the rye said:
Wait, wait, wait if emotions like love have nothing to do with biology then are you saying these emotions some how exist as a seperate substance from our physical selves.
No, I didn't mean it literaly. I just meant there's more to it than chemicals in the brain. I mean, sure technically, everything we feel is a counterpart of our brain reacting to certain chemicals being released, but I think there's more to it than that. Afterall, it's possible to like someone, be infactuated with them, and still not love them.
At the same time, it's possible to love someone who's treated you horribly. And when you think about them, you can't help but feel negative emotions, and think about what horrible things they've done to you. And still, you know you love them.
I just think there's more to it than a chemical 'attachment'. Like, a dog could be attached to its master, and could be the most loyal friend one person would have. But I still don't think it's the same, as, say, even platonic love. Where two best friends know they can depend on one another more than they can depend on their own family.
I just think that love requires a combination of what we know as well as what we feel. So if you want to associate knowledge with biology, then yes, it is all biological.