Oh yes and Demon's Souls. He was too lazy to even try and get past the first couple of levels. Granted that 'review' was more comedic because he basically said that the reason he didn't like it was because he was too shit to actually play it.
amuasyeas said:Many things. He has an unbelievably short attention span and can't appreciate game complexity or depth.
Well, I wouldn't say 'strongly' disagree. I just think that he judges most of the games he talks about too harshly. That doesn't mean he doesn't make good points as well though. Even in the harshest, most cynical lay various degrees of truth.Nazulu said:That's perfectly fine man. However, just because people agree with a lot of his points, doesn't make them a cynics. And if they are cynics, I doubt they became that way because of Yahtzee. Also, I find it harsh to say someones opinions as "wrong" without backing it up. So share with us what you strongly disagree with.
Comedians can be commentators. And as Yahtzee offers non-comedy commentary as well, I would say that he has very real stances that could very well be relevant here. Odten, his jokes are trumped up versions of his own opinions. But that still means they're based on real opinions.sanquin said:Yahtzee is not a reviewer. He's a comedian.
Is that actually what he claimed, though? Below is a quote from the Extra Punctuation article "On RTS Games" [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/columns/extra-punctuation/7938-On-RTS-Games], where he states rather plainly not that there's anything wrong with the RTS genre, but that they're just not to his taste:Nazulu said:Big like: real time strategy games can't compete with the snake riding experience in Shadow of the Colossus. To me that's just crap. There is still a lot of room for improvement and it goes against my motto, "anything is possible with art".
Anyway, I don't often disagree with Yahtzee, because our taste in games happens to be very similar. I never cared much for most real-time strategy games either, along with the majority of fighters or JRPGs. As a general rule, I'll agree with just about any criticism he makes, but those criticisms will always mean less to me than they do to him, and thus if Yahtzee dislikes or is indifferent toward a game, I will never dislike or be bored by it as much as him (consequently, if he does outright like a game, I know it's a game I should play). I agree with just about every flaw he's found in the Pokemon, Halo, or Super Smash Bros. games, but the enjoyable aspects of those games are able to override the flaws to me, and therefore I still like them, so Yahtzee's dislike doesn't bother me (the same goes for his views on multiplayer). [sub]Although I do agree with the OP's example of his claim that all fighting games can be reliably mastered simply by mindless button-mashing.[/sub]Yahtzee said:I'm not saying [Starcraft 2]'s bad or an unnecessary sequel, although it could well be both of those things. I'm saying my opinion on StarCraft 2, or indeed any real time strategy game, is about as much use as Roger Ebert's opinion on gaming as a whole. Or Ug the caveman's opinion on the diesel engine. I don't play them. I've never been able to get into them. They're just not my cup of tea. Okay?