Pyro Paul said:
but there is a big problem with your point.
You are Apart of Nature.
and Nature is not all Double rainbows and Bubblegum lollypops.
That has nothing to do with my point at all. Seems like it has flown over your head, again. The problem I see here is that you're using naturalistic fallacy arguments in order to excuse yourself for being unnecessarily cruel to other animals. Yes, nature isn't nice all the time but that's not an excuse to chuck a live mammal into your rubbish bin stuck on a sheet of superglue when the option is there for a mercy kill. You're just deliberately prolonging its misery, it's disgusting.
A cat may be "cruel" when toying with a mouse, but a cat does not know any better - it's only acting on instinct. It's not like a human who has the cognitive ability to recognise that something is in pain, yet deliberately prolongs it (and makes weak excuses for it). Hell, it's not even about the animal - it's your mindset. You can replace "rat" with "dog" and it'd be the same (that is the scary part). Do you really think it is mentally stable for someone to be that cruel to something, and dismiss it because "oh worse things happen in nature" ?
when ever your done trying to shill your mightier-then-thou routine and realize that Life, and Nature are a lot more gritty and dirty then your ivory towers Feel free to join the Rest of humanity.
This has absolutely nothing to do with nature and life being gritty. You're trying to paint such animals as close to objects as possible in order to justify your cruelty towards them. Your justifications for torturing animals are laughable.
Oh look, a dog. I am going to kick it because nature and life are gritty and dirty! Nevermind that it's a completely unnecessary act and the dog will feel pain from it. Same thing with throwing a live glue trapped animal into a rubbish bin (implying that you're treating the animal as an object, a piece of rubbish). The point of the matter is, there's a difference between getting rid of a pest and deliberately drawing out its agony. And your reasoning is that nature is not nice all the time? What a load of absolute tosh.
What is not true? Are you denying that they feel pain, and deny that mammalian nervous systems are similar? Funny, that... I never said anything about the emotional component we humans take for granted. That said, it has been shown rats get depressed when their cagemate dies - so do dogs when their owner dies. You say all of it is reactionary but don't even consider the fact that something like a rat or a dog can be traumatised by such events and show it through unusual behaviour. They learn from such experiences.
Pain is just a chemical reaction.
it is the subsquent actions which occur because of it that speak tomes of an organism.
Pain is also an unpleasant experience, we strive to minimise it. Doing the same for animals because we know it's unpleasant for them too, and sympathise. It's called having empathy. I felt sorry for the animal in my situation because it was in a great amount of pain, and it was unnecessary for the animal to have gone through that. That it might have been a pest, in that context, is entirely irrelevant. The animal is no more or less deserving of a quick dispatch than any other - your arguments seem to imply that it is OK to do something like this simply because they exist.
And the way you kill something, and casually disregard how painful it is on the notion that "nature is cruel" speaks tomes of your personality. Seems like pointless cruelty to animals is your thing, and worse, you're trying to defend it.