According to the article, about 10c.Neofishie said:Any mention of what speeds they think they can reach with this tech?
According to the article, about 10c.Neofishie said:Any mention of what speeds they think they can reach with this tech?
No, the actual FTL is handwaved completely, since mass-alteration couldn't accomplish it. We have massless particles in our universe already - photons and gluons - and those always travel at the speed of light. So, a spacecraft with a rest mass of zero would essentially move 300,000 km/s, no more, no less. While that would be very useful (heck, removing even half the mass would be an amazing achievement for space travel), it would only get you to the nearest star in 4.5 years.Agow95 said:No, in mass effect they flow a current through element zero via dark energy, with a positive current, mass is increased, with a negative current, mass is decreased. So they lower the ships mass to nothing and this allows ftl speeds, so to do it the mass effect way we'd need a element that bioware made up and a hypothetical form of energy that may exist.GenGenners said:Hmmm.....
Isn't that similar to how FTL travel works in Mass Effect?
Well if its possible then the laws of physics would have to be re-written.XMark said:Just wondering - if a functional FTL drive is invented, what happens to the funny time-related consequences? Would you arrive at your destination before you left?
You Sir, just won the internet. Congratulations.tmande2nd said:Come on hurry up!
There are some green skinned space babes that need kirking!
Yes that's a verb.
Braking in a zero gravity/zero friction environment means that you simply apply thrust opposite the direction you're going. It either means putting engines in the front of your ship to slow you down or rotating the ship to fire the engines against your current velocity.Acrisius said:How do you hit the brakes in space..?
Wouldn't being massless mean that they travel at the speed of light, not faster than it?Agow95 said:No, in mass effect they flow a current through element zero via dark energy, with a positive current, mass is increased, with a negative current, mass is decreased. So they lower the ships mass to nothing and this allows ftl speeds, so to do it the mass effect way we'd need a element that bioware made up and a hypothetical form of energy that may exist.GenGenners said:Hmmm.....
Isn't that similar to how FTL travel works in Mass Effect?
Nothing in Quantum Theory states that warp drive can't exist. I'm not aware of anything in physics that would need to be rewritten.porpoise hork said:Well if its possible then the laws of physics would have to be re-written.XMark said:Just wondering - if a functional FTL drive is invented, what happens to the funny time-related consequences? Would you arrive at your destination before you left?
![]()
According to the Codex it reduces the mass completely, creating greater acceleration, which somehow raises the speed of light within the mass effect field, which also removes Time Dilation (which is effectively travelling forwards in time by moving so fast).theultimateend said:Wouldn't being massless mean that they travel at the speed of light, not faster than it?Agow95 said:No, in mass effect they flow a current through element zero via dark energy, with a positive current, mass is increased, with a negative current, mass is decreased. So they lower the ships mass to nothing and this allows ftl speeds, so to do it the mass effect way we'd need a element that bioware made up and a hypothetical form of energy that may exist.GenGenners said:Hmmm.....
Isn't that similar to how FTL travel works in Mass Effect?
Indeed, it's not as much "FTL" as it is "Taking a short cut while the light goes the long way around" thing. Similar to you making 10 steps uphill while your friend in the car has to take the road up the incline and make a wide turn, you're still slower than them, but you'll be from point A to point B quicker than they are.theultimateend said:You aren't moving faster than light, you are bending space. The ship itself isn't actually moving. Similar to pulling on a table cloth to move a salt shaker on it, the shaker is motionless in relation to its surroundings. It is the distance itself that is being shortened.
I have a feeling the codex writers never took a science class.Agow95 said:According to the Codex it reduces the mass completely, creating greater acceleration, which somehow raises the speed of light within the mass effect field, which also removes Time Dilation (which is effectively travelling forwards in time by moving so fast).theultimateend said:Wouldn't being massless mean that they travel at the speed of light, not faster than it?Agow95 said:No, in mass effect they flow a current through element zero via dark energy, with a positive current, mass is increased, with a negative current, mass is decreased. So they lower the ships mass to nothing and this allows ftl speeds, so to do it the mass effect way we'd need a element that bioware made up and a hypothetical form of energy that may exist.GenGenners said:Hmmm.....
Isn't that similar to how FTL travel works in Mass Effect?
The world economy really just cares little about the poorest nations of the world. They have minimal infrastructure (for transporting products and electricity), little education (for a workforce that can do stuff other than manual labour) and no stability or safety (Kinda hard to set up any industries when they might be raided, looted and burned down with all the employees killed). The only reason to ever set up industries in these nations is because the wages are low.Silva said:The world economy as it is is sadly built around exploiting that starving side, and that includes science as well. Such sacrifice is made for theories. One can only hope that some day, these theories can somehow help those of us starving and killing each other to stop. To me, that's as important, nay, more important, than getting to other stars.
Let's try to make this world as good a place as it can be, -before- we try to go ruin other places. That at least makes sense.
in addition, its prety safe! power goes off > movement of the bubble stops. but your still IN the bubble. so even if you would stick in say, a ROCK your air bubble would still be there so you would not get crushed! *dont ask me where the rock part would be, im guessing where you can from*Deathlyphil said:Brakes aren't needed at all, since the object in the warp bubble is not actually moving. What the field is doing moving space around the object. In Star Trek this is why they aren't affected by time dilation. If this works the same way, then it too should avoid the time dilation effect.vxicepickxv said:The problem with current theoretical brakes that would be easily developed is that the brakes would kind of destroy your destination. They're still working on that part.Acrisius said:How do you hit the brakes in space..?