MaxTheReaper said:Admittedly, the book is a bit of a slog, especially near the end (Galt needs shorter speeches). I don't necessarily take most of the philosphy to heart, but I do enjoy the somewhat different take on the concept of heroes and villians, especially in an age where the line between the two is often indistinct.oliveira8 said:That book wasn't significantly longer than most of the ones I've read, but it sure felt like it.Eclectic Dreck said:Atlas Shrugged - Ayn Rand
Yeah, I'd agree with you on that one.G1eet said:Ahh, I had forgotten about the antics of Pitt and Giordino. I haven't read the last couple books, because it seemed to me like they've been going down in quality since Atlantis Rising.stone0042 said:I'm going to go with the Dirk Pitt Series of novels by Clive Cussler, they have provided me with many an hour of entertainment and intrigue.
I just found the Hobbit much better, and much more believable. While LotR was a realy long and draw out process, the Hobbit was a nice, short, believable quest. In LotR, two every day peasents(Sam and Frodo) have to magicaly side step thousands of enemey forces, some paranormal(Black Riders), sneak across the know world, infiltrate the enemies own bastion, and then destroy the one thing that holds him in power. Possible? Yes. Probable? Next to none. I also found that alot of the characters in The Hobbit where much better. They questionned things more, the effects of thinsg like moral clearly wore down their descisions, and overal, there were no "God" characters except Gandalf, who wasn't even there half the time. On serval occasions the Dwarves simple desires screwed the team, and it was up to Bilbo, the only one with a bit of magic, to bail there sorry asses out. In LotR I found that some characters where too over done. Like at Cirith Ungol, when Sam actualy contemplates staying with Frodo's seemingly dead body compared to ending the war permanently. I know he loved him, but come on. But also just the writting style. While in the Hobbit descriptions where quick yet effective, I found that in LotR some passages just get realy bogged down in descriptions.Shapsters said:I don't understand what you mean.TheGreatCoolEnergy said:Dont get your hopes too high. I found the Hobbit destroyed the rest of the series by a long shot.Shapsters said:I am reading the Hobbit right now, and it is fantastic! After that I am going to read the whole LOTR trilogy and I am quite excited.
Leven Thumps series is probably my favorite series. But it could soon be LOTR.
Care to elaborate?
An excellent choice. I love that book. Still, my all-time favorite would have to be Eat the Rich by P.J. O'Rourke.Spacelord said:Guns, Germs and Steel. By Jared Diamond.
It's fucking epic. AND nonfiction.
I liked inkheart alot, but I just coudln't bring myself to finnish inkspell. Once they got into the book's realm, I just found it hard to follow and ultimately dull.Evil Raven665 said:My favorite book is Inkheart and my favorite series in the Inkheart trilogy(InkHeart, InkSpell, and InkDeath).
I absolutely love them.
Oh and just incase there are some of those people who have seen the movie, and not read the book.
The book is so much better then the movie.
I don't blame you. InkSpell was the worst of the three. Most boring I'd have to say. But if you can get past it InkDeath is so much better.TheGreatCoolEnergy said:I liked inkheart alot, but I just coudln't bring myself to finnish inkspell. Once they got into the book's realm, I just found it hard to follow and ultimately dull.Evil Raven665 said:My favorite book is Inkheart and my favorite series in the Inkheart trilogy(InkHeart, InkSpell, and InkDeath).
I absolutely love them.
Oh and just incase there are some of those people who have seen the movie, and not read the book.
The book is so much better then the movie.