Was it really marriage? or was it?

Recommended Videos

Mycroft Holmes

New member
Sep 26, 2011
850
0
0
Firstly, A for effort, but you're not really cut out for trolling. You have to ease people into it. You can't just jump out and act like a retard, it makes things too obvious. You have to say something semi-controversial and then slowly unfold from there so that it seems natural.

Anyways,

Marriage regulation is an outdated practice who's original intent was extremely racist. And assuming we are done being bigots, it's a waste of government regulations and of the time it takes employees to deal with marriage licenses.

Marriage should be a private matter between whatever the hell parties want to be involved and call it a marriage. If you want to found your own religion and have a marriage between yourself, a box turtle and a pair of sneakers that should be your prerogative. You shouldn't be treated any differently under the law than anyone else because of it.
 

Lilani

Sometimes known as CaitieLou
May 27, 2009
6,581
0
0
slypizza said:
okay there may be some out there " but we really want to get married " okay but why do you have to go in front of a church and say "I do" ...African slaves jumped over a broom and they were declared married so do you really want to get married in gods eyes? or do you really just want to be in the government system so you can get free insurance from the demi-god that is the government you all oh so worship. because in my case I say screw them all love who ever you want but don't think having your name in a system makes it legit and bringing god into was just a cover up.
because if this is really the case most of the gays and lesbins are no better then the retarded straights everyone has ulterior motives.
Oh dear. There's something you need to understand about marriage.

These days, marriage comes in two flavors: legal and "religious." In America anyway, a legal marriage is that paper you get from the courthouse and signed by either a justice of the peace or an ordained minister[footnote]Most of the ones in the US are Christian, but other officials from other religions are allowed to have that authority as well.[/footnote]. This is what you get the marriage license for, and this is what makes you officially "married" in the eyes of the state. You don't need any of that religious stuff--you can just get the paper, get it signed by the judge, and be on your way. You're officially married with all the benefits that come with it, and no having to mess with that white dress or repeated vows.

The "religious" marriage I put in quotes there because the term might just be a little too narrow. Basically this is the ceremony that is done in most cases before the signing of the paper. It can be a Christian ceremony, Jewish, Muslim, Cherokee, Blackfoot, Hindu, Buddhist, or even through the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. What goes on in this "ceremony" has nothing to do with you actually getting "married." Granted it's usually the most fun and emotional part of the marriage process, but it's all fluff. You don't need any of it to get married.

What usually happens in a "traditional" marriage is the couple goes through the religious ceremony of their choosing, and afterward while everybody is heading to the reception they go off to the side with the minister or judge who did the ceremony and get them to sign it. If the person you have officiating doesn't have the authority to sign the paper (sometimes people have their close friends or relatives do the wedding), then they'll either have a judge or minister in the wing waiting to sign the paper, or they'll just do it at the courthouse the next day.

And that, my friend, is how marriage works. So when people say "We want gay marriage!" or "We don't want gay marriage!" what they are referring to is the paperwork sent to the state that gives them the legal status of "married" and all of the benefits that come with it. The government has no authority to tell what religious institutions who they can marry and under what circumstances. A Catholic church is allowed to refuse to marry non-Catholics, a Synagogue is allowed to refuse to marry non-Jews, and a Mosque is allowed to refuse to marry non-Muslims. And if there are other people they refuse to marry like gay people or interracial couples, they are allowed to refuse that ceremony.

And nobody is asking that to change. There are many churches now who welcome gay couples, and the number is slowly growing. But again, that doesn't matter in the end because what people are after is the legal marriage.
 

Trippy Turtle

Elite Member
May 10, 2010
2,119
2
43
Why is everyone calling him out on the religious things? I thought he was saying those reasons were bullshit. Maybe I just read it wrong. I thought he was supporting gay marriage here.
I think I might just leave this thread now and never look back.
 
Mar 9, 2010
2,722
0
0
slypizza said:
It goes against the Bible and Gods word and its an insult

Snip.

Think about it.

and just for the people who say I hate gays, I don't, everyone has a right to love who they want but saying you need to make it legit by getting married is kinda weak if you didn't get all that benefits when two are married would this really have been such a big issue?
This is how I picture you



It's about equal rights, not benefits. You're totally a homophobe, you need to evaluate your beliefs and ask if denying people their rights is truly something a benevolent God would allow or encourage. It also helps that God isn't real and enforcing his word means nothing, but I should probably learn to pick my battles.
 

Lilani

Sometimes known as CaitieLou
May 27, 2009
6,581
0
0
Vault101 said:
Lilani said:
great effort...but I feel you may have wasted 10 minutes of your life typing that
Nah, it was definitely at least 15 minutes. I compulsively proofread my posts :S
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
AstroSmash said:
I don't get the criticism. It's a legit question. If marriage (for both hetero and homosexuals) had no benefits, would we all be up in arms about it? Personally, I find the way the governement forces you to enter a 2way contract with your significant other quite horrifying.
It's everything leading up to the question that's drawing fire.

But you asked a question. Basically, if marriage was already equal, would people be all up in arms about it.

Yes, I phrased it that way in hopes that it would sink it.
 

Psykoma

New member
Nov 29, 2010
481
0
0
The question seems to be "If marriage weren't marriage, would people still care about it?"

That kind of hypothetical is annoying as hell.



I do disagree somewhat with those saying equality in marriage is "about equal rights, not benefits", because I don't see it as an either or situation.

I see it as being about equal rights to access benefits.
The benefits can be quantitative (spousal insurance, joint tax filing, etc), and qualitative (being able to see your spouse in hospital, being able to actually say "the government recognizes i'm married").


Overall I'd rather just forget this thread exists.
 

Kalthorine

New member
Feb 1, 2013
2
0
0
It seems that subconsciously even the OP doesn't believe his own rhetoric anyway. Why do I say that? Well, the question in the topic title reads: "Was it really marriage? or was it?"

So let me see... er... well given the apparent choice presented of either "it was a marriage" or "it was a marriage" I choose... ... IT WAS!

;)
 

an annoyed writer

Exalted Lady of The Meep :3
Jun 21, 2012
1,409
0
0
Psykoma said:
Overall I'd rather just forget this thread exists.
I recommend this action. I've never read something out of this guy that makes much sense. Hell, I took a few potshots at one of his earlier threads since he was being very.. uneven with his treatment of people, saying that, and I'm paraphrasing here, "furries deserve equal rights because at least they're not cutting themselves up trying to look like the animals, like transgendered people are doing so to look like the other sex". It's no secret that I have a big problem with that statement. I advise you stay away from this guy. He's like Thor with shitstorms.
 

titankore

New member
Nov 10, 2009
378
0
0
Well, I'm Christian and my church wants to allow gay marriage, and I would love to get married there. So yeah...

You are a D*$%-#$$!
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
Trying to make a point by blubbering on about God's will to a bunch of atheists (the majority on this site, I would imagine) is like telling an adult that Santa won't bring them Christmas presents if they're arse holes. It doesn't work.

Furthermore, the financial cost of something is a rather pathetic excuse for denying people equal rights. Especially when you're on the side that's already in possession of said rights.

Finally, (I'm assuming you're American): read your own fucking constitution. Marriage is a legal matter, meaning God has nothing to fucking do with it.
 

Trull

New member
Nov 12, 2010
190
0
0
Well, considering that king henry the [number]th changed marriage from a one time thing to a multiple time thing, marriage and DIVORCE is the one to do with present-day God. If two gay people get married and never split up, modern day bible-go-to-er's have no power. In a way.

Personally, I think that gay marriage should be called something differently, so that when statistics are made, it can be a giant 'fuck you' to traditional marriage when the consensus points out that marriage has a way higher failure rate.
 

Rascarin

New member
Feb 8, 2009
1,207
0
0
I am engaged to my same-sex partner. There are a few reasons we decided to do this.

- We love each other. We want to honour that love with a committment to each other.
- We want to start a family. Part of that is being seen by the world as a family unit, but another important part is that we have to be married if we want to have both our names on our childrens birth certificates.
- We have more rights as a couple. Say if one of us died, then our estates would pass back to our parents, not to each other. Marriage makes us legally next of kin.
- We want a wedding. We want our family and friends around us while we celebrate our committment to each other.


We're not in it for the tax breaks. Sure, they help, but that's not why we want to marry one another.
 

Petromir

New member
Apr 10, 2010
593
0
0
Trull said:
Well, considering that king henry the [number]th changed marriage from a one time thing to a multiple time thing, marriage and DIVORCE is the one to do with present-day God. If two gay people get married and never split up, modern day bible-go-to-er's have no power. In a way.

Personally, I think that gay marriage should be called something differently, so that when statistics are made, it can be a giant 'fuck you' to traditional marriage when the consensus points out that marriage has a way higher failure rate.
Pity King Henry the 8th was was centuries at least late with the idea of divorce/annulment. Even in Christianity and certainly in the abrahamic faiths as a whole. Divorce certainly existed in the bible, and Jesus himself allowed for divorce in the case of adultery by the other person.

Henry the 8ths contribution to divorce in the UK was pretty much change who the rich and powerful of England had to persuade to let them do it.
 

Screamarie

New member
Mar 16, 2008
1,055
0
0
Trull said:
Well, considering that king henry the [number]th changed marriage from a one time thing to a multiple time thing, marriage and DIVORCE is the one to do with present-day God. If two gay people get married and never split up, modern day bible-go-to-er's have no power. In a way.

Personally, I think that gay marriage should be called something differently, so that when statistics are made, it can be a giant 'fuck you' to traditional marriage when the consensus points out that marriage has a way higher failure rate.
Actually they already kind of do that. They call it a "civil union"...which is actually really insulting. It's kind of like the whole "equality through segregation" thing. They're essentially saying "You're not good enough for OUR kind of marriage, but you're just so darn cute all confused about genders and who you should really be sleeping with...we'll give you a civil union. When you realize how silly your being and you get together with someone of the opposite sex, we'll let you have a REAL marriage."

I honestly don't understand why people give a damn who marries who? Honestly in a world where Kim Kardashien gets married for..what was it, 2? 3 months?, people have no right to cry about the sanctity of marriage. Marriage is a human construct, we can change it any way we like as time goes on.

And much like Kathleen Madigan says, yes I WILL attend your wedding to a goat!
 

Sparrow

New member
Feb 22, 2009
6,848
0
0
Eclipse Dragon said:
I feel like your trying to say something, but I'm not sure what it is...
I'm confused now.

Can someone please explain the message to me?

Marriage doesn't need to be performed in a church, by a priest, for it to be legit in the eyes of the government.
Yeah, I'm gonna need an interpreter. Is the guy for gay marriage or against it or bannana muffin? Or is he speaking in some variation of the English language? Because Google Translate ain't giving me shit.