What's the worst injury you've inflicted on someone else?

Recommended Videos

Sovvolf

New member
Mar 23, 2009
2,341
0
0
Jedoro said:
Sovvolf said:
Jedoro said:
People have retarded views on child abuse. My point was if the kid was intent on kicking my ass for some reason, I would stop them.
Quickly losing faith in the human race, I think you have a retarded veiw on child abuse, Kicking the shit out of children = child abuse,

Ive got a neice and if she steps to far out of line and misbehaves after being told to stop, she gets a slap on the hand and sent to the naughty corner until she behaves, thats not child abuse, thats just disipline, But if I went and started to leather the ever loving shit out of her or start backhanding her then that would be child abuse, see the difference??

If a kid was truly trying to hurt you, then you dont beat the fuck out of them, you restrain them and try to calm them down while they there tantrum finishes.
The phrase "stop them" does not imply beating the fuck out of them. Handcuffs, or grabbing their arms and holding them in the air are effective ways of stopping them as well.

Maybe you should look at what it says and not what you want it to say.
Haaa but before then you stated that if a kid attacked you or hit you in the nuts that you would backhand them and make them cry, that to me implies beating the fuck out of them.
 

Jedoro

New member
Jun 28, 2009
5,393
0
0
Sovvolf said:
Jedoro said:
Sovvolf said:
Jedoro said:
People have retarded views on child abuse. My point was if the kid was intent on kicking my ass for some reason, I would stop them.
Quickly losing faith in the human race, I think you have a retarded veiw on child abuse, Kicking the shit out of children = child abuse,

Ive got a neice and if she steps to far out of line and misbehaves after being told to stop, she gets a slap on the hand and sent to the naughty corner until she behaves, thats not child abuse, thats just disipline, But if I went and started to leather the ever loving shit out of her or start backhanding her then that would be child abuse, see the difference??

If a kid was truly trying to hurt you, then you dont beat the fuck out of them, you restrain them and try to calm them down while they there tantrum finishes.
The phrase "stop them" does not imply beating the fuck out of them. Handcuffs, or grabbing their arms and holding them in the air are effective ways of stopping them as well.

Maybe you should look at what it says and not what you want it to say.
Haaa but before then you stated that if a kid attacked you or hit you in the nuts that you would backhand them and make them cry, that to me implies beating the fuck out of them.
It may imply that to you, but to me it is directly stating that I would use the necessary amount of force, and nothing more, to get them to stop attacking me immediately. Being doubled over from a painful kick to the groin, not too much would be going through my head other than "neutralize threat." Beating the fuck out of them would involve a backhand, knocking them to the ground, and a curb stomp to the stomach.
 

Anth

New member
Dec 31, 2008
11
0
0
I convinced my best friend in 6th grade to stab himself in the eye with a stick. The doctors said he was lucky he didn't permanently damage his eye.
 

gamegirl244

New member
Jun 10, 2009
4
0
0
XD I know what mine was; my cousin and I were in the backyard sword-fighting with a pair of garden sticks. I swung a bit too high and slashed him along the throat. He had a scar on his throat for a good month or so.

For the whole time, our joke was "How'd you get that scar?" "Oh, my cousin almost killed me with a stick."
 

Sovvolf

New member
Mar 23, 2009
2,341
0
0
Jedoro said:
Sovvolf said:
Jedoro said:
Sovvolf said:
Jedoro said:
People have retarded views on child abuse. My point was if the kid was intent on kicking my ass for some reason, I would stop them.
Quickly losing faith in the human race, I think you have a retarded veiw on child abuse, Kicking the shit out of children = child abuse,

Ive got a neice and if she steps to far out of line and misbehaves after being told to stop, she gets a slap on the hand and sent to the naughty corner until she behaves, thats not child abuse, thats just disipline, But if I went and started to leather the ever loving shit out of her or start backhanding her then that would be child abuse, see the difference??

If a kid was truly trying to hurt you, then you dont beat the fuck out of them, you restrain them and try to calm them down while they there tantrum finishes.
The phrase "stop them" does not imply beating the fuck out of them. Handcuffs, or grabbing their arms and holding them in the air are effective ways of stopping them as well.

Maybe you should look at what it says and not what you want it to say.
Haaa but before then you stated that if a kid attacked you or hit you in the nuts that you would backhand them and make them cry, that to me implies beating the fuck out of them.
It may imply that to you, but to me it is directly stating that I would use the necessary amount of force, and nothing more, to get them to stop attacking me immediately. Being doubled over from a painful kick to the groin, not too much would be going through my head other than "neutralize threat." Beating the fuck out of them would involve a backhand, knocking them to the ground, and a curb stomp to the stomach.
Neutralizing the threat? its a kid, your saying that backhanding a child is the necessary amount of force to stop him attacking you?? how old are you??, if not too much would be going through your head other then Neautralize the there (That happens to be a child) then you clearly should not be having children, If you do have a child and you back hand him and knock all his teeth out, is that what your going to explain to child services, "He kicked me in the balls so I neautralized the threat"?.
 

Jedoro

New member
Jun 28, 2009
5,393
0
0
Sovvolf said:
Jedoro said:
Sovvolf said:
Jedoro said:
Sovvolf said:
Jedoro said:
People have retarded views on child abuse. My point was if the kid was intent on kicking my ass for some reason, I would stop them.
Quickly losing faith in the human race, I think you have a retarded veiw on child abuse, Kicking the shit out of children = child abuse,

Ive got a neice and if she steps to far out of line and misbehaves after being told to stop, she gets a slap on the hand and sent to the naughty corner until she behaves, thats not child abuse, thats just disipline, But if I went and started to leather the ever loving shit out of her or start backhanding her then that would be child abuse, see the difference??

If a kid was truly trying to hurt you, then you dont beat the fuck out of them, you restrain them and try to calm them down while they there tantrum finishes.
The phrase "stop them" does not imply beating the fuck out of them. Handcuffs, or grabbing their arms and holding them in the air are effective ways of stopping them as well.

Maybe you should look at what it says and not what you want it to say.
Haaa but before then you stated that if a kid attacked you or hit you in the nuts that you would backhand them and make them cry, that to me implies beating the fuck out of them.
It may imply that to you, but to me it is directly stating that I would use the necessary amount of force, and nothing more, to get them to stop attacking me immediately. Being doubled over from a painful kick to the groin, not too much would be going through my head other than "neutralize threat." Beating the fuck out of them would involve a backhand, knocking them to the ground, and a curb stomp to the stomach.
Neutralizing the threat? its a kid, your saying that backhanding a child is the necessary amount of force to stop him attacking you?? how old are you??, if not too much would be going through your head other then Neautralize the there (That happens to be a child) then you clearly should not be having children, If you do have a child and you back hand him and knock all his teeth out, is that what your going to explain to child services, "He kicked me in the balls so I neautralized the threat"?.
It's not just the fact that it's attacking me, it's the fact that he has inflicted a great deal of pain, and with my face at its level now, it is in a perfect position to inflict a lot more. I'm 18, by the way.

Human instinct, after the application of adrenaline, is "fight or flight." Given that I have taken measures to rule out the "flight" option, what else is left? Exactly. I don't run, I don't give up, I don't take crap from anyone laying down. Anyone.

My future children will know better than to be little brats. I will raise them better than that. But by saying that I would knock their teeth out, you're underestimating the strength of the human dental system and my sense of judgment when applying force, and greatly overestimating my strength. I don't have that much muscle on me, and I know better than to hit a kid with a full-powered swing, anyways. This is where the term "escalating force" applies. Never go all out in any kind of attack at first, ever.

Grammar Nazi Time!
Could you please put a little more effort into typing your posts? It literally takes me a few minutes just to comprehend what you're saying. Misspelling words that I used, capitalizing after a comma, improper grammar? Really?

I mean, how old are you?
 

Sovvolf

New member
Mar 23, 2009
2,341
0
0
Jedoro said:
Sovvolf said:
Jedoro said:
Sovvolf said:
Jedoro said:
Sovvolf said:
Jedoro said:
People have retarded views on child abuse. My point was if the kid was intent on kicking my ass for some reason, I would stop them.
Quickly losing faith in the human race, I think you have a retarded veiw on child abuse, Kicking the shit out of children = child abuse,

Ive got a neice and if she steps to far out of line and misbehaves after being told to stop, she gets a slap on the hand and sent to the naughty corner until she behaves, thats not child abuse, thats just disipline, But if I went and started to leather the ever loving shit out of her or start backhanding her then that would be child abuse, see the difference??

If a kid was truly trying to hurt you, then you dont beat the fuck out of them, you restrain them and try to calm them down while they there tantrum finishes.
The phrase "stop them" does not imply beating the fuck out of them. Handcuffs, or grabbing their arms and holding them in the air are effective ways of stopping them as well.

Maybe you should look at what it says and not what you want it to say.
Haaa but before then you stated that if a kid attacked you or hit you in the nuts that you would backhand them and make them cry, that to me implies beating the fuck out of them.
It may imply that to you, but to me it is directly stating that I would use the necessary amount of force, and nothing more, to get them to stop attacking me immediately. Being doubled over from a painful kick to the groin, not too much would be going through my head other than "neutralize threat." Beating the fuck out of them would involve a backhand, knocking them to the ground, and a curb stomp to the stomach.
Neutralizing the threat? its a kid, your saying that backhanding a child is the necessary amount of force to stop him attacking you?? how old are you??, if not too much would be going through your head other then Neautralize the there (That happens to be a child) then you clearly should not be having children, If you do have a child and you back hand him and knock all his teeth out, is that what your going to explain to child services, "He kicked me in the balls so I neautralized the threat"?.
It's not just the fact that it's attacking me, it's the fact that he has inflicted a great deal of pain, and with my face at its level now, it is in a perfect position to inflict a lot more. I'm 18, by the way.

Human instinct, after the application of adrenaline, is "fight or flight." Given that I have taken measures to rule out the "flight" option, what else is left? Exactly. I don't run, I don't give up, I don't take crap from anyone laying down. Anyone.

My future children will know better than to be little brats. I will raise them better than that. But by saying that I would knock their teeth out, you're underestimating the strength of the human dental system and my sense of judgment when applying force, and greatly overestimating my strength. I don't have that much muscle on me, and I know better than to hit a kid with a full-powered swing, anyways. This is where the term "escalating force" applies. Never go all out in any kind of attack at first, ever.

Grammar Nazi Time!
Could you please put a little more effort into typing your posts? It literally takes me a few minutes just to comprehend what you're saying. Misspelling words that I used, capitalizing after a comma, improper grammar? Really?

I mean, how old are you?
I'm 18, I live at home with my parents and my two brothers, along with my brothers duaghter, who I take care of while he's at work.

"Grammar Nazi Time!
Could you please put a little more effort into typing your posts? It literally takes me a few minutes just to comprehend what you're saying. Misspelling words that I used, capitalizing after a comma, improper grammar? Really?"

I didnt spell out your words I copied and paste'd them, so there your spelling errors not mine, I have bad grammer but read your post again and you will realise that you have fallen victem to Murphrys Law (Look it up, Its not a misspell dont confuse it with Murphys laws), though what grammar as got to do with this subject I have no idea.

"Human instinct, after the application of adrenaline, is "fight or flight." Given that I have taken measures to rule out the "flight" option, what else is left? Exactly. I don't run, I don't give up, I don't take crap from anyone laying down. Anyone."

Stop talking shit please, were talking about a child here, not a full grown adult, your parental insticts should kick in and counter the fight or flight instict, you dont get the same adrenaline when a child attacks you that you do when a adult attacks you mainly becuase you know by instict that the child is of no real threat to you. This can be seen in the wildlife kindom too.

"It's not just the fact that it's attacking me, it's the fact that he has inflicted a great deal of pain, and with my face at its level now, it is in a perfect position to inflict a lot more."

This is a child were talking about, please get that into your head, a child, your deeply overestimating the damage a child can do, your given the same attribute to the child that are of an adult, the damage a child will do to you by kicking you in the balls isnt going to be enough to bring a full grown man to his knees.

"I'm 18, by the way."

Then theres no excuse, you should easily be able to overpower a child without resulting to phyical damage, mere restraints would do.
 

Stryc9

Elite Member
Nov 12, 2008
1,294
0
41
There was this hillbilly I went to school with and for whatever reason ended up hanging out with for a while until I realized what a moron he was. He was always doing stupid shit to prove how 'tough' he was. If I hadn't heard otherwise I would have considered myself responsible for his inability to reproduce considering all the times I either hit him in the nads or convinced him to do something painful to that area.
 

I Stomp on Kittens

Don't let go!
Nov 3, 2008
4,289
0
0
MaxTheReaper said:
Oh Jesus, this is going to make me look awful.

I broke some kid's wrists, I broke another kid's wrist, I smashed someone's head into a fusebox during a fight (I won,) I've knocked someone unconscious by kicking them in the head (he were taunting me. For an hour. I warned him,) I nearly strangled someone unconscious, (he was being bothersome,) and I've stabbed people with various objects of various sharpness (most of them deserved it.)

...This really isn't as bad as it looks.
It's worse, 'cause those are just the really bad ones...
o_O I thought that you would be one of those peacefull types. Well now we know not to make fun of you
 

Jedoro

New member
Jun 28, 2009
5,393
0
0
Sovvolf said:
I'm 18, I live at home with my parents and my two brothers, along with my brothers duaghter, who I take care of while he's at work.

"Grammar Nazi Time!
Could you please put a little more effort into typing your posts? It literally takes me a few minutes just to comprehend what you're saying. Misspelling words that I used, capitalizing after a comma, improper grammar? Really?"

I didnt spell out your words I copied and paste'd them, so there your spelling errors not mine, I have bad grammer but read your post again and you will realise that you have fallen victem to Murphrys Law (Look it up, Its not a misspell dont confuse it with Murphys laws), though what grammar as got to do with this subject I have no idea.

"Human instinct, after the application of adrenaline, is "fight or flight." Given that I have taken measures to rule out the "flight" option, what else is left? Exactly. I don't run, I don't give up, I don't take crap from anyone laying down. Anyone."

Stop talking shit please, were talking about a child here, not a full grown adult, your parental insticts should kick in and counter the fight or flight instict, you dont get the same adrenaline when a child attacks you that you do when a adult attacks you mainly becuase you know by instict that the child is of no real threat to you. This can be seen in the wildlife kindom too.

"It's not just the fact that it's attacking me, it's the fact that he has inflicted a great deal of pain, and with my face at its level now, it is in a perfect position to inflict a lot more."

This is a child were talking about, please get that into your head, a child, your deeply overestimating the damage a child can do, your given the same attribute to the child that are of an adult, the damage a child will do to you by kicking you in the balls isnt going to be enough to bring a full grown man to his knees.

"I'm 18, by the way."

Then theres no excuse, you should easily be able to overpower a child without resulting to phyical damage, mere restraints would do.
So... where exactly did I mess up? If you had copied my words, you wouldn't have "neutralized" spelled two different ways up there. You can't even spell "victim" right. Grammar is involved because I have a hard time telling what your sentences mean when they're a clusterfuck of words.

And I'm aware that the child isn't a threat, hence the one, underpowered backhand and not a full ass-beating. You're really not paying attention to what I say, are you? But if the child is running around kicking guys in the balls, it's clearly underdisciplined, and the smack would serve to teach it not to pick a fight it can't win.

Even parental instincts would dictate that a child who does something wrong needs to be punished. My point is not to "beat the shit out of the kid," I've said that multiple times but you don't seem to be getting it. One hit does not qualify as that. It was even another guy who said to beat the shit out of them, yet you're jumping down my throat when I even slightly disagreed with him.

As for overestimating its strength, you have any idea how little force it takes to really fuck up your eye, or at least hurt it a lot?

I make concession after concession, and you still think all I want to do is hit the kid as hard as I can just because it hit me. Please, actually read what I'm saying, don't assume I mean what I didn't say, and then reply.

You know what? There's no point arguing with you anymore. You're not paying attention anyways, so I'm done.
 

Sovvolf

New member
Mar 23, 2009
2,341
0
0
Jedoro said:
Sovvolf said:
I'm 18, I live at home with my parents and my two brothers, along with my brothers duaghter, who I take care of while he's at work.

"Grammar Nazi Time!
Could you please put a little more effort into typing your posts? It literally takes me a few minutes just to comprehend what you're saying. Misspelling words that I used, capitalizing after a comma, improper grammar? Really?"

I didnt spell out your words I copied and paste'd them, so there your spelling errors not mine, I have bad grammer but read your post again and you will realise that you have fallen victem to Murphrys Law (Look it up, Its not a misspell dont confuse it with Murphys laws), though what grammar as got to do with this subject I have no idea.

"Human instinct, after the application of adrenaline, is "fight or flight." Given that I have taken measures to rule out the "flight" option, what else is left? Exactly. I don't run, I don't give up, I don't take crap from anyone laying down. Anyone."

Stop talking shit please, were talking about a child here, not a full grown adult, your parental insticts should kick in and counter the fight or flight instict, you dont get the same adrenaline when a child attacks you that you do when a adult attacks you mainly becuase you know by instict that the child is of no real threat to you. This can be seen in the wildlife kindom too.

"It's not just the fact that it's attacking me, it's the fact that he has inflicted a great deal of pain, and with my face at its level now, it is in a perfect position to inflict a lot more."

This is a child were talking about, please get that into your head, a child, your deeply overestimating the damage a child can do, your given the same attribute to the child that are of an adult, the damage a child will do to you by kicking you in the balls isnt going to be enough to bring a full grown man to his knees.

"I'm 18, by the way."

Then theres no excuse, you should easily be able to overpower a child without resulting to phyical damage, mere restraints would do.
So... where exactly did I mess up? If you had copied my words, you wouldn't have "neutralized" spelled two different ways up there. You can't even spell "victim" right. Grammar is involved because I have a hard time telling what your sentences mean when they're a clusterfuck of words.

And I'm aware that the child isn't a threat, hence the one, underpowered backhand and not a full ass-beating. You're really not paying attention to what I say, are you? But if the child is running around kicking guys in the balls, it's clearly underdisciplined, and the smack would serve to teach it not to pick a fight it can't win.

Even parental instincts would dictate that a child who does something wrong needs to be punished. My point is not to "beat the shit out of the kid," I've said that multiple times but you don't seem to be getting it. One hit does not qualify as that. It was even another guy who said to beat the shit out of them, yet you're jumping down my throat when I even slightly disagreed with him.

As for overestimating its strength, you have any idea how little force it takes to really fuck up your eye, or at least hurt it a lot?

I make concession after concession, and you still think all I want to do is hit the kid as hard as I can just because it hit me. Please, actually read what I'm saying, don't assume I mean what I didn't say, and then reply.

You know what? There's no point arguing with you anymore. You're not paying attention anyways, so I'm done.


"Even parental instincts would dictate that a child who does something wrong needs to be punished."

I never said theres anythink wrong with disiplin, I clearly state that my neice gets a slap on the hand when she misbehaves, but a slap on the hand is alot different from a backhander across the face.

"My point is not to "beat the shit out of the kid," I've said that multiple times but you don't seem to be getting it. One hit does not qualify as that. It was even another guy who said to beat the shit out of them, yet you're jumping down my throat when I even slightly disagreed with him."

I gave up saying that you wanted to kick the shit out of the kid after you stated that it wasnt what you see it as. I gave up when you said that to beat them up you would have to backhand the child then start curb stomping it. I'm not jumping down your throat, I'm having a discussion, if you look I have taken everythink you have said seriously, Ive re read them many times before posting, were both debating on wether we think that its justified to backhand a child, you think it is and I think it isnt.

"I make concession after concession, and you still think all I want to do is hit the kid as hard as I can just because it hit me. Please, actually read what I'm saying, don't assume I mean what I didn't say, and then reply."

No I dont think you want to hit the kid as hard as you can, you clearly stated that in your last post and I didnt press the matter, I just stated your looking at the kid as if it was an adult, this is what impression you left me with the talk of adrenaline and fight or flight, I've had a child angry at me before and to come after me, there was no adrenaline in me, the child wasnt a threat, I simply grabed the hand he was trying to hit me with and grabbed his other hand and waited till he'd calmed down.

"As for overestimating its strength, you have any idea how little force it takes to really fuck up your eye, or at least hurt it a lot?"

Ive taken a good amount of damage to the eye given my hobby involves me doing alot of fighting and sparring, my eye isnt damaged, its been bruised and swollen but no permanent damage, and this is from a full grown adult, I doubt a child could do any major damage, you underestimate the human body.

"And I'm aware that the child isn't a threat, hence the one, underpowered backhand and not a full ass-beating."

If your aware the child isnt a threat then there would be no need for the backhand, not even an underpowered back hand, you would have a clear enough head to restrian the child.

"You're really not paying attention to what I say, are you? But if the child is running around kicking guys in the balls, it's clearly underdisciplined, and the smack would serve to teach it not to pick a fight it can't win."

It depends on wether the child is yours, if it isnt your child then underdisciplined or not you have no right to disciplin the child, as much as we like to we carnt, I wish I could disciplin all the kids out there in my area, smoking, drinking, potting windows, attacking other smaller kids, but I carnt. If its your child then its upto you to disciplin him.

"the smack would serve to teach it not to pick a fight it can't win."

If it is your child then I wouldnt be teaching it not to pick a fight it can't win, I'd be teaching it not to disrespect its father, but you stated that you dont fly but you fight, woundnt you want your kid following in the same idea?? Personally I would be extremely proud of my child for having the bravery to do so.

"You know what? There's no point arguing with you anymore. You're not paying attention
anyways, so I'm done."

I'm paying full attention to what your saying, maybe I'm interpriting wrong, but I'm paying attention, maybe your not paying attention to what I'm saying. Anyway if you dont what to talk or carry this on then thats your perogative and your welcome to it.
 

Rofel

New member
May 21, 2009
13
0
0
Me and a friend put a long hollow plastic rod between a friends legs and lifted him up, was fun until the rod bent and almost crushed his private parts :p
 

Sightless Wisdom

Resident Cynic
Jul 24, 2009
2,552
0
0
I havn't really injured anyone enough to call it an injury. Emotionaly...I sure like to think so :D. But not physically
 

Lordmarkus

New member
Jun 6, 2009
1,384
0
0
AH, nostalgia... Me and some kids (fourth grade) improvised a game where you should run as fast as you could and slide on the icy ground - towards each other and try to knock the other one over. It was great fun - til' my rockhard body broked another kid´s collar bone.

Good news: I hated him.
Bad news: It became a rather abrupt end on our little game.
 

OriginalError

New member
May 31, 2008
140
0
0
In my one (and only) fight during junior high... wait...

Let me start that again.

I was playing MTG with a friend in the gym during one of the shitty pep rallies in junior high. This jackass bully comes over and rips up my Mox Ruby (there is history to this, but it is irrelevant and frankly distracting to the story at hand). I picked him up by the neck in a fit of rage I've experienced maybe once since, and slammed his face into a steel girder until I was pried off of him by several people. I broke his nose and dislodged several teeth, the school district forced me to apologize.'

//J.
 

Tartarga

New member
Jun 4, 2008
3,649
0
0
stabed a guy with a pencil once broke the skin barley and it was an accident

crap now i feel pathetic for not being more violent
 

Mr Companion

New member
Jul 27, 2009
1,534
0
0
Guitarmasterx7 said:
Gooble said:
Out of pure, slightly twisted interest (the best kind of interest!) what is the best way to win a fight? Like, go crazy, measured solid attacks or a mix? Or a weapon?

And when (hopefully) should you stop attacking them?

I've never actually been in a fight, though I'm pretty sure I will be in one eventually (had several close calls), but I have no idea how well I'd do/what size of opposition I'd be able to take.
This is easy. Assuming this is life or death, if you have any sharp or heavy metal object, use it. If you don't it comes down to 2 options.
1: Tear off an ear. It takes barely any force (probably about 10-20 lbs) if you do it right (grab the top and abruptly yank down and slightly towards you.) Without an ear the person will instantly lose their balance and more than likely not be able to get up given that they are together enough to have the incentive to.
2: gouge out an eye. Gruesome, but when it comes down to it, it's very easy to do.
Well its good to see such light hearted discussion :D