I'm only going to answer part of this, as the question of "What is love" is best answered only via Haddaway reference, which has already been done multiple times, or via the acknowledgement that it is a series of chemical reactions in the brain that make us feel good around another person, and quite likely inclined to breed with them.
As for it being better not having love? I'd agree with that, to an extent. Unrequited love; Yeah, you're better off without it. Mutual love that lasts? I would give up anything in the world for it. Yeah, I'd get further in life on my own, I'd be more successful, more determined, more motivated and more focused without love, I'd get to my dreams, and I'd live on top of the world, but I see no point in that without someone to share it with. What point is there in doing it all on your own?
Love isn't necessary, but neither is happiness, kindness, peace, companionship, your car, your job, the roof over your head or 90% of the things you own. Its also not there to make life more easy and bearable. Love is not the means to an end, it is its own end.
What is the point of something tangible?
Why is amassing 12 billion dollars worth more than finding the one person you want to share the rest of eternity with?
It seems to outweigh tangible accomplishments because it does outweigh them. Tangible things in life have no meaning. What use is 12 billion dollars if you have nothing to spend it on? What use is a fancy car if there's nowhere you want to drive it? What use is flying to the moon if you have no reason to want to?
Its the intangible things that make life worth living. With those 12 billion dollars you can have an amazing time, do whatever you want, and make yourself - at least temporarily - happy. With the car you can drive yourself to the places you want to go, and enjoy those places, or even just the experience of driving. Flying to the moon gives a great sense of accomplishment, inspires dreams and fulfills them too. Dreams, Enjoyment and Happiness are all intangible, yet they are what make life worth living. Love is just something else like that. Its something you live for.
I wouldn't put it quite like that. You need a lot more qualifiers there. For example, I have a massive amount of friends. They are always talking to me. My family is always there for me. I'm always doing something with someone else, I'm never alone, and there is never no-one I can talk to. I still feel like absolute shit after heartbreak though. I'm not lonely. Its something different. It is difficult to explain, and that's why you never really get a straight answer on it.Madara XIII said:To throw away so much not for love... as I refuse to acknowledge it as such, but what it truly is. Comfort. Comfort coupled with some whimsical affection and greed. By an objective standpoint that's what this "love" really amounts to. To feel some comfort or find relief from loneliness.
Not entirely sure what you mean by this, but I'd say no, not really. Loneliness is the need for a connections with other people, and being unable to satisfy that connection - being alone.Man's loneliness is just his fear of life after all?
No-one. No-one has ever, so far as I know, said you need love to get to your dreams. More often its that love is a part of someone's dreams.Whose to say one needs "love" to conquer their dreams or ambitions? Is it not better to not have to rely on such an emotional crutch? To stand on one's own ? Is this comfort we seek really necessary or is it there to make life slightly more easy and bearable?
As for it being better not having love? I'd agree with that, to an extent. Unrequited love; Yeah, you're better off without it. Mutual love that lasts? I would give up anything in the world for it. Yeah, I'd get further in life on my own, I'd be more successful, more determined, more motivated and more focused without love, I'd get to my dreams, and I'd live on top of the world, but I see no point in that without someone to share it with. What point is there in doing it all on your own?
Love isn't necessary, but neither is happiness, kindness, peace, companionship, your car, your job, the roof over your head or 90% of the things you own. Its also not there to make life more easy and bearable. Love is not the means to an end, it is its own end.
Why should it not?I am left to wonder why something so intangible and practically nonexistent seems to outweigh the tangible accomplishments or success of humanity when it comes to value.
What is the point of something tangible?
Why is amassing 12 billion dollars worth more than finding the one person you want to share the rest of eternity with?
It seems to outweigh tangible accomplishments because it does outweigh them. Tangible things in life have no meaning. What use is 12 billion dollars if you have nothing to spend it on? What use is a fancy car if there's nowhere you want to drive it? What use is flying to the moon if you have no reason to want to?
Its the intangible things that make life worth living. With those 12 billion dollars you can have an amazing time, do whatever you want, and make yourself - at least temporarily - happy. With the car you can drive yourself to the places you want to go, and enjoy those places, or even just the experience of driving. Flying to the moon gives a great sense of accomplishment, inspires dreams and fulfills them too. Dreams, Enjoyment and Happiness are all intangible, yet they are what make life worth living. Love is just something else like that. Its something you live for.