There's criticism and there's calling the art "Designed by a 14 year old." One is what i would hope a well researched discussion about whatever has them upset and the other is a childish attack that shouldn't be coming from someone who calls themselves a "journalist."Fappy said:Some of the things said about Dragon's Crown were unfair to be sure, but that doesn't mean people shouldn't be allowed to criticize it. Personally, I have no problem with the art in the game as I know its roots (Frank Frazetta + anime right?) and there's nothing inherently malicious about having a sorceress with giant, floppy bewbs.Thorn14 said:I prefer the term "Gamer" thank you. I know, we're dead and all but I'll just be a vampire I guess.Fappy said:It all comes down to self-validation, imo. People tend to associate criticisms of things they enjoy/agree with as direct attacks. When gamers see their favorite game under fire, many of them feel a need to defend against the criticism lest they feel lessened as an individual.Impulse725 said:I see people complaining that someone's coming for their games significantly more than anyone saying "this game shouldn't exist". I guess everyone slept through English class. Academic criticism is not a prelude to banning all FPSs, some people just like dissecting stuff.Fappy said:I don't see anyone saying that, especially around here. Even "she who will not be named" (Anita) says in her videos that it's okay to appreciate and enjoy something while simultaneously pointing out and identifying its flaws.
If everything needs a label, how about this one: HVWs (Hobby Validation Warriors).
I know it is silly to take it as an attack on yourself but its a human response I think when you deeply care about something. I know I've heard people who disagree with Anita have called it attacks on Feminism before, so its not a gamer exclusive thing.
I just don't like the idea of shaming a game because of an artistic vision. Dragon's Crown is one of the most beautiful games in gaming, we can name the type of games with that kind of artstyle on one hand, and it could have seriously been hurt because of the crusade against it by one prominent website, simply because it DARED to have shapely women (and impossibly buff ass men, but we ignore that because thats just a power fantasy.)
Whoops. Meant designed. Not Written. Made a mistake there.Zachary Amaranth said:You said "written." He was talking character design.Thorn14 said:He outright says its designed by a teenage boy!
Your exact strawman."I don't like Dragon's Crown art and shittalk it, its written by a 14 year old because it has shapely women!"
If you think that calling you on this sort of thing is an attack, report me. It's not, though. It's calling you when you misattribute and distort things because, ironically, a writer hurt your feelings over a piece of artwork.