What game series do you wan't to kill? (painfully)

Recommended Videos

jhonka

New member
Dec 11, 2008
23
0
0
Tomb raider 1 and 2 were actually good(and not just for having the greatest animated tits avaible at the time), but every title after those should be H-bombed along with the creators!

Every sonic after #2
every game containing the ff title
-"- soccer/ice hockey/nba etc games after like the turn of the millenium(they *are* the same game for chrissakes!!)
Resident evil games despite the first
 

Trivun

Stabat mater dolorosa
Dec 13, 2008
9,831
0
0
Turok (although I have a grudge because I was crap at Turok: Evolution which is weird because normally I'm a very good gamer, not being arrogant or anything), and also any EA game
 

AgentNein

New member
Jun 14, 2008
1,476
0
0
Arker said:
ANYTHING Nintendo. Although they might not be considered sequels, just the same god-forsaken game over and over, with slightly less crappy graphics.
Have you ever played a couple of Mario games? There's more innovation and change between two successive games in that franchise than there is in most entire franchises.
 

chuckman1

Cool
Jan 15, 2009
1,511
0
0
Sonic, Tomb Raider, Silent Hill and, Resident Evil. Oh and World of Warcraft so I can see millions of nerds cry.
 

zSgt PePPeR

New member
Sep 27, 2008
8
0
0
I think if series start to end at number 3 or 4(like people are suggesting) then you are reducing the amount of great games on the Market.Look at the amount of truly great series that became better as they aged.Mario 64 revolutionised 3-d platforming.Resident evil 4 is considered one of the greatest games of all time as is Zelda Orcarina of time.Most peoples favourite Final Fantasies are 6/7/8.Metal gear solid 4, Grand theft Auto 4 and Fallout 3 pretty much won between them every game of the year award available.Call of Duty 4 is one of the best online shooters ever made.With quality developers the series can go on as long as they like i think.

On the other side of that argument is the constant re-packaging of drivel like Tomb raider and most thinks EA touch(Not Dead Space:)).Personally I think Sonic needs to die before the once great name is soiled even further.Need for speed can explode for all i care aswell.
 

gamegod25

New member
Jul 10, 2008
863
0
0
My list of games and other things that need to be taken behind the shed.

Sonic (goodbye old yeller)
Dynasty Warriors (how many times can you release the same fucking game?)
WWII games (im sick of killing nazis, seriously)
MGS (rest in peace you preachy, overwritten pile of tripe)
Condemned (cause of death: Indigo Prophecy Syndrome)
Mini-game collections (enough already Nintendo!)
Unskippable cutscenes (just shut up and let me play already)
Blatent setups for sequels ("to be continued" me:.....FUCK!)
 

Valiance

New member
Jan 14, 2009
3,823
0
0
I don't necessarily want to kill a franchise. I'd like if people were less fanatical about something being awesome and could just step back and look at it if it was something else.

But I suppose that applies to many games, and I can't really say which is best.



But if I had to pick something, I'd go with Halo.
 

sheic99

New member
Oct 15, 2008
2,316
0
0
gamegod25 said:
MGS (rest in peace you preachy, overwritten pile of tripe)
You do realize that Hideo Kojima already stated that MGS4 was the last in the story line.
 

Aura Guardian

New member
Apr 23, 2008
5,114
0
0
Patrick_and_the_ricks said:
I'm surprised I was expecting sonic hate not racing game hate. aw well, I'll just half to burn him alive myself.
Sonic isn't as bad as the crap made by EA or Square Enix. Sonic can still go on. Just Square-Enix and EA have to go