Subbies said:
We don't have something that animals don't. We have the same, it's just that we have MORE of certain things and LESS of others. We are smarter, have more tools, are capable of projecting ourselves farther in the future, have a more developped language, more creativaty. Anything that implies the use of our brain is better than whatever animals can come up with. But on the other hand we have less fur, no claws, less stregth (in certain cases), etc. Get the picture?
We've done in just 200 years what the animal kingdom
didn't even attempt to do in over 200 million years. Think about that for a second. The animal kingdom has had hundreds of millions of years to figure this shit out. They've had millions of different species to try with, and all the time in the world. We show up and go from living in stone buildings to landing on the motherfucking moon in just a couple hundred years. If that isn't proof that we're more creative and more intelligent than animals for you then you're a lost cause and it isn't worth even trying to open your mind a bit.
Face it, Fido is not as creative as his owner. It's that simple. And I won't buy the "But their bodies aren't fit for it" argument, because our bodies aren't fit to be the apex predator. But that didn't stop us from ruling this planet whether nature likes it or not. Mankind has the final say, if it doesn't want a species to exist that species ceases to exist. If mankind wants to eat it, mankind will eat it. And if something threatens mankind, mankind will fancy it into a nice living room decoration. If mankind wants to, mankind can wipe the entire planet free of life with the press of a button.
If animals lacking opposable thumbs had the same intelligence and creativity we do they would have figured out a way around their physical limitations just the same as we did, and we wouldn't be having this debate.