lol...where to begin. I had a throw away statement, and you went agro on me and gave me a 500 word essay? Then you compare Mozart to Lady Gaga? You know that is like apple to oranges...no that is like apples to an orange smoothie. Yes they are both musicians and popular. But one is an undeniable prodigy and the other is often under estimated. And that is where I quit reading because you kind of proved my point.JacobShaftoe said:You might find it's a tad more complex than that, but if you compare the collected works of Motzart vs Lady Gaga, you can draw a very simple comparison, in that one is brilliant and not particularly popular, and the other is vacuous and incredibly popular. We can do the same comparison with gormet food vs cheetos, boutique beers vs Duff, A Zonda sportscar vs a an average SUV... Basically, what to one person seems simple and uncluttered is to another person empty of any real value.bdcjacko said:Cause people who label themselves as gamers get all snooty and think call of duty is beneath them because it is popular.
Personally, I enjoy the odd cheeseburger, but I refrain from losing my shit if someone mentions that it's empty calories and mass produced fatness fodder. I acknowledge that reality and keep chewing. If someone thinks your game is crap, it's because it probably is. Don't mistake that for meaning you are crap. Hell, there are probably loads of valid individuals who like Lady Gaga. I think she's pond scum. I think vapid skanks like here are the reason why really good musicians and artists with something other than bullshit teen angst and vacuous vague hat-tips to tolerance need to work three jobs to support their band and life, while she can do lines of supercoke of hookers nipples from now till eternity all day, every day, and that's if she stopped recording today (oh please let it be so). However, that doesn't equate (for me) to a belief that all her fans should be launched flaming from trebuchets for my personal amusement.
Your shit game may well be steering an entire industry that I and others like me that helped make commercially viable in the first place into a ditch from which I'm lucky I can find one game a year worthy of playing. So, I guess the fact that you are somehow linking your personal tastes to your self esteem and feeling hurt by the sad reality that the games you like may not be Mozart, but instead are lucky to share a stage with Lady Gaga as a fucking local support act. If you like it, you like it. My insults should have no effect on you whatsoever. A dying breed of human who values quality over mass appeal in todays corporatised world doesn't like yours and 2 billion other peoples choices. Why in the name of Lady Gaga do you give a crap?
+1 Respect.kloiberin_time said:CoD is not for me, but then again no shooters save Perfect Dark were.
uhhh... You know that when I was talking about the the person who thinks the world is full of idiots I meant it as a delusion. Also, it isn't a lonely existence. Steve jobs and Nikola Telsa both had friends. (Steve jobs made his first computer with a help of his nerd friend I believe.)JacobShaftoe said:Try being in the 1% of rational and intelligent people. It really is lonely and shit you know. If that whole attitude shits you, imagine the actual life of the person you're complaining about, including the fact that they have few if any friends, almost no social life, and have to pretend to be retarded if they want to have a conversation with a normal person without having said normal person reject or attack them for "Thinkin'yer better'n me".Littlee300 said:This and the whole "Man, 99% of the world is full of mindless idiots that I am forced to live with" mindsettriggrhappy94 said:It didn't become an insult. It just became popular.
Most gamers are nerds, there's no real two ways around that. And most nerds aren't/weren't very "popular" in high school. So, they are more prone to regect main-stream/popular things, because they represent the "popular crowd" in high school.
Also its not very complicated, the multiplayer is filled with idiots (no insult to people who play CoD), and the game skimps on the campaign.
I enjoy CoD. I play the campaign enough to get most of the achievements, and I play online long enough to max out my level (screw prestige!). Then I move on. Only to come back when playing with friends, or I want to mop up the last achievements.
Then realise that this is the saddened outcry of a person doomed to know you're incapable of comprehending, let alone agreeing with your arguement. Now, if you wish to prove this person wrong in their judgements of you, try this: Pity them and move on. Don't argue at them or judge them, just accept that theirs is a sad lonely existance, but one that has innumerable intangible knock on benefits to you, the mass consumer (ever work out who made the internet and computers, or medicine and such?). Pity them their fate, and go on to reap the benefits, but don't begrudge them the occasional existential outburst of angst and rage at a world that cannot comprehend them... If you can manage that, you prove them wrong. If you argue that your game is still cool so shut up you snooty dickbag, then you prove them right and further their isolation. Your call really...
ha ha agreed have you seen some people and why does complexity really matter anyone can play PC games it may not be simple but anyone can be good at it too see how that works lol but agreed that he is talking out of his assSmashLovesTitanQuest said:That is not true. You are talking out of your ass. Its that simple.cyrogeist said:i think it is because CoD is retardedly popular and at the same time VERY simple to play
anyone can play it
anyone can be REALLY good at it
My first sentence clarifies that I'm talking about the Multiplayer community/culture that revolves around CoD, not any specific CoD game itself. cod4 had a good campaign, as did the first two. But A)that's not what I'm talking about, and B)even if they are decent......is it worth it?Aeonknight said:What a nice ignorant statement you've got there.GrizzlerBorno said:Call of Duty (competitive multiplayer) is a Sport, pretending to be a game. Worse still, it succeeded (being the highest grossing franchise in gaming, and all). It threatens to destroy values the gaming community has held dear for decades(complexity, depth, challenge, attention to detail.etc.), and that corners us. And as the saying goes. "A Cornered Animal Is A Dangerous Animal".
The recent installments were garbage (especially black ops), but MW1 was where it all originated from. And that game was gold. It did alot of things right, that other companies (to their own discredit) have tried to recreate. MW set the bar as to what should be expected in an FPS. But that doesn't mean it's CoD's fault that other companies settle for that "bare minimum" level instead of trying to do better than MW.
that was not intended, nor does it make any real sense as a reply to your post i can understand why you would think that way if you thought it was4li3n said:Unless you have some sort of condition i'm pretty sure neither reading nor using stairs require some sort of special skills... the only other reason why you're not doing it is because you don''t want to, and i'm well within my right to look down on you when you're asking for someone else to make it so that you don't have to put in the effort at all...The Lugz said:everyone just assumes if you cant do something you're a casual bleed-over sucked in by marketing and just fling whatever half hashed insults they feel are appropriate at you and like to ignore your opinions on anything if they do not at least partially align with theirs
it's because people are %^^&*)£! and treat each-other that way in the end
Stuff being fun doesn't mean also being effortless... and you not wanting to put in the effort is not valid criticism of a work... only of it's market appeal... and that should only be interesting to the people making money off it, not the players.