shut up, its my opinion, I really dont like the game, the way the mechanics work make the game feel broken to me.Fraser.J.A said:Either you have been amazingly lucky in your gaming life or you need to get down off that fucking bandwagon.
shut up, its my opinion, I really dont like the game, the way the mechanics work make the game feel broken to me.Fraser.J.A said:Either you have been amazingly lucky in your gaming life or you need to get down off that fucking bandwagon.
Well said! People bashing these newer games they didn't like because it's 'cool' to do so are irritating. From an objective standpoint, these games WORK. You put the game in the tray, and they work. Subjective quibbles aside, there is no way that you can honestly think these are worse than games that were simply impossible, or nearly impossible due to horrible broken controls and nigh-impossible tasks.Fraser.J.A said:Seriously? You're going to sit there with a straight face and tell us Halo 3 is the worst game you've played? Not the most overrated or the most disappointing but the absolute worst game that you have ever played? (Ok, "recently" for ColdStorage.)
Either you have been amazingly lucky in your gaming life or you need to get down off that fucking bandwagon.
Obviously a lot of people like Halo, but for those who don't like it, it's an average game: not apocalyptically bad, just overrated. Sure it has deficiencies - all games do. But no amount of muddy storytelling, repetitive Flood levels and "bloom turned up too bright" could put it within ten miles of games like Big Rig Racing, ET, Shaq Fu, Superman 64, Bomberman: Act Zero, Ninjabread Man, Spider-Man 3 or any movie-licensed game ever created (except Goldeneye). And maybe you've never played any of those games or any of the thousand other irredeemably broken, pointless, frustrating, insulting or unplayable titles out there, but if you insist Halo 3 is the worst game you've ever encountered then I'm calling you a liar and a sheep.
And now comes the part where you write me off as a Halo fanboy or say "I'm entitled to my opinion" because I'm refusing to let you call one of the most popular and highly-rated games of all time the worst game ever.
what are you saying? because a game is new and it works it means its great?, no, life doesn't work like that.51gunner said:Well said! People bashing these newer games they didn't like because it's 'cool' to do so are irritating. From an objective standpoint, these games WORK. You put the game in the tray, and they work.
It doesn't mean it's great, but it's better than a game that doesn't work. Have you NEVER played a game that was completely broken? If so I'll echo the guy whose post I quoted and say that you have been very, very lucky.ColdStorage said:what are you saying? because a game is new and it works it means its great?, no, life doesn't work like that.51gunner said:Well said! People bashing these newer games they didn't like because it's 'cool' to do so are irritating. From an objective standpoint, these games WORK. You put the game in the tray, and they work.
I have shadow of collosus that doesn't work, possibly owing to the DVD being fucked at the manufacturing process, I hear its a fucking amazing game though.51gunner said:It doesn't mean it's great, but it's better than a game that doesn't work. Have you NEVER played a game that was completely broken? If so I'll echo the guy whose post I quoted and say that you have been very, very lucky.ColdStorage said:what are you saying? because a game is new and it works it means its great?, no, life doesn't work like that.51gunner said:Well said! People bashing these newer games they didn't like because it's 'cool' to do so are irritating. From an objective standpoint, these games WORK. You put the game in the tray, and they work.
No. One thing newer games don't do is "WORK" (which you put in capital letters for some reason). The PS 1 and PS 2 platforms had literally thousands of games. Tell me just one game of theirs that needed a patch? Just one. Or just one with a game breaking bug.51gunner said:Well said! People bashing these newer games they didn't like because it's 'cool' to do so are irritating. From an objective standpoint, these games WORK. You put the game in the tray, and they work. Subjective quibbles aside, there is no way that you can honestly think these are worse than games that were simply impossible, or nearly impossible due to horrible broken controls and nigh-impossible tasks.
Games are getting better in some ways (length, graphics, sound, etc.) but I can understand what you mean and I agree.cuddly_tomato said:No. One thing newer games don't do is "WORK" (which you put in capital letters for some reason). The PS 1 and PS 2 platforms had literally thousands of games. Tell me just one game of theirs that needed a patch? Just one. Or just one with a game breaking bug.51gunner said:Well said! People bashing these newer games they didn't like because it's 'cool' to do so are irritating. From an objective standpoint, these games WORK. You put the game in the tray, and they work. Subjective quibbles aside, there is no way that you can honestly think these are worse than games that were simply impossible, or nearly impossible due to horrible broken controls and nigh-impossible tasks.
Now, out of the current crop of games, name me just one which hasn't had a patch.
Games are getting worse, not better.
The games was only made to cash in on the success of FF X so everybody should have known that it would be bad. It's still better than other FF games.jdnoth said:Final Fantasy X-2.
Crappy story, stupid dress level system thing, unlikeable characters designed purely to titillate the 13 year old hentai-loving weaboo demographic, and the most unbearable dialogue since... Well since Final Fantasy X now I think about it. God it was like watching an episode of Lucky Star.
Fraser.J.A said:PEOPLE WHO DISAGREE WITH ME ARE WRONG!!!1