Most smart people were bullied by less intellectually endowed and more physically endowed people in school. They probably tried to work things out at first, and wanted to be friends. Unfortunately, these attempts probably resulted in failure. Eventually, and they spent more and more years with stupids, those who were called nerds eventually decided that morality and compassion was the cause of all their woes, and that they wre being picked on by nothing but large cretins. Many would probably join martial arts to make sure their superiority was physical as well as mental, and realised that bieng skinney made their muscles grow faster than those of fat people. Eventually, as they truly rse as human beings, they would realise the truth of the world: government is a creation. Laws and rules are a creation. The natural world is the only truth. Do not harm others, walk away, tell the teacher, these simply burden those who are compassionate and put them at the mercy of those who aren't. You may call it elitist, but it's really just people who were beaten without mercy as children, are too manly to be hurt, and have simply stepped on top of their oppressors.The Infamous Scamola said:
Words like elitist are also creations, ones which are given meaning by humans who cannot understand everything to help them understand what little they can of the world. Some people are more significant than others. If you want to rail against those who consider others inferior, you must rail against hundreds of millions of years of nature and the world itself. If everyone is equal, why are some talented to be leaders? To be great scientists? To be driven enough to be an Olympian? By calling everyone equal you are effectively belittling all those who have overcome others. If two people compete in a marathon, both of whom have trained their entire lives to be marathon runners, and one beats the other by 100 m, they simply are not equal. The very basis of life is to try to become better than others. This is why there is greed, war, and the desire to make others suffer. Calling people elitist is accusing them of being too in tune with reality, effectively, too smart.
I went to an all boys school, and there were no such things as believing everyone to be equal. People were mocked for not being good at sports. They were mocked for not being good at academics. They were complimented and spoke of in awe and respect when they were exceptional at something, or did something extracurricular, like running when you didn't have too. This is how things move forward. Not by creating an ideal world in your head and then assuming it already exists. If you want respect, you have to earn it. The individual who started this thread clearly does not have respect for the people he wants removed. Neither do I. From the racists I've met, they aren't against immigration (politics is a very distant thing to them) but they do get jobs. Otherwise they will end up getting barely any money in a dead end job. So they do it because they also have contempt for stupid people. There was a sentiment that looked down on those who didn't do well in academics. There was a sentiment to look down on those who hadn't had sex yet (it was a 7-12 school) if they were in Senior high (10-12). If you would really get offended by that, I honestly consider you a sissy. I'm sorry, but this "elitist" word is ridiculous. When people screw themselves over, it's not the responsibility of those around them to help them up. That produces a weak society in which everyone looks to everyone else for help. You know what happens to people who don't do well enough where I live? They live on the street. And my schoolmates volunteered to go the Mustard Seed one day to feed them all at the expense of my school (for teh food).
Most. Ungrateful. Bastards. Ever.
Apparently some big guy said of the bagel he was being given, free of charge, "this couldn't feed my little toe." And it wasn't just him, it was pretty much everyone who was not polite at all. One person tried to take more chocolates than than was allowed, and a school volunteer had to wrestle with him to keep him from taking the whole thing. Now, I don't expect people to bow a couple times and walk away without turning their backs and all that, but there was a HUGE sense of entitlement. Having food prepared and served to them by private donations and volunteers was their right. And I heard someone say they had asked a homeless guy why he didn't go to post-secondary. The response? "The government's supposed to pay for that." The reality of failure is ending up on the street. I see ads saying say "homeless by chance, not by choice." There's pictures of sad but dignified old men in front of computers trying to become educated so they can get a job. That's probably the case for a number of them, but the reality is that many just expect the government to do everything for them. They probably blame the government for being homeless.
If you think everyone is equal you remind me of those hippies who are against the seal hunt because it's "cruel." The world is cruel. The longer you hide in a world where you pretend it isn't the more cruel it will be when the world forces reality upon your eyes. And really, there's just to many seals, so some need to die so the species may continue. At least until global warming completly wipes them out.
And because global warming, reality is already coming. The differences between people, geographic, physical, mental, are about to be become very apparent. If greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise as they have been, by 2-3% each year; by 2100, it will be 6.4 degrees celcius warmer than it was... since some point in time, maybe 2004 when they made their first report. The ice caps will all melt, diseases may be unleashed from them, the rainforest will burn, fresh water will need to come from rain, and methane hydrate will be released destroying the ozone layer and resulting in only a few humans being able to survive at the poles, if they can find food and water. However, even the most dire predictions by the IPCC have been shown to be too conservative in the just the years after 2004. Most of the stupid's the maker of this thread was talking about probably don't believe that CO2 can effect the climate that much, or that it's a natural cycle, or maybe the world isn't even warming at all, or something to that effect. In any case, it's all going to be alright. Anyone who says differently is a fearmonger. They probably think this because they know it will spell their end. People will have little patience for the weak when there are not enough resources to go around. You may not think that people are different in every single way, but the earth does. God (if you believe) does. People are ultimately animals. We have the biggest brains, giving us the greatest possibility for diversity, but we are effectively just like the animals in Animal Farm.
I have no qualms with destroying those who are below and have no intention of improving themselvesif they are going to destroy the world. It repulses me that so many get to freely suck resources while more worthy people in the third world suffer. And as the maker of this thread said, they usually are racist. I hate racists.
