MGlBlaze said:
stinkychops said:
MGlBlaze said:
May be a bad example, but; football or any other major sport. At one point it probably started off as some child's game no-one took seriously, and look how such a stupidly big deal they have become.
I will give you that games are a past-time that is meant to be fun, but other games (most notable first person shooters and real-time strategy) require fast thinking, fast reflexes, strategy, planning, skill and determination. Kinda like most sports, actually. Funny, that. There are tournaments for games, after all.
There's nothing stopping people from saying they're a fun past-time, because that's true; saying that it's wrong to take them seriously at the same time, though, is a mark of ignorance. The bottom line is, if you want them to just be fun, then that's okay. Just don't expect everyone else to share your views all the time.
You seem to have gone and ignored your own point. Soccer and other sports did start off as nothings and slowly over time they grew to be accepted parts of society, and accepted socially to be played competitively. This doesent mean that the people who first played it weren't being silly when they proclaimed themself hardcore soccer players (if they did, its an analogy). If gaming grows to be this kind of thing then great, there can be 'hardcore' people as much as a dislike the phrase. However in the present, which is all that matters there aren't and its not.
I have made a mistake... but it isn't what you listed. My mistake was placing some small faith in human beings to realise that my analogy was to draw attention to things that seemed rediculous or wrong in the past that have become commonplace now; including how games apparently all "corrupt people" despite Television, movies, jazz and God-knows what else having apparently done the exact same thing not all that long ago. No, I asked to much from those miserable creatures. I need to state myself more explicitly.
The point was to try and look to the past for a more enlightened and intelligent view of the present; looking at similar events in the past to what things are like now to try and reach a more open-minded state for things to come, but again I was apparently asking too much.
Now I suddenly remember EXACTLY why I hold the general human race with nothing but contempt.
Edit;
Also, if some of what I said loops around on itself a bit, that's because I'm really tired right now.
Ha, the funny thing about what you have just said is how massive a leap it is. First of all, this 'explicit' point you're making is not only one everyone has been over a hundred times, it is one that does not contradict what I have just said.
So, because I have interpretted your (as you suggest, subtle/poorly written) post differntly to how you meant it I have somehow angered you so much you now hold the entire human race in contempt. Truly laughable. If however you're trying to say that I have reminded you of why you hate it, the point of people fearing every new medium is not nearly as stupid as you suggeat. Just because the ones in the past have done no harm does not mean we can assume that the ones in the future are fine. Doing some studies and looking at it logically, surprise suprise, is the logical thing to do. Just because it impedes on your hobby does not make it hideous.
I looked back on the past, assesed it intelligently and considered your view before coming to my own conclusion. It is your arrogance and anger that disappoints me.