AlloAllo said:
I'm not saying "let our poor, innocent teenagers have children" and no, it's not the choice I would have done. I'm saying that if they chose to keep the baby and are happy with it, why should it bother you?
Why does it bother me? Take a look at this graph :http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b7/Population_curve.svg (I don't know how to embed images.)
See that massive spike over on the side there? That's the result of exponential growth. That number is only going to get higher at an even faster rate than it did before. And guess what? The Earth can't support that many people. A lower population would help out with practically every major problem that we have in the world today. Too few jobs? Not with less people. Disease rates out of control? The less opportunity the disease has to jump from one host to the next in a crowded space, the better. Pollution and greenhouse gas emissions? Less people will mean less driving/pollution.
Teen pregnancy is a huge number, and it is contributing to this population boom that we're having. But why teen pregnancy over anything else? Mostly because they are practically guaranteed to grow up in a crappy environment, leading to more criminals being born and walking the streets. In fact, crime rates dropped significantly in the late 20th century due to abortions becoming legal about 1 generation earlier.
Even if they aren't criminals, being born to a poor family means that someone is less likely to graduate even from high school and that they will probably have kids of their own.
Teenagers having kids is, for the most part, a detriment on nearly every facet of society today, which is why it should be taken care of in a concise and effective way.