You do know that the Americans were winning the war in Vietnam by a large margin don't you? And that the US entered into the war because the South Vietnamese government asked for their assistance?Epitome said:Nobody asked you to police the world, Vietnam is a bad example btw you could not have won short of commiting genocide and losing alot more of your own. You were fighting an entrenched enemy on ther turf against guerilla tactics. They would never have given up or surrendered and they had nowhere to go, they would have fought to the last man. America was only their becasue Vietnam didnt want to be a French colony anymore and Communism scared the US. Try solving your own problems befor eyou start telling everybody else how to do their thing. Your culture works for you, forcing it on other countries is what gets you the international animosity.
You know, despite us not committing as many troops as America to world policing, I'm not actually that cut up about it. War is bad. I disagree with war. I do not take our lesser military involvement as a bad thing.HotFezz8 said:I strongly advise you to read the logistics chapter of "Lions Donkeys and Dinosaurs" by Lewis Page. in fact i advise everyone to read all of "Lions Donkeys and Dinosaurs" by Lewis Page.Angerwing said:I know that what you're saying is all a joke, but I must say this:HotFezz8 said:too far away to care (australia).
I heard those new-fangled flying machines go pretty quick now?
whilst the auzzie special ops are free to prance around where and when they like (like most SF forces) only the US actually have enough flying thingies to keep a armoured division supplied for any lenght of time. let alone transport one, and thats with 300+ super heavy lift aircraft and 700 odd hercules. the brits have barely the capability to keep a battalion supplied, (and it needs to be a light battalion and have friendly air space. and be no futher afield than turkey. and preferably it shouldn't be fighting too hard. and forget about reinforcements...) but largely yes i joke ;-)
that said have australia actually committed a sizeable force to any US/UN venture recently? as in since vietnam?
Good job Custer.Biek said:Yes but what about GREAT AMERICAN FREEDOM FUCK YEAH! *crotch thrust*
The South Vietnamese government was a puppet to western forces, if I remember correctly. And America was winning every battle, yet they lost the war. How much they were winning by was irrelevant; they would not have been able to capture Vietnam any way shy of killing almost every Vietcong or NVA member.Axolotl said:You do know that the Americans were winning the war in Vietnam by a large margin don't you? And that the US entered into the war because the South Vietnamese government asked for their assistance?
Uh... no. No they don't. They don't even have the privilege to punch you in the face. That's assault, and they aren't exempt from the rules. The worst way to get someone's respect is to threaten violence.Branches said:You have the right to say what you want. They have the right to punch you in the fucking face if they disagree.
And we have better rations than the Americans. They trade jeeps with 50 cals for them.Alkestes said:I think US soldiers are jealous that the British army are better trained. >:
I... I...Jonesy911 said:I think the majority of modern day soldiers are fools that are brain washed by propaganda and their own idiocy who sign up to go and kill people.
The government tells us that murder is illegal but then it employs millions of people to go and murder people all over the world, why is the government exempt from its own rules?
I think you've mentioned mongooses almost every time I see you post.mrhappyface said:I always wondered what civilians though of us when we go by. Here in Hawaii, military personell are as common as mongooses, but they aren't as common on the mainland. Most people here in Hawaii think of us cordially and think of us very highly. What do you think of US soldiers?
I once watched a mexican kid and a black kid throw a kitten into a wall until it died. So by that logic all mexicans and blacks torture kittens?B T A M R D said:I think they throw puppies off of cliffs....and that makes me sad panda.![]()
....so has everything else, doesnt mean the book is no longer relevant. are you going to say 1984 is no longer relevant because its now 2010? Or maybe Das Kapital, because the cold war is over. Or maybe the Prince, because politics has changed since the Renaissance....mrhappyface said:Oh Goddamit, war changed since WW1 !!!!scifidownbeat said:Right now I'm reading Johnny Got His Gun by Dalton Trumbo.
I believe my post is finished now.