What age should you have to be to have kids?

Recommended Videos

C95J

I plan to live forever.
Apr 10, 2010
3,491
0
0
VanQQisH said:
It's not a matter of how old you are. It's a matter of whether you are ready for the responsibility of bringing a life into the world. I've know 18yo couples that did a better job of raising their children than some older couples. My mother was 17 when she gave birth to me, and I turned out to be a great guy who never went without anything I needed whether it be food or support from my parents. Whereas I personally know a couple who feed their 2 year old child lollies and soft drink daily. The poor child's teeth are black and decayed already.

TLDR; It's not about age, it's about the capability
this guy explained it all perfectly.
 

Catalyst6

Dapper Fellow
Apr 21, 2010
1,362
0
0
You should be old enough to have a stable, well-paying job as well as a proper education, preferably in the much higher educations ranks. If those things take you until you're fifty years old to get done, well, people live longer and longer all the time...

Fix yourself, then fix up the kids.
 

2012 Wont Happen

New member
Aug 12, 2009
4,286
0
0
Xan Krieger said:
At 20 you're not even old enough to drink here so why should you have a kid at that age?
I would argue that you're old enough to have a kid, so why shouldn't you be able to drink at that age?

In any event, it depends on the individual. There are people who have kids at 20 and do fine. There are others who have kids at 30 and are awful parents. There should be no general standard set on such individual things.
 

AndyFromMonday

New member
Feb 5, 2009
3,921
0
0
FamoFunk said:
Why brush every young parent with the same brush? The last two paragraphs could be said for any age wo/man

A lot of people in their 30's sure as hell ain't ready for children but pop them out none the less... the way I've seen what is suppose to be fully grown mature adult talk to and treat their children is fucking disgusting (Yes, young parents do this too, but a shite load of "older" ones do too), my Daughter has and will continue to have the best life any child could ask for, the love I have for her is one you cannot describe.

Sorry if I seem very defensive, but it does get annoying when, just because you fall into the age category, you're automaticaly a bad parent.
I'm sorry if I came off like that. The thing is, during your 20's you're basically building your life. You're attempting to get a career, start a relationship and basically get your life in order. I just don't see how you could make place for a child in there. I'm sure there are great young parents out there and I guess I'm a bit biased due to how my own mother "raised" me.
 

Pegghead

New member
Aug 4, 2009
4,017
0
0
I'd probably say over thirty, by then you're established and you've had your fun. NOW LET THE TORTURE BEGIN (jk).
 

Digital_Hero

New member
Jan 27, 2010
120
0
0
108Stitches said:
Phoenix09215 said:
Technically its 16... But I personally can't see myself having kids until, at the earliest, 25. But if your capable and mature than any age after 16 I guess? (although after 40 is getting a bit ridiculous)
I had kids at 24 and at 42...guess what. Age doesn't matter. And why is after 40 a bit ridiculous or why should it be kept below 35?
I dont think this was answered yet, but if I remember correctly, women carrying over the age of 40 or so have increased chances for miscarriage, and other abnormalities or "mutations" so to speak, such as downs syndrome. its not recommended, but you can still do it and although the chances increased, they are still relatively low for any of that to happen.

btw congrats on your kids :D

OT: it really is about when the parents are ready to have the kids, and thats based on maturity, not age.
TBH, my dad is 48 and doesnt know a damn thing about raising kids. im pretty much the "spiritual parent" for my siblings haha
 

red ant

New member
May 18, 2009
38
0
0
I think something like 22-25 is the ideal time because before that age a female because after 25 there is an increased chance of genetic problems. After 35 there are extremely increased amount of infants born with disabilites. (almost 20 times I think compared to at age 25) At 45 it increases to about 70 times. Age 55 it increases to 200 times or something like that.

These numbers are for infants born with disabilities numbering 3 out of 10,000 for age 25, 60 out of 10,000 for age 35, 210 out of 10,000 at age 45, and almost 600 out of 10,000 at age 55 for females. I do not have the exact numbers as I forgot the exact location of the statistics.

If you are talking about financial stability on the other hand for most people they should be in their 30s.
 

justnotcricket

Echappe, retire, sous sus PANIC!
Apr 24, 2008
1,205
0
0
Here's a quick checklist:

Are you in a stable relationship? (Not *necessarily* with the child's father)
Are you otherwise able to support yourself and the child? (with the minimum of help from anyone - your parents might help you if you were in trouble, but they shouldn't *have* to raise another child).
Have you finished highschool?
Are you old enough to legally have sex? (should cut off the scariest bracket)

If the answer is yes to all of these, then I think having a child is reasonable - and you're probably somewhere in the region of 18-30, which is old enough. Look, at the end of the day, provided you are able to love and care for your child properly by yourself, then you're probably old enough. It's like getting married - if it's the right time for you it's the right time for you.

I personally would like to wait until I have a few more bits of my life in order (e.g. finished grad school) before I embark on that sort of challenge, but that doesn't mean that people who are 20 are too young. If you think about it, 20 is actually quite old, it's just the way that society is set up these days and the fact that our life expectancy is so much longer than in previous centuries that makes us feel that 20 is so young.
 

Dark Knifer

New member
May 12, 2009
4,468
0
0
Alllowed should be 18. Encouraged should be 25ish. It is hard to set an age for all people since some could cope with a child at age 18. Minority yes, but making it a crime would not be really fair.
 

Gigano

Whose Eyes Are Those Eyes?
Oct 15, 2009
2,281
0
0
Above the age of consent, and then whatever age each individual reach the psychological ability, environmental stability, and financial capabilities to provide adequate nurture for a child.

In general, probably around some 28 - 30 years, with variations from some 15 - 16 years to never at all as the realistic extremes where these conditions could be met.
 

tofulove

New member
Sep 6, 2009
676
0
0
i don't think age matter as much as genetics, unless your extremely smart, extremely healthy and fit, or a healthy mix of the 2 you shouldn't have kids, there enough average and below average spawns in this world.
 

johnsom

New member
May 28, 2009
241
0
0
Xan Krieger said:
I ask this because a number of girls that I know have had kids at the age of 20 and I think that's a good number of years too young. I think something like 25 is more appropriate. At 20 you're not even old enough to drink here so why should you have a kid at that age? Besides, you should be enjoying your youth, not putting yourself through the pain and committment of having a kid.

What do the members of the escapist think about this?
Yea, 25 but I think it is relative to the person. Some people should never have kids. That is harsh and I have no right(outside of the constitution) to say so but what the hell.
 

rookie.of.the.year

New member
Jul 30, 2010
103
0
0
I want to say age doens't matter maturity does, but...

I really do feel that no matter how mature you are you need to experience life and let yourself have messed up boozey nights and make mistakes and be an all round general idiot and child fist before you have your own.
And financial security is a must, thats the first responsibility you have for your child, and it has to be there.

And you have to havce finished school and everything first, because, I know people may hate me for this, I do think that here is a certain class that has the teenage pregnancies, and the majority just have their kids and live off the state, and their kids then become teenage parents and they're stuck in a cycle.

That said, my cousin is 19 and pregant, too young yess, but there was nothing that she wanted to do that a baby would hinder, she was done with school and has a very decent income for her age, has a car and is just moving into her first house. But then again she has been there and done that with all kinds of stupid stuff, so she's not missing out on any kind of life that a 19 year old should have, because she's done it.
 

sapphireofthesea

New member
Jul 18, 2010
241
0
0
I would say it is not age specific but condition specific. When you have a child you are rasing another human, one you have to care for and provide for without any assistance from them. As a result one should wait until they have reached some degree of stablity in their lives (emotional and economical) before having a child.
We cannot prepare for everything but we should at least have enough to handle a few hard times which will enevitably come along as once you have a child you are alot less mobile and so need to weather more storms as oppose to dodging them as you would alone.
Remember, if you move to a nearby town you can still drive and meet your friends or talk to them on the phone, for a 6 yearold those friends are lost forever and they will suffer for it (as an example). We can't always stop it but the more prepared we are the less likely it will have to happen.
 

WaderiAAA

Derp Master
Aug 11, 2009
869
0
0
108Stitches said:
WaderiAAA said:
Lower limit:
None, but you got to be mature enough and preferably plan having the baby rather than accidentally getting pregnant

Upper limit:
I'd say 35 as a general rule. From there on out, the possibilities of the child getting deformaties and various handicaps increase with your age. Of course, if you don't find the right partner until you are 40 and want a child, then no one will blame you, but otherwise, try to keep it below 35.

Phoenix09215 said:
Technically its 16... But I personally can't see myself having kids until, at the earliest, 25. But if your capable and mature than any age after 16 I guess? (although after 40 is getting a bit ridiculous)
I had kids at 24 and at 42...guess what. Age doesn't matter. And why is after 40 a bit ridiculous or why should it be kept below 35?
Well, just statistics. I tried to find a proper graph, but all I found was this:

http://www.wddty.com/giving-birth-over-30.html

Still, it seems what it mostly refer to is if your giving birth for the first time at an age over 40.

EDIT: Found a better one:
http://www.babyhopes.com/articles/birthdefects.html

This is actually pretty nuanced, and my sceptisism toward late birth is lowered a bit by it, but still.