I haven't seen or read Twilight, so this post is directed entirely at Eragon.
I don't think Hollywood ruined anything. I think the awfulness of the film was a good reflection of the quality of the source material. The Eragon books sucked, quite frankly. It's Star Wars' story copy-pasted into Middle-earth. The story is unoriginal, the characters are boring, and the quality of the writing is quite terrible. The film was much like the book, except that it somehow managed to actually be worse. The total creative bankruptcy was compounded by bad acting and a script worse than the prose of the novels. On top of that, the film was so rushed and badly edited that there was no time for any character development whatsoever. It was horrible.
darthzew said:
But it's like Hollywood trashed a holy temple when they made Eragon.
Surely Star Wars is the holy temple to which you are referring, and Christopher Paolini is the one who trashed it? Paolini looted and plundered everything of value from this particular temple, took a few minutes to damage some of the artefacts, and put them on display in his own, hastily constructed temple, claiming that they were his own.
I'm relatively certain that the last book in the series will end with a huge battle outside Uru'Baen, while Eragon sneaks into the city to kill Galbatorix. He and Murtagh will fight, and Murtagh will be defeated. Galbatorix will then proceed to kill Eragon with
force lightning magic, but Murtagh, seeing his brother dying, will intervene and kill Galbatorix. Because he swore to serve him, however, Murtagh will die.
Sound familiar?