What they should do for AC3

[EightGaugeHippo]

As long as the serise eventually goes to either WWI or WWII or both Im not arsed.

 

[Daedalus1942]

They need to make it less linear, give us side missions instead of go here, then there, then assassination, then here.

umm... yeah what the hell? If anything this installment has managed the sidemission concept the best out of the lot. I have no idea what you are banging on about...
-Tabs<3-

 

[Daedalus1942]

I won't even consider giving it a try until Ubisoft dumps that atrocious DRM they use. I refuse to support such DRM in any way. I won't even support the notion that the game so 'protected' is even any good.

What DRM? I've been playing offline on ps3 for a week now. Not sure what you're referring to...

 

[omega 616]

They need to make it less linear, give us side missions instead of go here, then there, then assassination, then here.

I am constantly thinking, "right, I will do that then that ... No, I want to do that first, then the other thing ... No, I, ARGH! Too many choices!"

Although I will have to go back and do about 50% of the missions, keep failing the second objective.

I have no idea were I am in terms of % complete but I have 4/6 romlous (?) keys. (you know the dog dudes)

 

[Onyx Oblivion]

Improve the damn combat that is my biggest problem with the game...<.<

This is all they need to do, seriously.

But Brotherhood's guard-breaking kick and chain-kills made the combat buttery smooth. I don't even use counter anymore!

OT:

As long as it's not totally set in 2012, I'm happy. I like the 2012 storyline WAAAAAY better than the Animus stuff.

I suggest feudal Japan.

NINJA ASSASSIN!

 

[slipknot4]

What we need is Assassins Creed, in Soviet Russia. Think about it...

 

[Woodsey]

"- more assassination techniques as well, the ability to assassinate somebody while in a busy crowd would be good, as would things like "deniable" assassinations, throwing people off bridges or towers, rather than just stabbing them."

You've been able to throw people off of things since the first game.

Anyway, I'd like to see the Brotherhood feature advanced - it feels great to stand back, call in someone and have no one suspect you at all, and even though it's basically a simple spreadsheet you do feel as if you're looking after all these assassins.

Whilst they're obviously not going to go with Desmond for the entire game, the split needs to be way more 50-50, because the modern times were interesting before, but after Brotherhood's ending... I NEED MOAR.

A good way to handle it would be to show Desmond actually controlling the Bleeding Effect, so that he can dive into his memories without the Animus. If that happens at scripted story moments then I think the split is easier to achieve.

 

[Greyhamster]

They should introduce difficulty settings. I want harder combat...

 

[Sonicron]

I want the following:

- More focus on the 2012 storyline. I actually like Desmond and his team, and I want to see a conclusion for their story arc at some point before my hair starts turning grey.
- Get rid of Brotherhood's goddamn shop quests, or failing that, at least don't make critical loot drops completely random.
- If the brotherhood is to remain as a gameplay mechanic, give us more options for using them than 'kill those dudes' and 'riddle those dudes with arrows'.
- If you're going to go for secondary objectives that are difficult to achieve, at least split the mission in some places. Especially with stuff like the tank mission. Screw you for that tank mission, Ubisoft.
- Do NOT use WW2 as a setting. Just don't. No matter the angle, the setting has been trampled, raped, buried, exhumed, raped again and been left to decompose in a roadside ditch.

 

[Ironic Pirate]

They need to make it less linear, give us side missions instead of go here, then there, then assassination, then here.

Lol in terms of side missions its one of the best games ive ever played. What could be improved is rewards for doing the 1000 side missions avaible.

Real side missions Brotherhood's side missions were just assassinate this other guy. Can't they add like a deliever this bag of gold before the people kill the hostage.

You're an assassin, not a delivery boy. So no, they can't.

In AC1 some missions had you gathering flags, were you a capture the flag expert and assassin in that one?

But those were petrifyingly dull and horribly done!

 

[Daedalus1942]

What DRM? I've been playing offline on ps3 for a week now. Not sure what you're referring to...

I only play on PC. The PC version has the most atrocious DRM ever concocted. You have to maintain a constant connection to Ubi's servers to play, and if you lose that connection you lose progress and are booted to the game's main menu.


In single player.


Hell. No.


I'm 100% for banning all DRM from ever existing. There's no way in hell I'm going to support such a draconian scheme. I sure as hell ain't going to support it by spending 60 bucks I can't come up with easily on a game I might not like.

okay... but unless i'm mistaken Ac Brotherhood hasn't come out on pc yet, so you have nothing to whinge about just yet. I know ubi has online drm on pc, but really for Assassin's Creed, you need to play it on ps3. There's no substitute.
They might even change it for the new one on pc. don't know.
-Tabs<3-

 

[Daedalus1942]

They should introduce difficulty settings. I want harder combat...

They did that... the defending the assassin's castle without losing any hp mission (for 100% synch) took me like 12 tries.
-Tabs<3-

 

[Vibhor]

They should improve the stealth aspect by...IDK making it thief like?
They have enough fantasy material to make up a piece of equipment that detects the light emitted
They should add indoor missions,The ones in which you have to go into a house to kill some b-tard.They could always make all of the houses accessible as hiding spots.
Also the ability to wear the clothes of the kill so that you could fool the guards.
I still am wonder why the hell no guard attacks anyone with a white cape and hood.Aren't previous assassinations enough of a clue that those clothes are of an assassin?
And a more responsive combat system,I mean its all fluent and stuff but you still could win a fight easily with spamming counter.
How about the one that Arkham asylum did?
It was exactly like AC but you simply could not win by spamming counter

 

[Daedalus1942]

but really for Assassin's Creed, you need to play it on ps3. There's no substitute.
-Tabs<3-

Unless the PS3 is on your tab that just isn't an option. Affording a PC that could game was hard enough and I had to garbage pick half of it. Other half is used relics from the glory days of Socket 939.



Eventually I will get around to buying a used PS3 to play GT5, but the only reason I'll do that is because GT5 isn't available for PC.

To buy a computer that will run AC:Brotherhood at a decent speed and quality, would cost roughly about the same price as the ps3 is today, in fact... probably a little dearer, so I don't see what your gripe's about.
-Tabs<3-

 

[ryanxm]

i want them to end this! this game series is AMAZING but it NEEDS to die now! god i hope it does not turn into a series like mario (seriously we DO NOT need more of those damn games!)

 

[lilmizzazle]

The only thing i can think of that needs improvement, is more variable use of the brotherhood, more fluid combat (i love the combat, but i often see ezio making rather unnatrual moves, also i am referring to combat running like in Arkham Asylum), more counter attack moves, enemies beeing more aggressive (i hate standing around waiting for them to attack and a little more variety and harder assassination missions. Also it would be great to see more of actual historical characters in the game.

I really love the game and i would rate it a 10/10, but if something could be improved it would be as stated above.