was hitler a great leader? bad leader?

Recommended Videos

Knight Templar

Moved on
Dec 29, 2007
3,848
0
0
Terrible leader. He was the single biggest asset the allies ever had. He made woeful plans and removed those smart enough to point out how crazy his plans were, replacing them with morons and yes-men.

A bad leader with bad intentions, surrounded by talented people of varying moral worth.
 

Kagim

New member
Aug 26, 2009
1,200
0
0
Actually not really.

He only saved his countries economy by stealing money and land from, then later mass murdering, the Jewish community.

He then led a war that was doomed to fail. His actions in Russia pretty much proved he had no chances of winning.

"hey! lets waste time and resources taking over Stalingrad!"
"I got an idea! lets outfit our men with light clothing to assault siberia!"
"hey, lets attack a country that literally could choke us with there dead!"
"hey, lets lose a quarter of our potential troops by imprisoning a large portion of our population as well as having to guard said prison camps!"

He was a shitty leader in all aspects. The only thing he was good at was propaganda. He managed to turn his own country agaisnt itself. he took advantage of the fact his country was in a shitty state and stole every dime he could from the Jews while simultaneously blaming the Jews for everything so the other 3/4 of the country would support his actions.

He was a Shitty leader of his country and a shitty military tactician.

Fuck him.
 

OldRat

New member
Dec 9, 2009
255
0
0
Well, he had charisma. He knew how to manipulate people. He had, as some have said, presence. He also had the drive to see things through. So yes, he was a great leader. He knew what people wanted and, like every good dictator does, could convince them he was going to give it.
However, he was a horrible strategist who didn't know the first thing about, say, war when things got rough. His goals in the war were, quite frankly, not going to work. Even more so when he figured he'd just go up against the greatest military might of his continent (that being the Soviet Union) half-handedly. His plan to take over the whole Europe all in one big stroke was amusing, to say the least. Of course, the whole Blitzkrieg was based around that, and for a time it worked. He got pretty far, I admit that, but in the end it didn't take.

Ultimately, he was a great leader. Not a genius as I've heard some say, but a great leader still. Sadly, he was very good at figuring out the "why" and "what" of things, and telling it to others also, but when it came to war, his "how" was a little lacking.
 

GammaZord

New member
Jan 26, 2009
289
0
0
He pulled Germany out of a massive depression and created what was probably the world's foremost millitary superpower at the time. Though, WWII also plunged the country right back into depression.

Oh, and he ordered the systematic desruction of an entire race of people--among other things.

Edit: on the strategic side of things he also made a glaring tactical mistake: NEVER, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES ATTEMPT TO CROSS THE RUSSIAN COUNTRYSIDE IN THE WINTER: IT WILL BE YOUR UNDOING!!

Shoulda brushed up on his Napoleonic history. Actually, he shouldn't cuz the world might be a shitty place otherwise.
 

LeQuack_Is_Back

New member
May 25, 2009
173
0
0
On one hand, he brought his country up out of the hole it fell into at the end of the first world war. On the other, he promptly started another war (Right, because it went SO WELL THE FIRST TIME), and then decided to start killing people just for the hell of it, while indoctrinating his people to believe it was a good thing. If he'd stopped at that first part, things might have been better for all parties concerned.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
Tim_Buoy said:
so this is my first time creating a thread be gentle and didn't turn anything up on the search bar
so anyway i was walking through my college campus a few days back when i heard a heated debate between two people one of them was insisting that hitler was a good leader despite the whole mass genocide thing and the other person considered his opinion was worth as much as the cigarette but i had just crushed under my foot and refused to discuss it with him
saying that he cant talk to people that blind to reality. so anyway what do you think

Hitler was a genius and one of the best leaders the world has ever seen. He was right about 99.9% of everything he said, and managed to turn Germany from the huge mess it was after World War I, into a power that almost conquered the world. He was hugely charismatic, and contrary to Hollywood, most of the nations he conquered actually wound up providing manpower for him. The Nazis were not a tiny group of people oppressing the masses, quite the opposite actually.

the problem with Hitler is that you had to watch out for that .1%, where he went quite overboard on a lot of things.

You also have to understand that when it came to the genocide Hitler was not really going "gee, I want to be really evil today", he actually believed that was for the best,
and was able to convince a lot of people who were already anti-semitic that he was right.

The way I learned things was that "The Holocaust" went from dealing with groups of racist Jewish crime/slum lords and loansharks, to a general purge of everything and everyone Jewish irregardless of any involvement with those things, wealth, or anything else. People didn't just decide "boo yah, let's go kill Jews to a man", the hatred was fueled by long lost art treasures and religious relics being pulled out of Synagogues and such, not to mention that you were dealing with Jewish syndicates that operated very much like the mob. The end result was sort of like dropping an A-bomb on Jersey to kill Tony Soprano and his crew. Hitler was very charismatic though, he took the grains of truth that were there (some of which were very ugly) and wove it into something truely terrible.... insane, but he really did believe in what he was doing and had a talent for making others believe it to.

Overall it's a good thing we stopped him, he was a bad guy, though the situation is nowhere near as one sided as most history and movies make it out to be. Reality never is.

As odd as it sounds I think the Harry Potter books summarized Hitler fairly well when they were speaking about Voldemort "He did great things, TERRIBLE things, but great none the less".

One of the reasons why I speak on this subject as much as I do, is because I feel that the general portrayal of Hitler, and the fact that people refuse to see him as anything less than the epitome of pure evil, prevents us from learning the lessons we should be taking away from World War II. I find it very annoying when people insult unpopular leaders with strong positions by comparing them to Hitler when they disagree with them. People tend to miss the entire point that it's not the leader you hate that is likely to wind up being like Hitler, it's the one you love and WANT to believe in who has insanity lingering behind what he's doing right. The nation is too divided right now for any analogy to be made like this in complete certainy, but to put things into perspective Bush and the criticism he received makes him very much unlike Hitler. Obama who is loved by the majority of the media and portrayed almost always in a positive light, yet has things like ACTA hidden behind his
back (or so it would seem) comes a bit closer.
 

Peteron

New member
Oct 9, 2009
1,378
0
0
Hitler was a great speaker, charismatic, and unbelievably innfluencial. In my eyes, those are good leadership qualities. But, as many here have said, he did not exactly have good intentions.
 

Kitteh

New member
Mar 31, 2010
451
0
0
why does hitler always get cred about this sorta thing? was stalin just not there? stalin was the real good leader, bad person.
 

sycoesis

New member
May 31, 2010
212
0
0
in my opinion he was an asshole that should of been shot on sight but he did know how to motivate a country not sure if that makes him a good leader or just good at leading
 

Deadman Walkin

New member
Jul 17, 2008
545
0
0
As many have said, he was a great/charismatic and powerful leader. He pulled Germany out of a horrible depression caused by WWI. However, he was a disgusting evil man.
 

Macheteswordgun

New member
Jul 24, 2010
710
0
0
Abiet i cant remember the speech but my latin teacher spent an entire hour explaining why he is the greatest man in history. But he sadly left and is now teaching for the fighting irish and was on who wants to be a millionare
 

RAMBO22

New member
Jul 7, 2009
241
0
0
Absolutely not. Leaders are leaders because what they do is generally thought of as benevolent behavior or actions that should be emulated by the general populace of whatever sphere he/she may be a leader in. I don't care what else Hitler did to revitalize Germany post WWI, anyone who caused as much sheer terror and death is Hitler is NOT A GOOD LEADER.
 

W8NKA

New member
Jul 15, 2010
136
0
0
Hitler wasn't a good leader as such, more of a cleaver one. He was clever to trick people and to get the top job and was clever to keep it when he did mass genocide.
He was just craffty, slimy, clever barsted.
 

Dfskelleton

New member
Apr 6, 2010
2,851
0
0
I wouldn't call him a "Good" leader. A smart one, yes. An evil one, yes. But good leaders don't try o hide mass genocide from their country.
 

T_ConX

New member
Mar 8, 2010
456
0
0
Karathos said:
It's not about his qualities MAKING UP for a genocide. It's about those qualities existing despite of it.
Billion Backs said:
So I suppose it's cool to judge someone's proficiency in one thing by things that are completely unrelated to it? World's greatest tennis player (I dunno how you'd judge that, maybe by popularity/overall score?) would still be the world's greatest tennis player EVEN if he was a pedophile, serial killer, and a neo-Nazi, at least until the time someone managed to outscore him.

It doesn't mean you're supporting whatever the guy's doing if you admit it. But letting external matters enter the judging of one specific attribute just makes you look like a biased asshole.
I can agree on some of what you two say.

Yes. As a leader, as a charismatic individual who could inspire others to action on a national scale, Hitler was certainly a talented individual. Now, it's sad that he had to use that power for such unarguably awful things, but when it came to leading people (into doing awful things) Hitler was good at it.