mass is increased, with a negative current, mass is decreased. So they lower the ships mass to nothing and this allows ftl speeds, so to do it the mass effect way we'd need a element that bioware made up and a hypothetical form of energy that may exist.
Wouldn't being massless mean that they travel at the speed of light, not faster than it?
According to the Codex it reduces the mass completely, creating greater acceleration, which somehow raises the speed of light within the mass effect field, which also removes Time Dilation (which is effectively travelling forwards in time by moving so fast).
 

Vegosiux

New member
May 18, 2011
4,381
0
0
theultimateend said:
You aren't moving faster than light, you are bending space. The ship itself isn't actually moving. Similar to pulling on a table cloth to move a salt shaker on it, the shaker is motionless in relation to its surroundings. It is the distance itself that is being shortened.
Indeed, it's not as much "FTL" as it is "Taking a short cut while the light goes the long way around" thing. Similar to you making 10 steps uphill while your friend in the car has to take the road up the incline and make a wide turn, you're still slower than them, but you'll be from point A to point B quicker than they are.

However, since "light" is our main means of transmitting and receieving information, that could lead to some funky stuff. Or at least it's going to look funky until we have this spacebending thing observed more extensively. And they thought bloodbending was the real deal, pfsh.
 

theultimateend

New member
Nov 1, 2007
3,621
0
0
Agow95 said:
theultimateend said:
Agow95 said:
GenGenners said:
Hmmm.....
Isn't that similar to how FTL travel works in Mass Effect?
No, in mass effect they flow a current through element zero via dark energy, with a positive current, mass is increased, with a negative current, mass is decreased. So they lower the ships mass to nothing and this allows ftl speeds, so to do it the mass effect way we'd need a element that bioware made up and a hypothetical form of energy that may exist.
Wouldn't being massless mean that they travel at the speed of light, not faster than it?
According to the Codex it reduces the mass completely, creating greater acceleration, which somehow raises the speed of light within the mass effect field, which also removes Time Dilation (which is effectively travelling forwards in time by moving so fast).
I have a feeling the codex writers never took a science class.

That was fun to read but mostly made no sense. Thanks for the insight though.

Basically the speed of light (c) IS presuming a vacuum devoid of mass [non-photon particles].

If the space it is traveling in is not completely particle free the speed of light becomes slower (mostly due to it bouncing off of particles as it travels, changing the straight line into a zig zag one).
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
Well, to be entirely honest I think Einstein will be proven wrong at some point, just like other great minds before him. To me the idea that light speed is as fast as you can go, and that to travel faster would effectively mean you'd be travelling through time has always struck me as being pretty wonky, even if it can be justified mathematically for the moment.

That said, this is an interesting development, time will tell what's going to happen with it.

I honestly expect we're likely to re-write what we know about physics more than a few times, maybe even before my lifetime is done.
 

Blaster395

New member
Dec 13, 2009
514
0
0
Silva said:
The world economy as it is is sadly built around exploiting that starving side, and that includes science as well. Such sacrifice is made for theories. One can only hope that some day, these theories can somehow help those of us starving and killing each other to stop. To me, that's as important, nay, more important, than getting to other stars.

Let's try to make this world as good a place as it can be, -before- we try to go ruin other places. That at least makes sense.
The world economy really just cares little about the poorest nations of the world. They have minimal infrastructure (for transporting products and electricity), little education (for a workforce that can do stuff other than manual labour) and no stability or safety (Kinda hard to set up any industries when they might be raided, looted and burned down with all the employees killed). The only reason to ever set up industries in these nations is because the wages are low.

The vast majority of science is done for the purpose of making this place as good as possible. The 20th century has been the least violent century so far, in terms of % of male deaths that are caused by warfare, and the 21st century looks like it will top that record. More people now die from obesity instead of starvation.

We produce enough food for 12 billion people. Why are some people starving? Is it all the people in the first world being greedy gits and eating it all? Not really. You know the infrastructure problems I mentioned earlier that exist in the poorest nations. They make it very difficult to transport and sell excess food to them. Additionally, mass-dumping food on these nations tends to destroy the economy as it puts the farmers that live there out of business.
 

Caverat

New member
Jun 11, 2010
204
0
0
I love reading articles like this. Always nice to get a good dose of optimism.

Even the comments so far are better than the typical for these types of threads. There are fewer posts by cynical folk who like to pretend they know what they're talking about with regards to science/mechanics.
 

iblis666

New member
Sep 8, 2008
1,106
0
0
ok so we now need to find a way to harness dark energy or zero point energy or reduce the energy cost to a manageable amount of antimatter
 

FieryTrainwreck

New member
Apr 16, 2010
1,968
0
0
They should probably test this stuff in space. Preferably the next solar system over.

Although it is fun to think about them perturbing space on the surface of this planet. What if it's a shockwave that shifts every particle on the planet like 1cm? Would everything be instantly disintegrated?
 

thahat

New member
Apr 23, 2008
973
0
0
Deathlyphil said:
vxicepickxv said:
Acrisius said:
How do you hit the brakes in space..?
The problem with current theoretical brakes that would be easily developed is that the brakes would kind of destroy your destination. They're still working on that part.
Brakes aren't needed at all, since the object in the warp bubble is not actually moving. What the field is doing moving space around the object. In Star Trek this is why they aren't affected by time dilation. If this works the same way, then it too should avoid the time dilation effect.
in addition, its prety safe! power goes off > movement of the bubble stops. but your still IN the bubble. so even if you would stick in say, a ROCK your air bubble would still be there so you would not get crushed! *dont ask me where the rock part would be, im guessing where you can from*