Where is Half Life 2 Episode 3!?

Recommended Videos

HunterG24

New member
Oct 9, 2008
5
0
0
Episode 3 is in hell. Valve hasn't sacrificed enough souls to the Devil, thus he won't release it. If anyone would like to speed things up a bit, please send your soul to Valve. Don't expect a refund.
 

SquirrelPants

New member
Dec 22, 2008
1,729
0
0
IanBrazen said:
Souplex said:
What are your thoughts?
Ive just given up all hope of ever seeing the damn thing.
They had a good idea with episodic gaming: shorter games, for cheaper price, released more frequently.
Instead I get Big bundles of small games at full price while I still own 2 of those 5 in the bundle, released whenever they feel like it.
Valve is so kind and yet so cruel to their fans at the same time.
Hey valve maybe now that you have alienated your Half-life fans you can re skin L4D again, add a flamethrower and make LFD3.
"Cha-Ching"
...What the fuck are you talking about? Making a different game instead of making Episode 3 isn't a big deal. That's not alienating fans, they're just making different stuff, and putting more resources into making different stuff.

And the L4D3 comment wasn't clever in any way, it seems as if that's how you intended it. L4D2 was a completely different game from the first, set in the same basic universe and with the same basic premise. But the characters, maps, weapons, and the zombies themselves are much different from those in the first, and while the games have the same concept and name, they are totally different.
 

Wicky_42

New member
Sep 15, 2008
2,468
0
0
Souplex said:
...As for the Gravity gun, objects are either useless, or obscure your view. (The exceptions being the saw disc, the oxygen tank and the exploding barrel (Although using that will probably result in it taking a buillet and blowing up in your face) Travelling indoors is impossible with an object, you can't sprint while gravitizing something, and if you don't enter a battle with an object, it is easier to just shoot the guy with your shotgun.
You, sir, have no idea how to use the gravity gun, or are distinctly lacking in imagination. 'objects obscure your view' so what? You don't need to be able to see much to crush them with a radiator or a barrel, and if you can't see them chances are they can't shoot you. Yes, you can use objects as shields! Have you never reflexively flung a burning barrel into a group of combine in the heat of battle ("and if you don't enter a battle with an object, it is easier to just shoot the guy with your shotgun" - lol, fail)? Caught an incoming energy orb and sent it back from whence it came? Charged down a corridor wilding a radiator ("Travelling indoors is impossible" my ass)?

Nope, you're wrong on those counts, plain and simple.
 

tmujir955

New member
Oct 12, 2009
761
0
0
Souplex said:
Pyode said:
Souplex said:
And I disapprove of that to a lesser extent for steering Co-Op gaming in a bad direction. Co-Op does not mean gimping everyone so they are useless on their own.
You mean forcing them to work co-operatively?
Yes, but there are better (Not sucky) ways to go aboot it. http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/9.138120#3105271
Um.. you know it's spelled "about", right?
 

L3m0n_L1m3

New member
Jul 27, 2009
3,049
0
0
Filler? You meant substance? You know, that thing used to make good games?

Honestly, if everything went according to plan, there wouldn't even BE combine. The war would end with humans winning and you would just wander around with absolutely nothing to do.
 

archvile93

New member
Sep 2, 2009
2,564
0
0
SikOseph said:
Souplex said:
Let me paraphrase the original post with a TL;DR version:

'Waaaa I want attention! I will not like hl2 without really playing it! Damn, people who justify their opinions challenged me to do the same! I know, I'll play through it to purposely dislike it, and thus prove my point!'

AverageJoe said:
Congratulations, you have an opinion that differs from the majority. Nobody cares.

If you want to write a review, then do one with valid factual points that are interesting to read. But you didn't want to review the game, you wanted to do a subtle rant on a forum where you know a lot of people love Half-Life games, in an attempt to get a reaction because it makes you feel somewhat superior to rile people up and because you think your opinion is better than others.

Get over yourself, please.
This very accurately sums up my feelings.

Get over yourself, please.
In particular - this could be applied to almost every post of yours I've read.
Gotta agree with this. While I don't know why some people see the game as revolutionary or the second coming of christ, It was a solid, well put together game. You shoot stuff, it falls down, and the plot didn't make me throw up. Granted, I wish the game had just one mid range weapon (what kind of future doesn't have assault rifles), and yes, the gravity gun is pretty pointless for everything but puzzle solving (except at the end), but that doesn't make the game bad. I don't think it was phenomial, but it was above average at worst.
 

Fuhjem

New member
Jan 17, 2009
267
0
0
How is any of that "Filler"? If everything went perfectly, there would be no conflict or reason to move on. The story would be flat and unlayered and uninteresting.
 

JWAN

New member
Dec 27, 2008
2,725
0
0
how long did it take them to get from HL to HL2?

stop bitching
 

Souplex

Souplex Killsplosion Awesomegasm
Jul 29, 2008
10,312
0
0
tmujir955 said:
Souplex said:
Pyode said:
Souplex said:
And I disapprove of that to a lesser extent for steering Co-Op gaming in a bad direction. Co-Op does not mean gimping everyone so they are useless on their own.
You mean forcing them to work co-operatively?
Yes, but there are better (Not sucky) ways to go aboot it. http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/9.138120#3105271
Um.. you know it's spelled "about", right?
It is a fake Canadian accent.
 

tmujir955

New member
Oct 12, 2009
761
0
0
Souplex said:
tmujir955 said:
Souplex said:
Pyode said:
Souplex said:
And I disapprove of that to a lesser extent for steering Co-Op gaming in a bad direction. Co-Op does not mean gimping everyone so they are useless on their own.
You mean forcing them to work co-operatively?
Yes, but there are better (Not sucky) ways to go aboot it. http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/9.138120#3105271
Um.. you know it's spelled "about", right?
It is a fake Canadian accent.
Oh... mkay.

*continues with regular life*
 

Ranthus

New member
Mar 7, 2009
129
0
0
Souplex said:
Every week some obnoxious Valve fanboy makes that thread convinced it will make Valve release it tomorrow or something. I however have figured out what is taking them so long, hopefully this will put an end to that thread topic.
I have the answer already. It's TF2 updates.
I recently played through the entirety of Half Life 2 and it's episodes in the interest of backing up my opinions because one my friends insisted that 2 hours of gameplay was not enough to label the entire game as "Meh" (Turns out he was wrong.)
He was wrong, although not as in I completely agree with you. I thought it was better, but what I meant is that you can judge a game in 2 hours.
Those of you who want episode 3: They would be done with the series if 90% of Half Life 2 weren't padding.
Disagreements here
Think aboot it: You are aboot to teleport to the next part of the story? Nope, headcrab screws it up and you need to go through that annoying hovercarft part.
That wasn't so annoying to me. Besides, it wasn't really like they just stuck that in there, it moved the plot forward. Combine were closer to finding Kleiner because of that.
You are aboot to kick some Combine ass with the Shoehorned in physics gun? ("We made a physics engine, and we are going to make you care!") Rubble blocks your way and you need to run through Ravenholm.
Agree.
I forget the reason you needed to use that dune buggy that steered like gremlins were wrestling over the wheel but I am fairly certain that was filler as well.
How else were you supposed to get to Nova Prospekt?
Those are the most noticeable instances in the first part.

Episode one has the least filler with the only part that distinctly stood out as filler being the underground zombie part.
Episode 2 is basically filler until you get to that obnoxious sticky bomb part. *Train gets de-railed* Looks like you have to walk. Alyx is mauled and now you need to save her for some reason despite the much more likeable generic soldiers (Because they don't make stupid puns like "Zombines", and don't get in your way on narrow pathways as much.) being killed off left and right, so you have to go to this base located in the middle of an antlion nest(What idiot thought that would be a good spot for a base?). Whats that? You need to journey to the heart of an antlion nest to find a macguffin needed to save that unlikeable sidekick. Now you need to find a car. (This is the least noticeable instance of filler, because if not for that train wreck at the beginning you wouldn't need the car in the first place) Then you actually start advancing the plot again.

If Valve weren't so dedicated to their filler, they could have finished the Half Life series, noticed that the only thing they excel at is puzzles, and turned their focus to puzzle games.

What are your thoughts?

Edit: Also, it has only been 2 years since episode 2. There is a longer wait for Mario games.
Last bit I don't remember enough.
 

JPRanger

New member
Dec 30, 2009
44
0
0
I dont understand how theres even an arguement here, the Half:Life franchise has been one of the greatest successes in the gaming industry..ever..and nothing anyone could ***** about is going to change that, or change valve's proven formula for there game...it makes money ..the masses like it..so its not gonna change over one person whining about "filler"..whose definition of "filler" is clearly mistaken. I would continue but everything else I would say about story has been covered by several other people who feel the same...so w.e..its clear this guys outnumbered.
 

ChipSandwich

New member
Jan 3, 2010
182
0
0
In my opinion, the only things in Half Life 2 that could be considered filler are any puzzles to do with box stacking and the painfully repetitive second last level (gameplay wise, not story wise).
Everything else seems to have a purpose for gameplay or story:
-The headcrab stuff led to Dr Breen being alerted to Gordon Freeman's presence, and thus lots of guns and shooting
-Ravenholm zombie town allowed you to test the Gravity Gun on opponents who don't shoot back
-The dune buggy was there because that was pretty much the quickest way to get to Nova Prospekt from Black Mesa East, or the area thereabouts.
 

bartholen_v1legacy

A dyslexic man walks into a bra.
Jan 24, 2009
3,056
0
0
ChipSandwich said:
In my opinion, the only things in Half Life 2 that could be considered filler are any puzzles to do with box stacking and the painfully repetitive second last level (gameplay wise, not story wise).
Everything else seems to have a purpose for gameplay or story:
-The headcrab stuff led to Dr Breen being alerted to Gordon Freeman's presence, and thus lots of guns and shooting
-Ravenholm zombie town allowed you to test the Gravity Gun on opponents who don't shoot back
-The dune buggy was there because that was pretty much the quickest way to get to Nova Prospekt from Black Mesa East, or the area thereabouts.
The dune buggy was the only way to get to Nova Prospekt, but the driving section was soooooo overly long that I forgot where I was actually going and why on my first playthrough. I was like "Hey, Alyx, what the F is she doing here?" when you catch a glimpse of her and the train in the chapter "Entanglement". And it was actually quite obnoxious when I realised there are three entire chapters in the game in a row without any plot advancement: Highway 17, Sandtraps and Nova Prospekt.
 

Xanadu84

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,946
0
0
Guess what, they didn't even have to make Modern Warfare 2! Just shoot Shepard right before the first obstacle course, and BAM! Storyline over.

Or even more, don't play most of the Prince of Persia games, particularly the new one. The storyline just resets anyways.

The point is that the quickest way to get through the plot is not always the best story. Often times in story's, things happen which make the characters ultimate success more difficult. And they have to do things to overcome that inconvenient obstacle. That's kind of what makes it a...you know...story. I'm curious what storyline doesn't do what your accusing HL2 of doing.

Also, the point of the Zombine thing was that it was MEANT to be cheesy.

Sounds to me like you just don't like Half Life 2. Which is fine. Your opinion. But it seems like your really grasping at straws for an argument as to why you dislike it. I think you should stop trying so hard. Half Life 2 is a shooter. There is a story most assuredly, but it is still a story meant to hold together a series of gunfights. That's just the nature of the beast. Maybe you just don't like that.
 

AlphaOmega

New member
Oct 10, 2008
1,732
0
0
Valve has so much of the Digital Distribution market at the moment it is pretty much an oligopoly with them in charge; they have tons of cash and they seem to take their merry time to perfect games.

Look at TF2, no way they make money on that game with all the updates, but it draws people in to steam...

I agree it is taking too long though, and it might just be half life 3...