Or, given it is a sentiment that has been repeatedly expressed throughout modern history by innumerable men and even many women, then maybe it is a "most (not all) the women problem".TheLaughingMagician said:KissingSunlight said:snipHey guys, crazy thought but maybe the reason you have trouble understanding what women like is a you problem and not an "all the women" problem.infohippie said:snip.
...I'll be blunt, that's not a women-exclusive problem. Getting men to admit to what they like is like getting blood from a stone. My god, the stories I could tell - it once took three days to get an old boyfriend to admit he liked flowers! Three days, for flowers! You're already Gay, dammit, it's not like admitting to liking flowers is going to make you gayer!KissingSunlight said:I haven't looked to see what gender the people who have been responding. It never occurred to me to do that. So, I'll walk that last statement back a little. Let me just say, I wish women would be less quick to label a guy "creepy" just because she doesn't find him attractive.Wrex Brogan said:...you know, I'm a gay man, so probably not the best at this but... shouldn't straight guys know that romance movies are... fiction? As in, not realistic representations of reality? A woman swooning over a romance story is about as accurate a representation of what they find romantic as me shouting 'RIP THEM IN HALF!' at a wrestling match is in regards to my approach to real-world violence. And given I'm a pacifist (yes I know I said I'd throw someone out of a window above, but that's just my shitty kind of humour)... yeah.
Just saying, if a man is confused over a womans reaction to a romantic movie... it feels like that's on him, not her.
As to your question of whether women should stop public shaming for men being creepy - I'll be honest, that doesn't feel like a question you should ask when a majority of your responders have been men. 'Should women stop doing the thing???' directed at a bunch of men is never a good path to take, trust me on that.
Women aren't very straight-forward when it comes to telling men what they like. So, men usually try to pick up clues to what they do like. Some of them try to find clues from romantic movies. If a woman talks about a certain scene, a man might take this as a clue that this would be something she would like in real life. Results may vary. Depending how well the man knows the woman.
It's to be expected when one is trying to lump every woman as one. There is no magic formula that works on most women because all people are different. There is no strict gender divide when it comes to who likes what. The best one can get is narrowing down by personality type. But folks never do that when they ask what "women" like or want.TheLaughingMagician said:KissingSunlight said:snipHey guys, crazy thought but maybe the reason you have trouble understanding what women like is a you problem and not an "all the women" problem.infohippie said:snip.
That is pretty true, actually. Both men and women are pretty shit at letting partners or prospective partners know what they like. Women are more visible in this respect because even in the present day it is still largely men who are expected to make the romantic gestures and it is up to the women to accept, but it's still a problem of both genders.Wrex Brogan said:...I'll be blunt, that's not a women-exclusive problem. Getting men to admit to what they like is like getting blood from a stone. My god, the stories I could tell - it once took three days to get an old boyfriend to admit he liked flowers! Three days, for flowers! You're already Gay, dammit, it's not like admitting to liking flowers is going to make you gayer!
American Fox said:Creepy is using a steel dildo on someone. A romantic will do the same thing, but be wearing a Bugs Bunny costume at the same time.
There were people in the thread saying the thing that mattered about the gesture was how attractive the person doing it was. That is not so. And you never know, some people might be into getting their laundry sniffed. Which would make it consensual and okay and I guess a somewhat romantic gesture if that's what you're into.Stewie Plisken said:This example doesn't prove your point, Phasmal. There is absolutely no context in which sniffing one's laundry basket could be interpreted as romantic. The question is when a gesture that is intended as romantic would come off as creepy.Phasmal said:![]()
Context and reciprocity. That's literally it. It has nothing to do with attractiveness, those who say it does aren't spilling the hard truths they think they are, they're just misinterpreting situations. For instance, I'd bang Chris Evans like a screen door in a hurricane, but I'd still think it was weird if I found him face down in my laundry basket inhaling like a crack addict.
And I see the conversation has jumped from the standard 'hot guys can do whatever they want' to 'women won't tell us what they want'. You guys could try to be a little less predictable.infohippie said:That's the understatement of the century. Rather than "not straightforward", I'd say "verging on deliberately duplicitous".KissingSunlight said:Women aren't very straight-forward when it comes to telling men what they like.
Hello, Mr. George Carlin. However, this is creepy vs romantic, not crazy vs maniac.American Fox said:Creepy is using a steel dildo on someone. A romantic will do the same thing, but be wearing a Bugs Bunny costume at the same time.
Haha, well, you seem to also have missed the distinction I was drawing (unless you think suddenly cooking for a person you barely know fits within the definition of nornal-spectrum acts that I specified...) so I guess I got what I deserved.Wrex Brogan said:...see, I feel you may have missed both the joke and the hyperbolic example there with the dirty laundry. Ah well, shit happens.Dreiko said:I think there's misunderstanding. It is obvious someone breaking into your house to smell your dirty laundry is bizzare and weird, this isn't really what most often is described as creepy though, which is more normal, but in some way undesirable, courses of action.
It is this, secondary type of creepy thing that this topic regards. Not siniffing laundry, more like texting good morning to someone every day or making extra lunch and sharing it or similar such normal-spectrum things that can be considered "creepy" by someone.
And the secondary type of creepy is what Phasmal already addressed anyway - context and reciprocity matters. I text my partner good morning every day (when we're not around each other), but that's because we're both fine with doing that. Texting some rando 'good morning' every day when they don't want it though? Creepy. Making extra lunch and sharing it? Actually pretty nice. Making lunch and sharing it as a romantic gesture? Unless you're dating that person and both parties are comfortable with it, creepy.
Like... yeah, Context is everything, how the people respond is everything. That's literally it.
So what you are saying is that there is no such thing as romantic?sky14kemea said:Also for a curveball, it's creepy if you're expecting a reward or a certain outcome for yourself. It's romantic if you're doing it because you think they'd like it, and don't want anything in return.
Everyone, every single person alive on earth, does that. At the very least people doing "romantic" stuff want attention.TheLaughingMagician said:... You only do nice things if you expect something in return? Yeah that's a you problem dude.Strazdas said:So what you are saying is that there is no such thing as romantic?sky14kemea said:Also for a curveball, it's creepy if you're expecting a reward or a certain outcome for yourself. It's romantic if you're doing it because you think they'd like it, and don't want anything in return.