who is the second most evil person in history to you?

Recommended Videos

Kathinka

New member
Jan 17, 2010
1,141
0
0
omega 616 said:
Kathinka said:
i find it rather fascinating / disturbing how many people trivialize the crimes of hitler by placing him so low on the evil-scale :D
Compared to pol pot he didn't kill that many, if I remember correctly.
depends on how you count really. you could blame hitler for every dead in the second world war. but what makes his evil unique is the intent and the efforts to whipe out an entire people, down to the last individual, and not just some elaborate scheme, they really tried and gave their best to make it happen. that is something no other man, no matter how evil, did. that's why i consider stalin not nice, but better then hitler. he might have done extremely cruel and unjust things, but he is also responsible for stopping the undoubtably most vicious individual in human history.
 

jthm

New member
Jun 28, 2008
825
0
0
PhunkyPhazon said:
Fred Phelps, no contest. If it weren't the fact that everyone already recognizes him for being bat-shit insane, he probably WOULD turn into a modern day Hitler.
Credit where it's due though, Phelps actually did some positive work for civil rights in his youth. Still a scumbag, but not on the same level as Hitler.

I'd have to go with Stalin myself. Higher body count than Hitler and got away with it too.
 

omega 616

Elite Member
May 1, 2009
5,883
1
43
Kathinka said:
omega 616 said:
Kathinka said:
i find it rather fascinating / disturbing how many people trivialize the crimes of hitler by placing him so low on the evil-scale :D
Compared to pol pot he didn't kill that many, if I remember correctly.
depends on how you count really. you could blame hitler for every dead in the second world war. but what makes his evil unique is the intent and the efforts to whipe out an entire people, down to the last individual, and not just some elaborate scheme, they really tried and gave their best to make it happen. that is something no other man, no matter how evil, did. that's why i consider stalin not nice, but better then hitler. he might have done extremely cruel and unjust things, but he is also responsible for stopping the undoubtably most vicious individual in human history.
If were counting it on intentions then I would be way up there aswell, while I have not killed any body and have no intention of doing so. I think we are a cancer on this planet, everything else lives in a balance, humans dominate and control everything, we take without giving back.
 

Kathinka

New member
Jan 17, 2010
1,141
0
0
omega 616 said:
Kathinka said:
omega 616 said:
Kathinka said:
i find it rather fascinating / disturbing how many people trivialize the crimes of hitler by placing him so low on the evil-scale :D
Compared to pol pot he didn't kill that many, if I remember correctly.
depends on how you count really. you could blame hitler for every dead in the second world war. but what makes his evil unique is the intent and the efforts to whipe out an entire people, down to the last individual, and not just some elaborate scheme, they really tried and gave their best to make it happen. that is something no other man, no matter how evil, did. that's why i consider stalin not nice, but better then hitler. he might have done extremely cruel and unjust things, but he is also responsible for stopping the undoubtably most vicious individual in human history.
If were counting it on intentions then I would be way up there aswell, while I have not killed any body and have no intention of doing so. I think we are a cancer on this planet, everything else lives in a balance, humans dominate and control everything, we take without giving back.
then maybe we can squeeze you in somewhere between the two george bushes and pol pot. just kidding :D

though you might be right with your statement, personally i intent on enjoying my parasite existence on this planet for as long as i can^^
 

omega 616

Elite Member
May 1, 2009
5,883
1
43
Kathinka said:
then maybe we can squeeze you in somewhere between the two george bushes and pol pot. just kidding :D

though you might be right with your statement, personally i intent on enjoying my parasite existence on this planet for as long as i can^^
Just the bottom 5% contributing to the country every 30 years, we control the population of other animals, were animals just a different kind of animal, yet there is over 6.8 billion of us!

If there was 6.8 billion elephants we would kill all but about a billion of them, if there was 6.8 billion ducks we would wipe them out, same with dogs, cats and just about everything except insects.

Nothing causes as much destruction as humans do, building massive cities, flooding massive sections of land by building damns, cutting down masses of forests and poaching.
 

CloggedDonkey

New member
Nov 4, 2009
4,055
0
0
cl20 said:
CloggedDonkey said:
I chose second because I'm pretty damn sure killing 12 million people because "they are not like me" is pretty much as evil as you can get, and I don't want everyone putting down Hitler. anyway, for me it was Dr. Antonio Moniz, who invented the lobotomies. his practice was wide spread(used by parents to make an unruly child more.. um, ruly and husbands on wives who had a brain and a heart) until it was outlawed by the soviet union in the 50's. that's the equivalent Hitler and Satan agreeing firmly that you're an ass and giving you a firm kick in the nads. he was killed by one of his own patience, who was probably seeking revenge for having a piece of his brain removed. he got a noble peace prize for it to, proving that all you have to do to get one is to turn people into zombies(basically what a lobotomy did).

I got most of the details from here: [link]http://www.cracked.com/article_18382_the-6-most-baffling-nobel-prizes-ever-awarded.html[/link]
Im sorry but the genecide was set to be 6,000,000 the rest was war and all sides had part in that. Stalin on the other side killed aprox. 20,000,000 people just becouse he didnt like them throughout his reign of terror, sadly he had no such great thing as racism to hang over his slaughter or didnt kill a prominent enough ethic group, but instead he just picked of slavs. So personaly i think stalin should be place 1. As number 2 i would almost say julius ceasar and his empire (romans where the first fashists and were down with genocides + enslavery etc)
well, Hitler killed 6 million Jews, the rest where gypsies, gays, and anyone else he didn't like, but mostly because he thought they picked the wrong answer to the religion question.
 

Lord Beautiful

New member
Aug 13, 2008
5,940
0
0
GreyWolf257 said:
Hitler. Mao Zedong is number one. Don't believe me? Check out the death tolls on this page: http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat1.htm

Mao: 44.5-70 Million killed murdered or deaths attributed to him.

Hitler: Upwards of 42 Million murdered or deaths that can be attributed to him.
Pretty much this. In addition to the death tolls, at least Hitler was eventually snuffed out. Mao gets to die of old age, most likely.
 

ChromeAlchemist

New member
Aug 21, 2008
5,865
0
0
Hitler. See what I did there? Pretty original amirite?

But in all honesty, yes Hitler. Or hell he might even be third, Stalin is second and Mao is first.
 

Trotgar

New member
Sep 13, 2009
504
0
0
Hitler, after me.

[sub][sub][sub][sub][sub]not really[/sub][/sub][/sub] [/sub][/sub]
 

k-ossuburb

New member
Jul 31, 2009
1,312
0
0
Shawn "VenomFangX" from Youtube deserves a mention; he's more stupid than evil, but he took donations to help kids dying in a hospital ward gain a little hope and then spent every penny on himself. Other than that, I'd have to say the 2nd most evil person ever would have to be the guy who decided that all hotdog buns should come in packs of 6, but all hotdogs come in packs of 8, CURSE YOU!

On a side note, check out Dr. Kellogg, of the Corn Flakes fame, he did some pretty horrible things.
 

TankCopter

New member
Jul 8, 2009
425
0
0
1. Pol Pot. Fucker was insane, and cruel as hell.
2. Chairman Mao Zedong\Tse-Tsung. Starved his country half to death in an attempt to force an industrial revolution. AFTER incurring a nasty revolution which turned China to Communism.
3. Stalin. As a moustachioed murderer, he tops Hitler any day.
4. Heinrich Himmler. The dude at the head of the Schutzstaffel. Tied with Mengele, because shit, some of the stuff he got up to...

Hitler WAS a meanie face, but he had other people doing his evil dirty work for him. His moustache sucked, too.