Yeah, I am defending the Star Wars 'Prequels'.SwmnNE1 said:OH HELL NO.
You are not defending the Episodes 1-3
All 6 have terrible acting and terrible stories. All of them.
But why rage against the newest ones?
They were written first. Lucas wrote them all, in order, a long time ago. The studios only wanted to make 4, 5, and 6. And the original 3 were released to terrible reviews. But they became popular, because they are fun movies.
I enjoy Episodes 1, 2, and 3.
I enjoy 4, 5, and 6.
They all have terrible acting, annoying characters (Seriously, Luke sometimes just makes me want to punch somebody. "But I was going to goto Tashi's station to pick up some power converters! WAH! Biggs is right! I'll never get out of here! WAAH! I'm ready to be a Jedi! WAAH!"), and a pretty poor story. But they are fun! It's a grand adventure!
They are all corny films! Look at Temple of Doom, for Pete's sake, with Willy Scott and even Short Round! Totally corny characters, with corny lines, throughout the entire film. Everyone has corny lines! It's a corn-fest! That's because Indy is, again, a hark back to the old-school all-American heroes from the radio dramas and comic books. Over the top action, corny dialog, impossible stories and adventures. That's the epitome of Indy.Nazulu said:No it was just a really bad made film that was so corny I just couldn't, oh it was just bad! Saying everyone making criticism is on the nostalgia train is as bad as me saying that you would except anything.
If you didn't like number 4 because it was 'corny', but you enjoyed 1, 2, and 3, then you're either blinded by nostalgia, or you never really 'got' Indy in the first place.