Closest alignment I can think of. Has a goal, so it isn't neutral. Means to help, so it's good. Random and psychotic, so it's chaotic. But I see your point, I am killing dudes. Chaotic good in the Sam and Max or Dexter kind of way, I guess.Skeleon said:I'm not sure murdering random people still counts as good.A random person said:Chaotic good. I mean well for people, but I'm a bit of a sociopath in the process of achieving good. I.E: I would console a suicidal person in conflict with their oppressive boss or teacher and kill said boss or teacher. Or stop an abusive boarding school by killing the staff and headmaster with chainsaws. Also, the people I most dislike are lawful evil, like fundies, self righteous imposing bastards they are.
Isn't chaotic good more about, I dunno, stealing stuff or not following the speed-limit?
Somewhat mixed up chaotic neutral and evil.Gormourn said:I don't think Chaotic Neutral means that.
It means that while you "can" be fighting against the evil oppressors and being generally good, you can also at the same time do more personal and negative things.
I mean, if I "were" a DnD character, I could be helping some supposedly good cause but it also wouldn't stop me from killing a perfectly normal "good" character that I just don't like for his money and stuff if I knew that nobody would know it or that I would be able to hide it.
I think chaotic neutral is the most realistic alignment. You're basically "gray", not some kind of extremely good or extremely evil stereotype.
So you are saying that if you are in power you will willing make life hard for people, raise taxes, enforce harsh laws with harsher punishments. Now I would really like to think that you are talking about this "Darth Morbus" character you have rather then your actual self. One can only hope.Darth Mobius said:That surprised me, because it also said I was True Neutral. Of course, it never asked me what I would do if I WAS the government. THAT is where My EVIL side comes in... As I said, I believe I would be Lawful Evil.ILPPendant said:As I suspected, the Wizards alignment quiz comes up with True Neutral.
I generally try to be relaxed about things and if I see something coming I'll weather the storm. This mellowness seems to translate into a kind of alignment apathy, where I'm not particularly committed to good or law, but generally prefer them because the alternatives are rather more unpleasant.
I really fail to construct a proper response to this so I'll just ask a question.Gormourn said:Not really. I don't believe that complete randomness is the right way to show Chaotic Neutral-ness.
I see Chaotic Neutral being "gray" and not being truly bound by the normal good/evil ideals.
A Good character of any type would seek out actively to do good deeds, and an Evil character seeks out to do evil deeds like randomly kicking dogs and just slaughtering random people. A neutral character is just neutral. They don't have to actively follow the "good" or the "bad" team.