...sasquatch99 said:it says he killed it because he was bored of pet ownership. he could have taken it to a dog pound or something.
That's along the same logic-line as "I'm sick of being a parent, lemme eat my kids."
Seriously. What the hell.
...sasquatch99 said:it says he killed it because he was bored of pet ownership. he could have taken it to a dog pound or something.
I mean really.. Just give the mutt to a friend or something.rainman2203 said:Well usually one can apply the "Well it's cute, so we can't eat it!" argument, but that doesn't really apply to pit bulls. While I agree that they are a dangerous breed and hold some allure to low-income white people, eating them hardly seems the logical option.
Humane actions? The dude got bored of his pet, roasted it, and then fucking ate it. That doesn't seem humane to me, even if it was a pitbull.Kajin said:sasquatch99 said:yes...very much so.MaxTheReaper said:I've known plenty of dogs who were much more interesting than the majority of people I've met.
He didn't do anything wrong, but he's still a dick.
Just 'cause.Really? It's wrong to eat animals? I didn't know we had PETA members here on the escapist, I might very well need to stop coming here if that's the case.xmetatr0nx said:Well it falls under cruelty to animals, its not like he was in an emergency situation where he needed food. He will probably get a slap on the wrist, its kind of weird mind you. I guess it wouldnt be so strange if we farmed pitt bulls for food like chickens or cows, but since we dont.
Joke aside, it's only wrong because you think it's wrong, and no it most certainly does NOT fall under cruelty to animals. If he killed it quickly and with as little pain as possible, he did absolutely nothing wrong.
I for one applaud this man for his humane actions. Most people would have abandoned the animal, condemning it to the suffering and abuse that comes along with trying to survive in our society without an owner. He did the right thing by choosing to end the suffering before it could start by instead choosing to kill the animal off quickly.
That's the exact same way they treat chickens in the US.pipboy2009 said:Fundamentally speaking there's nothing wrong with eating dog. It's just that in most countries where dogs are eaten regularly, the dogs are treated like shit in tiny little cages, and electrocuted to death. Not pretty.
So were over half the dog breeds out there, and people don't have half as much hatred for them.JimmyBassatti said:It's a Pit bull; they deserve it. Pit bulls were animals bred to fight, and are animals that deserve to be killed. Pit bulls are far from nice dogs.MaxTheReaper said:Har har har, so funny.Kajin said:Really? It's wrong to eat animals? I didn't know we had PETA members here on the escapist, I might very well need to stop coming here if that's the case.
No, it's not wrong to eat animals - I'm a carnivore, as a matter of fact.
I just said he's a dick for killing his pet - there's plenty of ways to get food without doing so.
OT: If he did it quick and painless, I see nothing wrong. If it was dragged out, and very painful for the dog, well then, that's wrong.
what he saidMaxTheReaper said:I've known plenty of dogs who were much more interesting than the majority of people I've met.
He didn't do anything wrong, but he's still a dick.
Just 'cause.