Where did the Wii go wrong?

Recommended Videos

Pumpkin_Eater

New member
Mar 17, 2009
992
0
0
I read an article awhile back that said the Wii development kit wasn't very good and that 3rd party developers had a hard time getting the wiimote's functionality to pan out. Never a good sign, but the Wii's biggest problem is the ocean of shovelware that it's currently drowning in. Unfortunately that crap sells, so there's no real reason for companies other than Nintendo to invest in making high quality games.
 

TKgasmic

New member
Nov 26, 2008
94
0
0
The Wii didn't go wrong it's just that 360 and PS3 had more appealing games and people wanted that more.
 

StarStruckStrumpets

New member
Jan 17, 2009
5,491
0
0
spuddyt said:
StarStruckStrumpets said:
The Wii went wrong when the developers thought it'd be a good idea to mis-spell a child-like term for urine.
You mean pee? [absract boredom off/]
Yeah sorry about that, British parents say wee. XD

"I'm going for a wee." as an example.
 

konkwastaken

New member
Jan 16, 2009
477
0
0
Moormur said:
konkwastaken said:
twilight princess? ok it was...average but i don't think anyone who considers themselves a serious gamer would own only a Wii. Sure a lot of people buy them just for the novelty and the fact that they are a lot cheaper than the other 2 consoles but i think Nintendo is really looking at the younger casual audience than the older serious alternative.
Wow. Way to be incredibly condescending. You certainly showed me your maturity by lumping all Wii users into a single, absolute group.

I am a serious gamer. I own a Wii and a 360. To date, the only games I have purchased for my 360 are Halo 3 (of which I have only played the multiplayer), Mirror's Edge (which was incredible), Switchball from the XBLA, and Lego Indy (which came with the console). That comes to a whoping 4. On the other hand, I have purchased Super Mario Galaxy, Geometry Wars, Guiter Hero III & World Tour, Call of Duty WaW, Medal of Honor Heroes 2, Metroid Prime: Corruptions, Super Metroid (download), Boom Blox, Super Monkey Ball, Sonic and the Secret Rings, de Blob, and Tiger Woods '08 for my Wii. That's more than 4. Should I add that I play them more than my 360 games (the Wii oh so kindly lets me know how long I have played). I should add that I am well out of the 'younger, casual audience' and very serious about the games I pick to play. I look for different challanges than the "point here and click shoot" that the 360 and the PS3 offer. I also don't feel the need to stuff as much blood and gore on the screen as possible. I want a game that is fun, plain and simple. If you want to call me immature or 'preadolescent' (which is a flatout factual fallacy) go ahead.

But the Wii offers experiences that none of the other consoles of this generation do. And it's only getting better now that companies are mastering programing for the Wii's controls.
How did you get "everyone who owns a wii is an immature casual gamer" from my post, whether or not you own one doesn't change who Nintendo are targeting with it. If i were to take a survey of serious gamers the majority of them would not play a wii over a PC xbox 360 or ps3. There obviously are serious wii gamers out there like you so kindly pointed out but the fact remains, Nintendo aren't looking to sell the wii to people who meet with friends and dedicate weekends and sleepless nights to owning some noobs in online multiplayer.

How could anything be more of a point here and click to shoot than an FPS on the wii?

(don't think im a wii hater, i own a wii and actually play it too, i also own an xbox 360 and a gaming pc which i play more)
 

Woe Is You

New member
Jul 5, 2008
1,444
0
0
Mazty said:
They will tell you the same thing; the wii remotes are in no way advanced. IR is ancient and crap. The PS3 pads are more advanced and do a better job without the pathetically short range of the wii remotes.
The point of the Wii remotes isn't that they're advanced. It's that they're using tech that's old as rocks in a way that's both new and works. It's an excellent example of Gunpei Yokoi's philosophy of "Lateral Thinking of Withered Technology".

Besides, PS3 controllers don't even do the positional tracking, which the Wii controllers do and is the most important part in the whole Wii experience. Instead, the PS3 controller only detects the angle and the relative speed of itself and can thus be easily confused.

Mazty said:
The 360 may not have a successor. Look at how things are headed for it. It has to reduce costs significanlty to sell, which isn't too profitable, and all it's exclusives end up on PC, as well as XBL.
You know, Sony is in a bigger financial rut than Microsoft is currently and is doing some pretty stupid moves themselves to save money (like making sure that companies don't want to put demos on PSN), so this also could mean that we won't be seeing a PS4. But hey, the 360 really has nothing to do with this conversation and the fact that you're bringing it up in this context so you could advertise the PS3 is telling.

How much is Sony paying you, anyway?
 

Sevre

Old Hands
Apr 6, 2009
4,886
0
0
I doubt we'd see next gen consoles in the next 3 years because of Recession.
 

hannahdonno

New member
Apr 5, 2009
496
0
0
HarlyHellbender said:
hannahdonno said:
HarlyHellbender said:
Last time I heard, Nintendo was rolling in the money. If it went wrong, no one at Nintendo seems to notice.

A lot of "Hardcore" gamers just don't get it. Companies don't ALWAYS care if you like anything as an individual, especially when there are millions of others handing over their cash for what they are offering. I said it once and I'll say it again and again:

casual games = large demographic, large demographic > individuals, large demographic = $$$ that's money, honey.

As far as Nintendo is concerned, they're coming out winners.
But as far as anyone above the age of 10 is concerned, Nintendo is slowly eating away at itself.
Not EVERYONE above the age of 10 agrees with that. I know several people over the age of twenty who are also hardcore gamers and they aren't complaining. Eating away at itself? LOL And how exactly are they doing that? They're grabbing more and more customers and making tons of cash. As long as they are making money and drawing in large demographics, Nintendo is here to stay and thriving. Sure they may loose a few fans, but they are small change compared to the thousands that replace each one. Business is Business and sadly Money makes the "World go 'round" in a way. As long as they rake in the money, they don't care what a few complainers have to say. When "Hardcore" becomes a majority demographic, perhaps then they'll listen.

All in all, when Nintendo starts LOSING money, talk to me then and I might agree with you.
There is only so much longer Nintendo can get away with reusing old ideas; people are quickly becoming bored with the same old games getting released and its only a matter of time before the company implodes. Yes, they will always have a few fans tagging along, but when the day comes when they lose most of their fans, prices will have to be highered to combat the depleting sales, and there is only so much someone will pay to watch a blue hedgehog zoom around.
 

GuerrillaClock

New member
Jul 11, 2008
1,367
0
0
hannahdonno said:
There is only so much longer Nintendo can get away with reusing old ideas; people are quickly becoming bored with the same old games getting released and its only a matter of time before the company implodes. Yes, they will always have a few fans tagging along, but when the day comes when they lose most of their fans, prices will have to be highered to combat the depleting sales, and there is only so much someone will pay to watch a blue hedgehog zoom around.
Sorry, but no. As has been stated countless times before, Nintendo's franchises might use the same name on the box, but they're always different games. If you're telling me Twilight Princess was the same as Wind Waker, or that Mario Galaxy was a clone of Sunshine, I'm going to have to ask you to step outside. But, sadly for many fan-haters, when they try something new it's a "gimmick" and when they release a classic it's "flogging a dead horse".

Also, three further problems with your post:
1. The company is in no way close to implosion, because they own the handheld market even if, somehow, the Wii crashes, and have done pretty much since its' inception.
2. Sonic is SEGA. He appears on every platform now.
3. 'Highered' isn't a word.
 

Sevre

Old Hands
Apr 6, 2009
4,886
0
0
Sega has this one problem,oh yes,they haven't had a console since the Dreamcast. Nintendo has allowed Sega to publish 8 out of its 11 seventh gen games on the Wii/DS that includes Mario + Sonic 2. I think this is because Sonic sells poorly on other consoles,what about you?
 

hannahdonno

New member
Apr 5, 2009
496
0
0
GuerrillaClock said:
hannahdonno said:
There is only so much longer Nintendo can get away with reusing old ideas; people are quickly becoming bored with the same old games getting released and its only a matter of time before the company implodes. Yes, they will always have a few fans tagging along, but when the day comes when they lose most of their fans, prices will have to be highered to combat the depleting sales, and there is only so much someone will pay to watch a blue hedgehog zoom around.
Sorry, but no. As has been stated countless times before, Nintendo's franchises might use the same name on the box, but they're always different games. If you're telling me Twilight Princess was the same as Wind Waker, or that Mario Galaxy was a clone of Sunshine, I'm going to have to ask you to step outside. But, sadly for many fan-haters, when they try something new it's a "gimmick" and when they release a classic it's "flogging a dead horse".

Also, three further problems with your post:
1. The company is in no way close to implosion, because they own the handheld market even if, somehow, the Wii crashes, and have done pretty much since its' inception.
2. Sonic is SEGA. He appears on every platform now.
3. 'Highered' isn't a word.
You do have a point with the accuracy with my post, but I have had hardly any sleep, and are posting on other threads about Sega so my brauin got a bit confused. And I am ashamed with the use of the word "highered", but it seemed right at the time.

I am no fan-hater, Nintendo has had its good 'uns, but I think its past its sell by date. Simplicity can be an advantage in games, but Nintendo takes the piddle. And the games are not copys, but the similarities are so clear and the original (AT THE TIME) ideas are reused so often that yes- they are flogging a dead horse. For example, Zelda Phantom Hourglass in all is quite a good game, but while playing it, I couldn't help thinking I'd seen it all before but now everyones' heads are blown to gigantic proportions.
 

Sevre

Old Hands
Apr 6, 2009
4,886
0
0
Like I mentioned earlier,the Mario Party series has been reissued to death. 8 games?!8! That is a joke. If you invite friends around to your house for a night of gaming and ask " What Mario party would you like to play?" you deserve to be Falcon punched.
 

Moormur

New member
Mar 24, 2009
168
0
0
konkwastaken said:
Moormur said:
konkwastaken said:
twilight princess? ok it was...average but i don't think anyone who considers themselves a serious gamer would own only a Wii. Sure a lot of people buy them just for the novelty and the fact that they are a lot cheaper than the other 2 consoles but i think Nintendo is really looking at the younger casual audience than the older serious alternative.


(don't think im a wii hater, i own a wii and actually play it too, i also own an xbox 360 and a gaming pc which i play more)
Well hold on...if we throw PCs into the equation, then PC gaming ftw ;)
 

spuddyt

New member
Nov 22, 2008
1,006
0
0
StarStruckStrumpets said:
spuddyt said:
StarStruckStrumpets said:
The Wii went wrong when the developers thought it'd be a good idea to mis-spell a child-like term for urine.
You mean pee? [absract boredom off/]
Yeah sorry about that, British parents say wee. XD

"I'm going for a wee." as an example.
no no, i understood that, I was simply being weird and choosing to interpret the word that means the same but isn't actually the one that springs immediately to one's mind
 

Symp4thy

New member
Jan 7, 2009
660
0
0
The Wii shipped 46.08 M units so far worldwide. The 360 and PS3 shipped 29.76 M and 21.55 M respectively. Yeah, the Wii went so wrong.

Edit
 

ChromeAlchemist

New member
Aug 21, 2008
5,865
0
0
Mazty said:
ChromeAlchemist said:
Calling the Wii a gimmick is not a fact, it is an opinion, just like much of what you have said is opinion, not fact.

You say that dual layer DVDs are too small for games at the moment, but Rage is one of few games that would be too costly to put onto multiple dual layer DVDs.

The majority of the 360 games that are on dual layer DVDs are on a single Dual layer DVD, so what stops the Wii's successor from having the processing power of the 360? Would the games that are being developed for it not have enough space on a disc? I think the majority of them would. Very few things could stop them from using dual layered DVD format.

Also couple the motion sensing technology within the remote with the motion plus peripheral and the tech is advanced further. Granted I am not saying that it is years ahead of anything else, but it is still advanced.

As for the children, I believe as they own the console, they will grow into the first party efforts, and the better quality titles of the Wii. Then out of brand loyalty, they would be more likely to buy the Wii's successor. After all, that is how people behaved with the NES,SNES, N64, and so on. Also I am talking about those children growing up. Granted the PS3 may still be around, but the 360 and Wii will have a successor.
The wii already uses it's own version of DVDs, so you're saying that next generation it will use the exact same size. Unless they implement installations and clever compression techniques, they will still run into size problems. The 360 has compression techniques and still is having problems with size.
Ask anyone who knows something about electronics. They will tell you the same thing; the wii remotes are in no way advanced. IR is ancient and crap. The PS3 pads are more advanced and do a better job without the pathetically short range of the wii remotes.
The NES, SNES and N64 provided quality games. Games, not party games. You didn't mention how those people then didn't buy the GC. Why was that? The gamecube was aimed at little kids and that utterly failed. The Wii has the advantage of being the must buy item for bored housewives and familys. Again, neither of those parties care about graphics or gameplay so will not be bothered to get the next console. Then it is down to the kid, who will no doubt be looking for better games, so will turn to the actual game consoles.
The 360 may not have a successor. Look at how things are headed for it. It has to reduce costs significanlty to sell, which isn't too profitable, and all it's exclusives end up on PC, as well as XBL. Microsoft are clearly focusing more on the PC then on the 360. Plus having to make a new format for a console seems far to expensive an investment just for a console. Sony had the advantage that bluray is now the HD format. Anything MS come up with will just be a game console format. Same with the wii. Both are using DVD tech at the moment, and the 360 is struggling with it. In a year there will be more issues, let alone in 3.
The Gamecube was not aimed at children, it was aimed at the core (or hardcore, if you must) and Nintendo used to be fucking piss poor at advertising, and couple that with some other factors, like the gamecube's low storage medium, and that's why it didn't do as well as it should have.

I will stop fighting that the Wii remote's technology is advanced, however I will ask how the PS3's controller is more advanced than a wii remote coupled with motion plus. And the Wii Remote's range is 10 metres. Now I have no clue how big your room is, or how much range the PS3 controller has, but 10 metres should be ample range for the majority of the people that use it.

The proprietary disc format that Nintendo had created was to avoid the licensing fees from the DVD forum. What stops them from creating another disc format with Panasonic, like they have for the last two generations? They have many years to work around the problems that the 360 is having with their format, and if they do come up with something then they could use a similar disc format. Remember that DVDs still take up 87% of video sales, so there is no immediate reason to jump ship at all, and if Nintendo won't pay the licensing fees of the DVD forum, there is no way in hell they would adopt the Blu-Ray format, over creating their own with Panasonic.

As it stands, Sony is much further into the red than Microsoft is. Now I know you are going to tell me that in the long run that Sony will turn over a huge profit when the components in the PS3 become cheaper and they have a larger install base, that is as obvious as Nintendo's blue ocean strategy. But if that's the case then why haven't they dropped the price yet? We know they stand to lose more money but do they not stand to gain more in the long run? And why are they resorting to certain measures to save money, like their charges on PSN which is causing companies to turn to Microsoft's XBL? If Blu-Ray only has a life expectancy of five years, that could have a negative effect on the 10 year plan of Sony.

Not only is the Wii an actual console with actual games, but when the franchises continue along with new IP on the Wii's successor, the children may well buy the next console based on the joy he/she has had from this console. And before they do that, as they grow, they will thrive on high quality titles, something that the Wii's library has and can provide, and they are more likely to buy the games on the console they own, than go out and buy another.

And take into account what you are saying, casual gamers who play the Wii don't care about anything other than the basic components and party games that are on the console, so why would they buy the Wii's successor? Nintendo surely know this, and chances are the Wii's successor will not be aimed at 'everyone' like this one has, but more at the core audience (with consideration to the non core), which the children (you know, the driving force behind all families) from the last generation will grow into. Then this console will become more and more like the PS2 as time passes.

P.S. That link a few posts back was wrong. This is the correct one http://gameoverthinker.blogspot.com/2008/08/episode-eleven-can-it-happen-to-us.html

EDIT: Also show me proof that Microsoft is paying more attention to the PC market please.