What is your I.Q?
- Thread starter brodie21
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Grats, do they test useful knowledge or is it like E-penis viagra for the poorly endowed?brodie21 said:
(No personal offense to you, but having never been tested, and not seeing how you can really measure a persons intellect through simple questions and answers I often look at peoples' gloating about their IQ's as the equivalent of 12 year old kids nearing 13 and comparing their penis sizes to gratify their egos.)
(I'd also like to add that mines bigger than yours. ^^)
your life experiences and ability to learn freely often effect how smart you are.
(at least in my opinion)
online IQ tests are even more unrealistic than the ones you can take in real life.
(at least in my opinion)
online IQ tests are even more unrealistic than the ones you can take in real life.
It was a good 10 years ago so I doubt it is the same now:
154 on math and logic and 143 overall.
154 on math and logic and 143 overall.
172, but ironically enough, it just means I'm intelligent enough to know that the measure of raw intelligence is worthless without juxtaposition. I'd still be a moron without common sense or wisdom.
Just to add to the to everyone saying i.q tests are bs... they are...
the bbc did a national thingy a while back, i got 120 on that, did a random internet one and got 103 and i actually did the mensa one and got 155.
Really the only way to say if you are smart or stupid is, have you ever responded to a spam e-mail and given some random internets people your money? if so, you're a dumbass. If not, you're not a dumbass. And when it comes down to it, thats really the only two levels of intelligence that matter.
the bbc did a national thingy a while back, i got 120 on that, did a random internet one and got 103 and i actually did the mensa one and got 155.
Really the only way to say if you are smart or stupid is, have you ever responded to a spam e-mail and given some random internets people your money? if so, you're a dumbass. If not, you're not a dumbass. And when it comes down to it, thats really the only two levels of intelligence that matter.
136 yay! I even got some stupid certificate from the high I.Q. society or something like that. Makes for good tender, so I would recommend it. Otherwise, no one cares about I.Q. anymore since they realized that it has nothing to do with actual intelligence or with what you know. Most people don't even realize that the I.Q. test is supposed to measure your ability to learn, not how smart you are.
You have to understand that they all took it as children. Kids always score really high because their brains are working and growing as hard as they ever will. If they took the test now, they would most likely end up with an average score. I.Q. tests need to be taken regularly for the results to be applicable.poiumty said:
My school wanted me to take the Wechsler one when I was 17. My verbal result was at the top. My performance result wasn't like that; it might have been in the 130's but I don't remember it exactly. I've probably got the results somewhere.
Most of the people in this thread are probably mistaken or lying, and everyone should read Nomad's post.
Edit: I just asked my mother and she said I got 143 which equals 99.8th percentile overall. I just looked it up and that matches.
Most of the people in this thread are probably mistaken or lying, and everyone should read Nomad's post.
Edit: I just asked my mother and she said I got 143 which equals 99.8th percentile overall. I just looked it up and that matches.
True that! In school, the IQ tests existed out of like 60% math questions and I suck at math.Julianking93 said: