What Games Do You Think Are Over Rated?

Recommended Videos

blipblop

New member
May 21, 2009
571
0
0
TFU: it was so hyped whit the fact that everything broke like irl and the enemy´s had great AI and would healp each other. but when you playd the game you hardly ever notice this att all because your shooting more lightning out your arse then thor and all lightning stikning gods together.
well starwars games are always a bit of russian roulette.

halo 3: to easy to boring

fallout3: you want to do everything but never know where to start and get too bored to finish the game. sorry but I havent finished it yet.

Assassins creed: great story, but it was so repetitive and the sneak aspect of the game was crap, you could take out intire armys without getting hurt.
 

scotth266

Wait when did I get a sub
Jan 10, 2009
5,202
0
0
Samurai Goomba said:
and the weapons are all fairly balanced and useful.
Other than this sentence, I agree with you. The weapons weren't even close to balanced, a problem that they mostly fixed in 3.

And this thread is a repetitious repeater of redundancy. IT. HAS. BEEN. DONE. I'm not one to harp the search bar, but c'mon. Do we really need the same 5 threads clogging up the forum every day? It just gets old after the first time, and this is about the fourth.

This is why I love the review section: each thread is unique, so no repeats :D
 

Lord Beautiful

New member
Aug 13, 2008
5,940
0
0
Samurai Goomba said:
*wall of text*
I can't find a single disagreement with your argument for Halo, and it is reassuring to see a handful of Escapists who don't blindly bash the Halo series.
 

beholdmycape

New member
Apr 10, 2009
252
0
0
needausername said:
sorry user name taken. said:
Assassin's Creed-- yes its very well made i just couldn't get into it
Actually, a lot of critics didn't like it, I dunno why though. On topic, GTAIV was a terrible game.
I was pretty confused about the constant requests you get from people calling up and asking to go fucking bowling or whatever.
It's fun the first time and I thought that would be it....heh, no.
 

HellbirdIV

New member
May 21, 2009
608
0
0
WarCraft III.

The story is quite enjoyable, and the Campaign missions are interesting, but the Multiplayer is just crap. In simple words, the Heroes completley ruin the gameplay and make fights downright unbalanced. Would it have been too much to include an option to disable Heroes in multiplayer games, so as to mimic, say, StarCraft, you know, a -good- game?

WarCraft III is very overrated as an RTS. As a linear strategy-RPG hybrid, it works fine.