ive fired a few guns some pretty serious hardware and some like pea shooters but i live in the stab capitol of the world, more ppl are carrying knives here than they ever did guns.....including school kids which is just not on.
*puts on history buff hat*tharwen said:Sorry, I should have written 'battle', not 'conflict'. I was making a (perhaps overly pedantic) point about half a million people being a lot more than can easily fit onto one battlefield.SakSak said:Then you've never heard of the 30-years war.tharwen said:500000-man conflicts never existed, and we're nearly at a decade in Afghanistan anyway.SakSak said:The firepower that can be delivered is so devastating that decade-long conflicts of half-a-million men each going head to head on an open field are gone.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirty_Years%27_War
The first world war. Total KIA, MIA and WIA: almost 40 million. It hammered the point home that previous strategies and tactics were no longer functional, that the way war is waged would need to change in front of modern weaponry.
So do knives, so do baseball bats, so do chairs, so do fists. People kill, guns are a tool.Joe Matsuda said:they kill
as such "not awesome"
(I'm a pacifist)
Times change quickly. It was not illegal, or even against school policy to carry a knife when I went to school, well at least one with a blade less then 2" long. I carried a small folding knife with me the entire time I was in school. There was only a couple of stabbings as well, only one actually inside the school. In a school where we where allowed to carry a knife with over 4000 students, I think one in school stabbing makes for some pretty good numbers.GeneralDefiance said:ive fired a few guns some pretty serious hardware and some like pea shooters but i live in the stab capitol of the world, more ppl are carrying knives here than they ever did guns.....including school kids which is just not on.
So, to sum up, you trust criminals to just rob you and then leave you alone, and you refuse to use the threat of force to defend yourself even if you have that option, because you seem to find the possibility that you might have to deliver on that threat to be scarier than the prospect that they'll rob you, then go on to harm you anyway for no reason whatsoever. Incidentally, that happens a lot more than you'd think, but statistics are irrelevant to the individual -- the question is, are you willing to take the chance that the person trying to steal your money isn't also a raging psychopath? There have been several robbery cases in this country in which a burglar confronts a victim (often an elderly person) and demands valuables, the victim complies and offers no resistance, and the assailant beats them to death anyway.SakSak said:Or trying to rob the 40 bucks in your wallet, whereupon, frightened as you are, you pull a gun and put lives on the line instead of giving those 40 bucks away.However unfortunate that may be, I think we can agree that this is a more favorable outcome than allowing your assailant to continue on whatever course of action caused you to draw your weapon on them in the first place, such as trying to kill you, for instance...
Or, you know, trying running.
Now who's nitpicking? I said "force" in the sense that it's the only reasonable option available at that point. In the same way I might say "The squad of soldiers was forced to fall back in the face of the overwhelming enemy attack". Sure, they're not literally forced to retreat, that's not the only option open to them, because they could, say, just stay there and get crushed by the superior force or surrender and hope their captors treat them well, a choice that's right up your alley, I'm sure.SakSak said:Nobody forces you to shoot anyone. You could run away, you could accept getting robbed, you could try fighting back with some other methods.
Oh for god's sake, how many times do I have to say this? If someone is holding you up or has broken into your house, you have no way of knowing why they're there or what they plan to do, and by simply letting them do their thing unhindered, you're putting your life (and, potentially, those of others) in their hands. Sure, it's most likely by far that they're just there to steal stuff and will leave at the first sign of trouble, but what guarantee do you have that they won't violently attack you or other occupants of the house? Sure it's unlikely, but how comforting would that be if it happened to you and you failed to act to prevent it?SakSak said:But for say... your credit cards, PS3 and 42" HD-tv? Are they really worth it to put lives on the line?
If they want to kill you, what have you left to lose? If they want your money but nothing else, why would you pull out a gun?
That depends entirely on the circumstances. If I lived alone, I would do exactly that, because possessions would be all I have to lose and they're not worth the risk, but what if there are other people in the house who are all sleeping in various rooms? By simply going and hiding rather than confronting the intruder, you're leaving them defenseless. If that intruder just happens to stab one of your loved ones to death in their bed, what are you going to say? "I was afraid to risk my own neck so I hid"?[/quote]SakSak said:If you almost certain that you're about to be robbed, you call the cops, lock the door to your bedroom and hunker down with that handgun. You don't go looking for a confrontation. Or do you value potentially taking a knife to your ribs over a few hundred bucks worth of electronics and jewellery, or more valuable but insured goods?
Of course, because every occupant of a house sleeps in the same room, right? Do you seriously think that -- in a household of more than a few people -- it's possible to go around to the various bedrooms, wake the occupants and alert them to the danger, and round them all up into a single room that you can easily guard, all without making noise to alert or otherwise encountering the intruder who's already in the building? And all as part of a convoluted strategy to avoid confronting the intruder (even potentially throwing away a good opportunity to catch them off-guard) so that the "professionals" can handle it for you an indeterminable amount of time later?SakSak said:Or you can avoid the situation entirely by backing out once you confirm the burglar is there, lock down in a room with the rest of the people in the house and...
I wasn't suggesting that a gun turns a paraplegic into a warrior. The fact remains that a handgun can be used effectively (if the situation requires it) by people for whom martial arts and many melee weapons would be next to useless. The elderly, the sick, or the pregnant, for instance.SakSak said:That is why I think self-defence courses ought to be offered more widely.Martial arts? Too bad if you're disabled, or injured, or simply haven't trained enough and lack the ability to use such methods effectively.
Disabled? Oh right mr. burglar, please what while I dig out my gun and make plenty of sound and noise jumping into my wheelchair from my bed and come after you. Oh right, mr. thief, please hold and do not step behind me while I dig out my gun instead of my wallet and please do not easily stab me for trying to kill you.
Injured? Please stay still mr. bad-person, while I aim with a single hand since my other one is broken. Please do not be disturbed by my hobbling on sticks and one leg while I try to deter you with a gun. Or please come into my bedroom where I cannot leave my bed without assistance.
Its a pet peeve of mine when guns fire bullets. =]Eggsnham said:Being on the Escapist, I've noticed that there are a lot of gun nuts, and I suppose I can call myself an amateur gun nut as well. So I'm going to ask what makes guns so appealing (or not appealing) to you?
Please note that I'm not trying to start a flame war or offend anyone. I don't condone violence and I am a pacifist myself.
Anyhoo, what makes me so fond of our explosive friends is the fact that modern firearms are kind of a mark of how far we've come, to be able to create a tool that can efficiently blast metal and explosive cartridges at super speeds and with ridiculous power, I just find it very interesting I suppose. It also doesn't hurt that guns often times look bad-ass.
Fair enough on the first point.KarumaK said:Guns are made to kill anything that lives, that's why they come in various sizes.Woodsey said:Guns are made to kill people.
I fail to find anything awesome in that.
I fail to find anything not awesome in that.
Interesting article you have linked to. Ignoring the unlucky lad who ran across a road and was hit by a car (I am happy to debate the merits of road safety and checking a street before you cross it with you on a separate road safety forum if you wish), that article talks about a confrontation between 3 males and another 4 young males, where someone got punched and ended up in hospital.MattyDienhoff said:Running away didn't work out so well for this guy [http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/02/28/2832330.htm].